Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Adm. Moorer's Last Warning
newsmax.com ^ | Feb. 7, 2004 | Christopher Ruddy

Posted on 02/10/2004 4:06:28 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe

It is a sad day for America when a national giant passes.

Adm. Thomas Moorer, of Eufaula, Ala., was such a giant.

His passing this week is especially sad for me. Adm. Moorer was a friend, adviser and member of the board of directors of NewsMax.com's parent company, NewsMax Media, Inc.

Adm. Moorer was a man "in the arena," as Theodore Roosevelt would have described him. Even at the age of 91, the admiral had kept quite active in public affairs.

This dynamo of a man made his first landing on an aircraft carrier in 1935. I don't think I need to detail the dangers of such landings without the instrumentation of today's planes.

It was one of his hallmarks that he did not know fear. Thankfully, America produces such people.

During his life, Moorer had numerous brushes with death. He was there on Dec. 7, 1941, when the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor.

As a combat pilot during the war, his plane was shot down over the South Pacific. Fortunately, he was rescued by a cargo supply ship.

This episode would have been a great story in itself. But it gets more interesting. The supply ship that rescued him was carrying ordnance and explosives. When Japanese planes began bombing the supply ship, Moorer and a handful of others realized it would be better to abandon the ship early.

Most of the crew didn't see it the same way as Moorer and stayed. Moorer entered the lifeboat while most stayed aboard. The ship exploded and almost the entire crew was lost.

Once again, for the second time in a matter of days, Moorer was adrift in the great Pacific in a tiny lifeboat. Miraculously, he and the survivors made it to a deserted island where he was discovered by an Australian airplane. For his heroism, Moorer was awarded both the Silver Star and the Purple Heart.

I tell this story about Moorer in the South Pacific and his decision to evacuate the supply ship when most others would not because it illustrates a great deal about the man.

Moorer had a certain clarity of thinking, a thinking that saw things as they are and how they might be. He could see things over the horizon. He also had the courage to go against perceived wisdom, make decisions and act on them.

That was what struck me about Adm. Moorer: Even at the advanced age of 91, he still possessed this certain clarity of vision.

His Plan Ended Vietnam

I remember speaking to him in the hours after the events of Sept. 11. He told me that the American people would soon forget about the tragedy and would not learn from it. He said he had seen this time and again. We don't learn from these things, he told me. I was flabbergasted, but he was right: The complacency is here today.

Adm. Moorer was full of anecdotes about his years in military service, his dealings with presidents, and his service as the nation's highest-ranking military official, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Adm. Moorer was chairman of the Joint Chiefs during the divisive days of the Vietnam War. The war was vexing for him, as it was for many Americans. He was even more anxious because he believed the conflict could have been ended quickly, with fewer casualties and more favorably to U.S. interests.

But the politicians were not letting the military do their job. The days of FDR deferring to Gen. Marshall and the military were over.

Adm. Moorer's advice to President Richard Nixon was simple: Bomb North Vietnam's infrastructure in and around Hanoi and mine North Vietnam's key ports. This would effectively cut them off and force them to end the war.

Despite all of Lyndon Johnson's carpet-bombing, the Pentagon had always been limited to secondary targets that had little effect in undermining North Vietnam's war effort.

Nixon told Adm. Moorer that he would not agree. Nixon was worried that if the U.S. were too bold, the Chinese would join the war and perhaps ignite a global conflagration.

Also, Nixon was concerned about the American POWs held by the North. The State Department warned that if the U.S. stepped up the war, the POWs would suffer more.

Adm. Moorer told Nixon that China would not enter the war and that once the North Vietnamese understood our new resolve, the treatment of the POWs would actually improve.

By 1972, however, the war had been in progress for seven years and American policies had failed. Hanoi had agreed to peace talks in Paris, but the communists were intransigent.

As Adm. Moorer recounted to me, a frustrated Nixon suddenly summoned Moorer. At the time, the admiral was on a military jet heading to Europe for a NATO meeting. The plane made an immediate U-turn over the Atlantic and returned to Washington.

Moorer told me that Nixon was at Camp David, in one of the retreat's rooms, with a longtime friend. Nixon asked what Moorer thought they should do.

He told them bluntly: Bomb North Vietnam as they had never done before.

Nixon, nervously, gave Moorer the OK.

Beginning on Dec. 18, 1972, the U.S. unleashed the largest, most concentrated bombing campaign in its history -- the campaign was dubbed "the Christmas bombings." For nearly two weeks U.S. pilots flew almost 4,000 sorties. B-52s were brought in and flew more than 700 bombing runs over key North Vietnam targets.

Within days the Vietnamese were suing for peace. And as Moorer recalled, the POWs later reported that their Vietnam captors, frightened by American power, began treating them more benignly.

Adm. Moorer's plan, heeded belatedly, brought an end to the nightmare of Vietnam.

Last Warning: China

When I saw Adm. Moorer in Washington at a luncheon just a few months ago, I introduced him by saying, "Admiral Moorer may have retired from the military, but he never retired from America."

After leaving the Joint Chiefs, Moorer began an active business and political life.

During the late '70s, he was the one of President Carter's strongest critics for having forsaken the shah of Iran and allowing the Soviet Union to go unchallenged after invading Afghanistan.

Notably, Adm. Moorer was also a sharp critic of Carter's treaty to transfer the Panama Canal to the Panamanian government.

In recent years, the admiral recalled to me his testimony to the U.S. Senate opposing the Panama giveaway. He told the Senate that if the U.S. left Panama, the Soviet Union or another communist power would fill the vacuum created by America's departure.

As a military and navy man, Adm. Moorer understood the strategic importance of shipping. As one who understood the Pacific theater, he knew a war in Korea or elsewhere in Asia required the U.S. to have unimpeded access through the canal. In a serious conflict, days could be crucial. Only an American military presence near the canal could guarantee such access.

The U.S. Senate did not agree and gave President Carter the OK to sign the Panama Canal Treaty.

But the clear-thinking Moorer turned out to be right. A communist power filled the gap when the Panamanians gave Hutchison Whampoa, a Chinese company, operational control over the canal.

Adm. Moorer said that when he warned the Senate that some communist power would fill the vacuum in Panama he never, in his wildest dreams, thought that country would be China.

In his closing years, Moorer's singular worry was China. He believed that Red China was using front companies like Hutchison to set up strategic bases near key "choke points" for control over shipping lanes. He was also quite disturbed that China's Hutchison had taken control of the port in Freeport, the Bahamas – just 60 miles from Florida.

Moorer saw China's demand for Taiwan as just one reason the Chinese may go to war sometime in the future with the U.S. There was also a struggle for hegemony over Asia. And he never bought the notion that Beijing's ideological Maoists had any intention of remaking China into a democracy.

Inevitably, he argued, China would be in a conflict with the United States.

China's enormous population made this likely and worrisome. Adm. Moorer's concern was that Chinese leaders might some day believe they could absorb a nuclear attack, lose 200 million people and still have 800 million left. The U.S. could not withstand such a loss. China's population made naught the concept of mutually assured destruction – which had helped maintain lukewarm peace with Russia for decades.

So, when we honor and remember this great warrior, we should remember his last warning: Beware of China. To the very end, this heroic American was looking out for his country with his certain clarity of thinking.


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: beware; china; hristopherruddy; panama; redchina; thomasmoorer; tribute

1 posted on 02/10/2004 4:06:29 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
I have admired Admiral Moorer as long as I knew who he was.

The only person I know of in public life in my lifetime who has never been wrong.

2 posted on 02/10/2004 4:18:37 PM PST by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Excellent article, TJ.

Moorer will be proved a prophet.
3 posted on 02/10/2004 4:23:13 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
This country will badly misss this great man.
4 posted on 02/10/2004 4:34:30 PM PST by Gritty ("We are in a race for civilization like none other since World War II"-Victor Davis Hanson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
The country - no, make that the western world - needs more of his ilk.

Rest in Peace, Wise One.
5 posted on 02/10/2004 4:53:44 PM PST by KangarooJacqui (Deliver us from evil... vote Conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Inevitably, he argued, China would be in a conflict with the United States. China's enormous population made this likely and worrisome. Adm. Moorer's concern was that Chinese leaders might some day believe they could absorb a nuclear attack, lose 200 million people and still have 800 million left.

The U.S. could not withstand such a loss. China's population made naught the concept of mutually assured destruction ? which had helped maintain lukewarm peace with Russia for decades.

Population centers. They're no more immune to 1000+ nukes than anyone else.

6 posted on 02/10/2004 4:59:24 PM PST by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yarddog
What about Moorer's spying on Kissinger and leaking word of the "tilt to Pakistan" because the Navy preferred India, with its long coastline? This showed Moorer to be insubordinate and narrowly parochial. Here's one summary:

http://hnn.us/roundup/16.html

In 1970 the Joint Chiefs of Staff, frustrated with Nixon's and Kissinger's penchant for secrecy, began spying on the executive branch. At the order of Admiral Thomas Moorer, Navy yeoman Charles Edward Radford, began Xeroxing secret documents from the National Security Council, where he was posted. He copied more than 5,000 documents. According to historian Melvin Small, Radford boasted that he "took so darn much stuff I can't remember what it was." Defense Secretary Melvin Laird was unaware of the spying. Al Haig was, according to a statement provided by Robert O. Welander, the chiefs' liaison with the NSC who transmitted the orders from Moorer to Radford.

In December 1971 Kissinger's tilt toward Pakistan in the India-Pakistan war was revealed in a column by Jack Anderson. The infamous Plumbers investigated, discovering the spy ring involving Moorer, Welander and Radford. Radford insisted he was not the source of the leak to Anderson, but admitted spying on behalf of the joint chiefs of staff.

When told about the spy ring, Nixon threatened to put Moorer, Radford and Welander in jail. But upon reflection he chose to do nothing, though Radford was transferred from the White House. A few months later he reappointed Moorer as head of the joint chiefs of staff. Small speculates that by leaving Moorer in place Nixon felt he could exercise leverage against the admiral. The story remained secret until the Watergate investigation in 1973.

7 posted on 02/10/2004 5:58:30 PM PST by DWPittelli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DWPittelli
I will have to admit that I am not familiar with that accusation.

If it is true, I would like to know more details etc. before deciding Moorer was wrong.

I have seen him many times on different news shows and read his statements in newspapers, magazines and other news outlets and have never, not even once, disagreed with anything he said.

8 posted on 02/10/2004 6:12:25 PM PST by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DWPittelli
I read about the Moorer-Radford-Haig spy affair in several books, including the Bob Woodward book and "Silent Coup." If I remember correctly, the antipathy of the military/intelligence community toward Nixon was supposed to be the underlying reason for the Watergate break-in (where several high level CIA operatives participated in a "third rate burglary") and the forced resignation of Nixon.

Admiral Moorer may have been a fine man, but he was very much a part of the military/intelligence community which put itself above and in charge of presidents and Congress time and time again.
9 posted on 02/10/2004 7:59:57 PM PST by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima
I read about the Moorer-Radford-Haig spy affair in several books, including the Bob Woodward book and "Silent Coup." If I remember correctly, the antipathy of the military/intelligence community toward Nixon was supposed to be the underlying reason for the Watergate break-in (where several high level CIA operatives participated in a "third rate burglary") and the forced resignation of Nixon.

Admiral Moorer may have been a fine man, but he was very much a part of the military/intelligence community which put itself above and in charge of presidents and Congress time and time again.

Too bad Admiral Moorer ... and those of his ilk ... lost to the politicians. Had they succeeded in guiding events for the last 30 years, we would still have a country.

10 posted on 02/10/2004 9:20:37 PM PST by Check6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3
Population centers. They're no more immune to 1000+ nukes than anyone else.

True, but the late Admiral is absolutely right that we have to adapt our western-tuned minds to get in the minds of people who do think of their people as "masses" and plan their military strategy as such.

I think that MAD kept the world stable during the second half of the 20th century because the Soviets and the US were basically humane people, each believing very strongly in our respective systems.

He correctly foresaw the next challenge for the US: how to defeat the new bear, the new bear that doesn't value life the way we do.

11 posted on 02/10/2004 9:28:18 PM PST by krb (the statement on the other side of this tagline is false)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
May God bless Admiral Moorer.
12 posted on 02/10/2004 9:35:57 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
MacArthur tried to save us in Korea--but Truman wouldn't let him. WOnderful!!
13 posted on 02/10/2004 9:50:10 PM PST by faithincowboys ( Zell Miller is the only DC Democrat not committing treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Is there any doubt that Jimmy Carter was the worst President this nation ever had, he simply had (and has)to be a Communist agent.
14 posted on 02/10/2004 9:52:51 PM PST by faithincowboys ( Zell Miller is the only DC Democrat not committing treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: faithincowboys
He has the distinction of giving away the Panama Canal. It was bad enough that he lost Iran and that he didn't oppose the Russians in Afghanistan and that he let the hostage situation drag out for over 400 days and that he lost a number of troops in his hastily prepared "rescue attempt" in desert one.

But he violated every common sense principle of national security, and it was entirely unnessary, when he gave away the canal.

His behavior now says he's an internationalist of the worst sort -- world socialist definitely. He probably was then, too.
15 posted on 02/10/2004 10:11:57 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: xzins
And to think, there are millions of Americans who don't know the disaster of a President he was.
16 posted on 02/10/2004 10:14:42 PM PST by faithincowboys ( Zell Miller is the only DC Democrat not committing treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: krb
I think that MAD kept the world stable during the second half of the 20th century because the Soviets and the US were basically humane people, each believing very strongly in our respective systems.

I disagree, the only reason Chinese communism killed more people than Russian communism was because it was working from a larger base. In percentage terms, the Chinese are likely to prove more 'humane'.

17 posted on 02/11/2004 6:42:26 AM PST by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson