Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Kyoto Protocol
The Federalist Newsletter | 2-6-04 | The Federalist Staff

Posted on 02/06/2004 10:59:14 AM PST by FlyLow

The Kyoto Protocol, that international environmental treaty to limit "greenhouse emissions," will cost Canada an estimated $1 billion this year alone, and $4,700 per taxpayer per year for the next five years, according to The Heartland Institute's Dr. Kenneth Green -- and that's to meet only the first 8% of Canada's emission-reduction requirements. "Of course, that's probably a low estimate, since some studies suggest even higher compliance costs for industry; other forms of taxation increase the cost of raising money; and it's likely to cost more for each succeeding set of reductions," says Green. "While the first 8% might cost $1 billion, the next 8% is likely to cost more, and so on with each succeeding step toward the target." The Kyoto Protocol was originally signed by then-President Clinton but was subsequently rejected by the Senate, 95-0, in an eye-popping display of bipartisanship. Now we know why


TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: kyoto; kyotoprotocol; thefederalist

1 posted on 02/06/2004 10:59:15 AM PST by FlyLow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FlyLow
The Kyoto Protocol was originally signed by then-President Clinton but was subsequently rejected by the Senate, 95-0, in an eye-popping display of bipartisanship. Now we know why

Gore signed it and it was never brought to the Senate. The Senate vote was a pre-emptive strike to stop Gore from signing a stupid treaty that was not in the best interest of the country.

2 posted on 02/06/2004 11:03:02 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlyLow
The Kyoto Protocol was originally signed by then-President Clinton but was subsequently rejected by the Senate, 95-0, in an eye-popping display of bipartisanship. Now we know why

By the US Constitution, presidents can not approve treaties. That right is reserved for the senate. Clinton signing this treaty added absolutely no legitimacy to it.

3 posted on 02/06/2004 11:12:29 AM PST by 2banana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
Clinton signing this treaty added absolutely no legitimacy to it.

You're correct. And, BTW, very seldom do the words "Clinton" and "legitimacy" occur in the same sentence. Well done.

4 posted on 02/06/2004 11:15:29 AM PST by theDentist (Boston: So much Liberty, you can buy a Politician already owned by someone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: theDentist
He signed checks from the Red Chinese, too.
5 posted on 02/06/2004 11:29:17 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FlyLow
The Kyoto Protocol was originally signed by then-President Clinton but was subsequently rejected by the Senate, 95-0, in an eye-popping display of bipartisanship.

Wrong, Kyoto has never been up for a vote. What was passed was a resolution opposing Kyoto if its economic costs were disproportionately imposed on the US.

Until the US President formally sends the Kyoto protocol to the Senate for approval, it will continue to hang around waiting for a Democrat dominated Senate. Bush has not killed the Kyoto Protocol. He refuses to implement, but he has not formally killed it, that requires a Senate vote.

6 posted on 02/06/2004 11:53:52 AM PST by ExpandNATO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExpandNATO

Correct.

Bush needs to send it to the Senate for approval, right around May.
7 posted on 02/06/2004 11:57:28 AM PST by MonroeDNA (Soros is the enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ExpandNATO
Bush has not killed the Kyoto Protocol.

Correct. It was the treaty creating the ICC that President Bush unsigned.

8 posted on 02/06/2004 11:58:01 AM PST by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson