Skip to comments.
Drug Czar: Tide Turning in Drug War
Fox News ^
| Wednesday, February 18, 2004
| By Peter Brownfeld
Posted on 02/18/2004 6:27:08 PM PST by TKDietz
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:39:02 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
WASHINGTON — America is achieving historic successes in the war on drugs, and some high-tech gadgets may be helping to turn the tide, John P. Walters (search), the nation's drug czar, said on Wednesday.
"We've had use go down by 11 percent by teenagers over the last two years. We haven't seen that happen in 10 years — 400,000 less kids are using drugs in 2003 than in 2001," Walters told an audience attending a counter-drug technology exhibit in Washington, D.C.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: drugczar; drugtrafficking; johnwalters; prohibition; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-97 next last
1
posted on
02/18/2004 6:27:08 PM PST
by
TKDietz
To: TKDietz
Let's assume for a minute that they "win" the WOD. What will be the next massive Governmental money grab from the citizens?
2
posted on
02/18/2004 6:29:09 PM PST
by
Enterprise
("Do you know who I am?")
To: TKDietz
Walters, whose official title is director of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy (search), demonstrated some of the technology contributing to this success. Mini-buster contraband detectors, night vision kits and wiretap systems were among several items on display at the exhibit. Your police state at work. They get better at it every year.
To: Enterprise
Dunno...war on eating? War on sex?
To: Enterprise
What will be the next massive Governmental money grab from the citizens?The War On Global WarmingObseityTrans FatsArsenic in the WaterSUVsSuburban SprawlHuntersSmokersDrinkersMeat EatersFishermenGolfersDead White GuysLive White GuysConservatives as PsychosGun OwnersSpecial InterestsRepublicans [insert something liberals hate here]
5
posted on
02/18/2004 6:33:10 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(John Kerry - talking out both ends of the horse since 1970...)
To: proxy_user
The "addiction" by the Government to taxpayer dollars for massive jobs and perks won't end with the WOD. I was just curious what's next.
6
posted on
02/18/2004 6:33:30 PM PST
by
Enterprise
("Do you know who I am?")
To: dirtboy
Well, if the RATS get their power back, your guess is as good as anyone else's!
7
posted on
02/18/2004 6:34:14 PM PST
by
Enterprise
("Do you know who I am?")
To: Enterprise
If the war on drugs was something they could win, they'd have done it by now. But don't worry, they don't need to win the war on drugs before they go after the next big money/power grab.
8
posted on
02/18/2004 6:37:40 PM PST
by
TKDietz
To: Enterprise
Oh pooh, like they want to kill the cash cow? No way!
Let's see, 400,000 (where did they come up with that number, for crying out loud?) less kids using pot, divide that by the cost of the drug war, about 14 kazillion dollars and it works out to roughly just over 3 gabillion dollars per person not using drugs anymore.
Yup. Winning war. Therapy too expensive.
9
posted on
02/18/2004 6:39:14 PM PST
by
LaraCroft
(If the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, do the stupid get stupider?)
To: TKDietz
Another tool is a drugwipe, which a police officer uses to wipe a surface to detect traces of marijuana, cocaine, opiates or amphetamines. If the drugs are present, the swab changes color. One would think that were drugs actually present, no "drugwipe" would be needed to detect them. But it's a brave new world, and there are many things I don't understand.
To: TKDietz
We've been winning the WOD for almost a century now.
11
posted on
02/18/2004 6:43:50 PM PST
by
Lexington Green
(... and a cavity search for every schoolchild.)
To: LaraCroft
I also wonder where the number come from . And after whatching c-span hearing on the drug trade in afganastan the numbers are about to change and not for the good .
12
posted on
02/18/2004 6:45:49 PM PST
by
Boner1
(Its Time to change are drug laws for some have gone on to be POTUS while other's have been inprison)
To: proxy_user
War on Food;
Tax on Sex ( Viagra Viagra ) - Would Narcissists demand Onanism be taxed or untaxed?
War on Obesity, first.
To: Lexington Green
Wow, some like minded FReepers. How refreshing.
14
posted on
02/18/2004 6:55:25 PM PST
by
ItisaReligionofPeace
(I'm from the government and I'm here to help.)
To: TKDietz
"We've had use go down by 11 percent by teenagers over the last two years. We haven't seen that happen in 10 years 400,000 less kids are using drugs in 2003 than in 2001," Walters told an audience attending a counter-drug technology exhibit in Washington, D.C.Just like a bureaucrat to take credit for a cultural trend with no data to support any nexus between the two. Which reminds me; I parked my truck for the winter and look how cold it's been, I think I reversed Global Warming!
15
posted on
02/18/2004 7:00:01 PM PST
by
TigersEye
(Carrying a gun is a social obligation.)
To: TKDietz
Well, I'm certainly glad we are winning the War On Drugs! Let's lock up all them hippie freako potheads and speed freaks! We need to protect our precious middle class America!
Now excuse me, but I've got to wash down my Paxil with my nightly martini. Then I've got to get the Ritalin for my 7 year old ready for his DrugFreeSchool tomorrow... and the dose of pink bubblegum flavored liquid Prozac for my 4 month old baby girl.... my wife needs her dose of prescription diet pills... and of course grandpa needs his lithium because without it he complains too much about being stuck in a wheelchair...... and.......
16
posted on
02/18/2004 7:19:08 PM PST
by
Seruzawa
(A Dr. may give you anti-depressants... you're still a junkie like a smackhead.)
To: TKDietz
Rush going to Rehab singlehandedly turned the stats around?
To: LaraCroft
Yup. Winning war. Therapy too expensive.No one was quoted in the article as saying we are winning the war. They are simply talking about one statistic in a battle. So, what's your point?
18
posted on
02/18/2004 7:34:22 PM PST
by
1L
To: TKDietz
YAY! WAR ON DRUGS!
WHAT A F****N SUCCESS!
YAY GOVMINT!
19
posted on
02/18/2004 7:36:04 PM PST
by
H2dude
To: TKDietz
Drug Czar: Tide Turning in Drug War......
Yeah, sure. Maybe if you say it enough somebody will start to believe it.
20
posted on
02/18/2004 7:39:28 PM PST
by
wireman
To: Everybody
"The federal government is encouraging the militarization of local police forces by giving away weaponry and providing advisers," Barr said, commenting on general trends in policing, not only on anti-drug policies."
______________________________________
It's incredible that these Fed fools don't realize what a dangerous game they are playing..
Do they really believe that the American people will just sit back and accept a police state based on perpetual 'wars'?
21
posted on
02/18/2004 7:52:51 PM PST
by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines conservatism; - not the GOP. .)
To: wireman
I don't believe it myself. I just thought the article might spark some interesting discussion. I suspect the numbers Walters is citing are bogus as well. We'll see though I suppose.
22
posted on
02/18/2004 8:12:26 PM PST
by
TKDietz
To: TKDietz
We have two examples of our gov't's equal application of our publicly-espoused moral and societal standards to every country:
1. The massive increase in opium acreage now that the Taliban are out of power. After all, the CIA is friendly fwith those war-lords.
2. Pakistan's sale of nuclear technology and materials.
I wonder why all those people don't believe "our" gov't?
23
posted on
02/18/2004 9:14:33 PM PST
by
jedi
(Pre-digested opinions are so much simpler to assimilate)
To: swarthyguy
To: Enterprise
You're a starship?
And no it wont' end. Still, I wonder why local police departments need M-16s? To use against the town's people?
This is getting scary. What sort of war are they preparing for anyway? A war against the town's people?
There must be something big planned down the pipeline for this sort of preparation.
25
posted on
02/18/2004 10:25:36 PM PST
by
takenoprisoner
(illegally posting on an expired tag)
To: TKDietz
I'd be real curious how he thinks he is getting anywhere close to an accurate audit (to a smaller degree of error than the 10% or so he's claiming) of teen marijuana usage. It's mostly clandestine so it's hard to measure.
To: 1L
I assumed my point is obvious. Aside from the infringement of my constitutional rights and having to live in a police state, they pour billions of dollars a year into the 'drug war', and they are, for the first time in decades, trumpeting a small decrease in the amount of crime.
It's like this, you see. It doesn't really matter WHY they take your rights away, it only matters that they have. Of course, there are some who are brainwashed, usually people that use drugs themselves... coffee, alcohol, nicotine, but are convinced that the drug war is a good thing and are willing to give up their rights for their perceived safety. Old Ben Franklin had a saying about people like that. Why did you write me again?
27
posted on
02/18/2004 11:00:37 PM PST
by
LaraCroft
(If the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, do the stupid get stupider?)
To: Enterprise
Tobacco, second-hand smoke, meat, fast food, MP3s, ... old people at airports (they could be terrorists).
To: Joe Bonforte
I'd like to know what drugs Walters is taking. I mean it. I bet he and a LOT of cops and drug warriors are doing illegal drugs and using their positions to shield themselves. Just like some of the child porno cops were the biggest purveyors of it. Wonder how much he and his ilk assist in the trafficing of it too?
To: TKDietz
Calling All Economists!!!
I don't know jack about economics....but if the drug war were to be truly successful, and those hundreds of billions of dollars being traded and trickling down were gone....it seems that it would be cause for a global economic wound. Do you think the "powers that be" are aware of this? Dam right. The war on drugs isn't being prosecuted for results because we can't afford the results of a real victory.
Again, though, if a FReeper economist could give me an indication as to what it might be like if the illegal drug trade ceased to exist completely, it would be greatly appreciated.
To: TKDietz
Victory is Just Around the Corner.
31
posted on
02/19/2004 5:34:05 AM PST
by
Imal
(The War on Drugs proves that sobriety does not equal sanity.)
To: TKDietz
America is achieving historic successes in the war on drugs,LOLOLOLOL!
32
posted on
02/19/2004 5:35:44 AM PST
by
OXENinFLA
(Kyle---"Hey Wendy, you're a B**** and Token, Right here pal." (South Park watchers know what I mean))
To: TKDietz
This account makes the classic mistake of assuming that the factors it is concerned with are the reasons for the reduction in use when there are other factors not taken into account and not controlled for.
The most prominent one would be the absence of a leisure drug culture in positions of high office centered on the president and his pals such as Tyson. We will never know the full damage done by the Little Rock orgy and drugs culture that grew up around Clinton and his pals being plugged into the nation's highest offices with all of its defensive, lying accusations (i.e., it wasn't us because we lied about it being the Bush brothers so you would never look at us and then we used our power to make sure the FBI would never be able to use its background-checking power to find out the truth). But it is for sure the case that having George W. and Laura Bush in the White House and a president who actually believes rather than one who swings a Bible as a cover for BJ's with interns has done an enormous amount to reduce drug usage. Further, having a real enemy, an enemy that must be led against to be defeated, with such a President in charge, tends also to elimiinate the moral and spiritual vacuum that leads to much of the drug use contributes.
33
posted on
02/19/2004 5:44:07 AM PST
by
AmericanVictory
(Should we be more like them, or they like us?)
"Former Rep. Bob Barr (search), R-Ga., now a civil liberties advocate, said that on a recent visit to a small West Georgia police department, the chief showed off several shiny new M-16 rifles provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (search)." Oh good. Now I feel safe from all the gang bangers with automatic weapons that roam the streets out here in rural west Georgia.
I wonder if the police will use their own ammo shooting those M-16's off duty at the chiefs spread while drinking up a few beers. (The chiefs nephew works with me and has a big, braggert mouth.)
Comment #35 Removed by Moderator
Comment #36 Removed by Moderator
To: TKDietz
You forgot the "humor alert".
37
posted on
02/19/2004 6:08:37 AM PST
by
JohnGalt
("...but both sides know who the real enemy is, and, my friends, it is us.')
To: Wolfie; vin-one; WindMinstrel; philman_36; Beach_Babe; jenny65; AUgrad; Xenalyte; Bill D. Berger; ..
WOD Ping
38
posted on
02/19/2004 6:16:20 AM PST
by
jmc813
(Help save a life - www.marrow.org)
To: onmyfeet
Then you must believe that Clinton's behavior had no effect upon them. Are you serious?
39
posted on
02/19/2004 6:17:23 AM PST
by
AmericanVictory
(Should we be more like them, or they like us?)
Comment #40 Removed by Moderator
To: TKDietz
The battle against mother nature continues.
BREAKING: Ashcroft swears out a warrant against God for creating cannabis.
41
posted on
02/19/2004 6:26:35 AM PST
by
Sir Gawain
(Republicans give spineless cowards a bad name)
To: onmyfeet
Well, then, we disagree. I believe it is almost impossible to gauge the adverse impact that the behavior of Clinton and his wife and cronies had on this country's young people, as illustrated by incident after incident in classrooms and on schoolbuses as just the tip of the iceberg, not to mention lying and cheating in school becoming the norm rather than the exception as measured by numerous studies.
42
posted on
02/19/2004 6:33:36 AM PST
by
AmericanVictory
(Should we be more like them, or they like us?)
To: onmyfeet
That was the author's spin: "America is achieving historic successes in the war on drugs."Actually, that appears to be the author quoting John Walters.
43
posted on
02/19/2004 6:36:29 AM PST
by
tacticalogic
(Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
To: wireman
Yeah, sure. Maybe if you say it enough somebody will start to believe it.At least until November........
44
posted on
02/19/2004 6:38:16 AM PST
by
tacticalogic
(Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
Comment #45 Removed by Moderator
To: Enterprise
The "addiction" by the Government to taxpayer dollars for massive jobs and perks won't end with the WOD. I was just curious what's next.Something to do with firearms and the internet, I'm sure.
To: TKDietz
Can there be any doubt that Satan is the ruler of this world?
That humans support these vicious governments is the real cause for worry - not whether folks use 'drugs'.
47
posted on
02/19/2004 7:08:41 AM PST
by
headsonpikes
(Spirit of '76 bttt!)
To: takenoprisoner
"You're a starship?" Well, not a starship. In my case, more like an ocean going tug.
48
posted on
02/19/2004 9:13:26 AM PST
by
Enterprise
("Do you know who I am?")
To: af_vet_rr
That is why I posed the question. When the cold war was "won" there was talk of a "peace dividend." I was hopeful that the dividend would be reflected in less taxes. When welfare was reformed, I was hopeful that there would be a "welfare dividend" in the form of less taxes. And now, if we "win" the WOD, I am hopeful of a "WOD" dividend in the form of less taxes. But you, and others already have guessed, that no matter how many problems are "solved" or how many "wars" are "won," the assault on taxpayers will continue unabated, and some new crisis will be manufactured to justify financially bleeding us some more.
49
posted on
02/19/2004 9:19:16 AM PST
by
Enterprise
("Do you know who I am?")
To: af_vet_rr
NewsMax.com Wires
Thursday, Feb. 19, 2004
"MOSCOW Russia has successfully tested a hypersonic weapon capable of penetrating any prospective missile shield, a senior general said Thursday.
The prototype weapon proved it could maneuver so quickly as to make "any missile defense useless," Col.-Gen. Yuri Baluyevsky, the first deputy chief of the General Staff of the Russian armed forces, said at a news conference."
Well, THAT didn't take long did it? I guess we know where the next round of taxpayer dollars is gong.
50
posted on
02/19/2004 9:24:32 AM PST
by
Enterprise
("Do you know who I am?")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-97 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson