To: keri; international american; Kay Soze; jpsb; Capitalist Eric; hershey; TomInNJ; dagnabbit; ...
""Including illegal Mexican workers in our Social Security System will add untold billions of dollars in future liabilities. The September 2003 GAO Report basically says the cost estimates being used by the Treasury Department and the Social Security Administration are not founded in actuarial realities. Among the many questions raised by the GAO, most challenge the adequacy or the SSAs analysis of future costs." I don't like this. Initially, Bush balked at endorsing concurrent receipt benefits for disabled U.S. military veterans because it would cost too much.
Where is the same concern when it comes to granting social security benefits to illegal migrants from another country?
3 posted on
01/29/2004 5:51:08 AM PST by
Happy2BMe
(U.S. borders - Controlled by CORRUPT Politicians and Slave-Labor Employers)
To: Happy2BMe
Bush balked at endorsing concurrent receipt benefits for disabled U.S. military veterans because it would cost too much. Where is the same concern when it comes to granting social security benefits to illegal migrants from another country?Don't worry about it. It the (occasional) conservative Rhetoric that counts, not the actions.
17 posted on
01/29/2004 6:47:43 AM PST by
templar
To: Happy2BMe
I don't like this. Initially, Bush balked at endorsing concurrent receipt benefits for disabled U.S. military veterans because it would cost too much.Where is the same concern when it comes to granting social security benefits to illegal migrants from another country?
It goes like this:
The mexican illegals bring their culture, their values, their hopes and dreams to America. The disabled American veterans, on the other hand, have served their purpose. Screw 'em.
Thus spracht Rovathustra.
92 posted on
01/30/2004 6:30:02 AM PST by
Don Joe
("Bush owes the 'base' nothing." --Texasforever, 01/28/2004)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson