What is going on? Republicans have been working for at least 10 years to Kill this Department and De-Fund it. Now why is Bush set to increase it to it's highest levels in 20 years? It is this kind of idiocy from Bush that makes me wonder what he, and of course Rove, are thinking. Spending is up under Bush, all these new programs he is proposing, like the Prescription Drug bill, are exploding federal spending all out of control. My God if I want Nanny State care and massive spending I can vote for Democrats. Where in the Hell is the Republican Leadeship on this? There ain't going to be any Hollywood votes for this and this really is pandering to the lowest degree along with the Immigration idea!!!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-96 next last
To: Captain Peter Blood
It's called "triangulation". Worked like a charm for Clinton.
I'd hoped for better from President Bush.
2 posted on
01/28/2004 6:20:13 PM PST by
MamaLucci
To: Captain Peter Blood
Disgusting, if true.
3 posted on
01/28/2004 6:20:24 PM PST by
Enterprise
("You sit down. You had your say. Now I'm going to have my say.")
To: Captain Peter Blood
Bump.
4 posted on
01/28/2004 6:21:13 PM PST by
Bernard Marx
(In theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice there is.)
To: Captain Peter Blood
Well, let's wait to see what exactly is in it.
After all the "biggest increase in twenty years" might amount to a few million dollars.
It might also be used to fund patriotic art or propaganda efforts overseas.
It won't be put exactly that way, of course- but something like that.
In any case, within the scheme of the Federal Budget, whatever is proposed will be pocket change.
To: Captain Peter Blood
If this story is accurate, it's a strategic error on the part of the White House.
6 posted on
01/28/2004 6:21:19 PM PST by
Dog Gone
To: Captain Peter Blood
Why is he torturing us like this? Why? It makes no sense. If I go with me thesis that you can't say Bush is a man of conscience about the war, but does other things purely out of political motivation. So is this really his conscience? If so, I truly need to rethink him. I know, what's the alternative...but it's getting harder and harder to make my mouth say those words.
7 posted on
01/28/2004 6:21:24 PM PST by
Hildy
To: Captain Peter Blood; Travis McGee
No.. conservatives want to kill the endowment.... Republicans want to be re-elected more than anything else.
Its party over principle
8 posted on
01/28/2004 6:21:37 PM PST by
GeronL
(Two kinds of people in this country: Makers and Takers........ which are you?)
To: Captain Peter Blood
Mr President, we have this little thing called the deficit.
I'm not trying to be some anti-Bush guy like some people around here are, but this is the type of worthless spending that is just not needed.
What happened to 1% growth in non-defense non-homeland security spending?
9 posted on
01/28/2004 6:21:40 PM PST by
RWR8189
(Its Morning in America Again!)
To: Captain Peter Blood
Of course, earlier in the week there was a rumor he wanted to LIMIT spending.... I knew it wasn't true
12 posted on
01/28/2004 6:22:24 PM PST by
GeronL
(Two kinds of people in this country: Makers and Takers........ which are you?)
To: Captain Peter Blood; Carry_Okie; forester; sasquatch; B4Ranch; SierraWasp; hedgetrimmer; ...
Who are the Democrats in the race again?
13 posted on
01/28/2004 6:22:34 PM PST by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: Captain Peter Blood
Call me naive, ignorant, or both, but what the hell is the national endowment for the arts?
To: Captain Peter Blood
Is bush a closet socialist?
21 posted on
01/28/2004 6:27:20 PM PST by
tubavil
To: Captain Peter Blood
Sick.....just sick!!
24 posted on
01/28/2004 6:27:39 PM PST by
pollywog
(Psalm 121;1 I Lift mine eyes to the hills from whence cometh my help.)
To: Captain Peter Blood
Talk about welfare for the rich! N.E.A. Is nothing but funding to allow the rich to indulge their hobbies at the expense of the taxpayers. At least that is what the left will call it now that a republican wants to fund it.
25 posted on
01/28/2004 6:27:42 PM PST by
Boiling point
(Too well informed to be a democrat)
To: Captain Peter Blood
Yup the pubbies are sure conservative aren't they big education increases, cfr, now this.
Oh well where are the conservatives going to go, conservatives have become the demo rat blacks of the pubbie party.
27 posted on
01/28/2004 6:27:59 PM PST by
dts32041
("Taxes are not levied for the benefit of the taxed" RAH)
To: Captain Peter Blood
I think he is trying to soften them, but he needs to understand that it's appeasement.
I actually think the libs will say this is irresponsible in a time of deficits. In some ways, I see the intelligence of this, but I think he could have put the money towards Pell grants.
29 posted on
01/28/2004 6:28:03 PM PST by
faithincowboys
( Zell Miller is the only DC Democrat not committing treason.)
To: Captain Peter Blood
They need more money for the illegal alien undocumented worker artists to create more perverted art. Just doing the preverted things normal Americans don't want.
31 posted on
01/28/2004 6:28:32 PM PST by
Beck_isright
("Those who stand for nothing fall for anything."-Alexander Hamilton)
To: Captain Peter Blood
Just be a good little Bushbot and keep repeating:
"Bush can do no wrong,...."
"Bush can do no wrong,..."
36 posted on
01/28/2004 6:29:04 PM PST by
Merdoug
To: Captain Peter Blood
Because Bush is not a Conservative. He is a republican.
To: Captain Peter Blood
Just when I come around to the idea of voting for Bush again, he goes and does something I despise...
If this is true, then I give up on America.
42 posted on
01/28/2004 6:30:42 PM PST by
freedomcrusader
(Proudly wearing the politically incorrect label "crusader" since 1/29/2001)
To: Captain Peter Blood
Republicans have been working for at least 10 years to Kill this Department and De-Fund it.Oldthink, Cap'n. We need to reach out to the aspiring Mapplethorpes, Annie Sprinkles, and Joel Peter Witkins and win 'em with a little tax funded compassion. Why art would cease to be produced without NEA funding; your mind ain't right.
Yeah, /sarcasm.
43 posted on
01/28/2004 6:30:58 PM PST by
Old Fud
To: Captain Peter Blood
Shhh....
Its better then the Democratic opinion on the matter /sarcasm
45 posted on
01/28/2004 6:31:56 PM PST by
yonif
("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
To: Captain Peter Blood
Hopefully Congress will just say "no." Loudly and clearly.
47 posted on
01/28/2004 6:32:11 PM PST by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: Captain Peter Blood
It's all part of Bush's shrewd strategy to shrink the federal government. Anyway, I suppose you'd like Kerry better? < /bot>
58 posted on
01/28/2004 6:34:47 PM PST by
Sloth
("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, 'Zoolander')
To: All
Alright, if this is true, I am not going to support Bush on this one. It will be disgusting if true.
What the hell will he do next, give the biggest increase in decades to PBS?
Golly.
63 posted on
01/28/2004 6:36:05 PM PST by
rwfromkansas
("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
To: Captain Peter Blood
The 1996 GOP platform called for abolishing the Department of Education and ending "federal meddling in schools.", it also called for eliminating the departments of Commerce, Energy, and Housing and Urban Development and the National Endowment for the Arts.
They removed all of this from the GOP platform in 2000, and have been moving further to the left ever since.
The $56 billion in total discretionary funding for federal education is an all-time high. Under President Bush, in just three years the Education Departments overall funding will have increased by $13.8 billion.
Federal education spending has increased by 118 percent from 1996 (the first fiscal year under a Republican majority in Congress) to 2002. The Presidents FY 2004 builds on that increase.
74 posted on
01/28/2004 6:38:39 PM PST by
jgrubbs
To: Captain Peter Blood
Maybe it's a grant to CMT and the "Speed Channel."
To: Captain Peter Blood
Oh Geez .. well here is one that I disagree with
Please tell me this doesn't this mean I lose my Bushbot status ... its been a bad day and I couldn't take any more bad news
80 posted on
01/28/2004 6:39:34 PM PST by
Mo1
(Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
To: Captain Peter Blood
This is Crap (Of the same sort that showed up on a religious work masquerading as ART!)
I believe art is terribly important to us but in this PC world, if we have to accept and promote garbage....No Thanks!
84 posted on
01/28/2004 6:40:00 PM PST by
FixitGuy
To: Captain Peter Blood
We'll see, but this is a mistake if true.
To: Captain Peter Blood
I bet the so called funding increase here is smaller than the 50 million dollar project for a "Rain Forest" build in the middle of Iowa! I'd rather to see the increase of NEA than to build a silly "Rain Forest" within a greenhouse in Iowa! What's next, a tropical fish museum in Alaska?
94 posted on
01/28/2004 6:41:45 PM PST by
FRgal4u
To: Captain Peter Blood
This is just another reason I will NOT be voting for Bush again. I will stay home. At the rate he is spending our money, I will not be able to afford the time from work to go vote. More reasons are as follows..
Kennedy education bill.
Immigration amnesty plan.
Failure to protect our borders.
Failure to veto a single pork filled appropriation bill.
Failure to recess appoint his blocked judges.(except 1)
Failure to deport illegals when caught.
Rx drug plan for ALL seniors. Not just the poor as it should be.
Failure to reduce our energy depedence on the Saudis. A threat to our national security, in my opinion.
Failure to reverse Clintons executive orders of huge land grabs all over the country.
I could go on but i'm getting nauseous.
To: Captain Peter Blood
So far, Bush hasn't encountered a spending cause that he didn't work to increase. With regard to discretionary spending, GW's administration will go down in history as the most profligate spenders of all time, besting the wildest dreams of the "tax and spend" democrats. What are they thinking? Who the hell knows. Conservatives they are certainly NOT.
113 posted on
01/28/2004 6:45:16 PM PST by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Any day you wake up is a good day.)
To: Captain Peter Blood

I love Bush, but this is one program I have to join the bashers on.
The NEA must go. Period. There should be no place for "state art" in America. Shades of Stalinoid paintings of Happy Factory workers. Besides, the arts crowd hates his guts and wants to send him back to Texas.
Tom DeLay! Kill this monstrosity. Now!
Be Seeing You,
Chris
117 posted on
01/28/2004 6:45:30 PM PST by
section9
(Major Motoko Kusanagi says, "I have John Kerry's medals! No, really, their in my purse!")
To: Captain Peter Blood
When the pudlickers fund raisers call me I tell them quit hispandering and spending. I haven't encountered one yet who can give any reason to vote for a pud except for their party affiliation. In NV we have a pudlickin senator named ensign who is trying to get hairy reid's son (who is to the left of Lenin) onto the bench. I was hit up for money to replace hairy but, the person calling didn't even know who the puds wanted to replace him with!
122 posted on
01/28/2004 6:47:27 PM PST by
Righty1
(N)
To: Captain Peter Blood
This is stupid.
129 posted on
01/28/2004 6:48:30 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Captain Peter Blood
What is the actual size of the National Arts program? Are we looking at something significant? I don't approve of funding individual artists of either painting or sculpting with federal money. I don't mind the national symphony orchestra or the national ballet or even the national opera if we have those things.
135 posted on
01/28/2004 6:49:40 PM PST by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
To: Captain Peter Blood
How much did we spend on the National Endowment for the Arts last year? How big a deal can this possibly be?
138 posted on
01/28/2004 6:50:25 PM PST by
Scenic Sounds
(Sí, estamos libres sonreír otra vez - ahora y siempre.)
To: Captain Peter Blood
Hello, my name is George W. Bush, and I have a spending problem.
To: Captain Peter Blood; Tumbleweed_Connection; Sci Fi Guy; x; Reagan Man; Heartbreak of Psoriasis; ...
BUSH TO SEEK BIG BUDGET INCREASE FOR NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTS!
CONSERVATIVE - MODERATE - LIBERAL - CINO - RINO - PING!
174 posted on
01/28/2004 6:58:30 PM PST by
Happy2BMe
(U.S. borders - Controlled by CORRUPT Politicians and Slave-Labor Employers)
To: Captain Peter Blood
I'm getting in line for money. I can draw stick figure people. I'm an artist and I need a million dollars to share my "gift" with the world. I can also stand back and throw globs of paint at a huge canvas and "express" my vision of color. I am worthy to receive a large check to pursue my artistic passion. You other people simply do not see what I see through my artist's eyes. For a mere seven figure check, I'll share it with you.
To: Captain Peter Blood
NATIONAL ENDOWMENT OF THE ARTS
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
SUMMARY OF FUNDS AVAILABLE FY 2002
Program and State Grant Funds $78,835,000
Challenge America $17,000,000
Total Federal Appropriations $95,835,000
Fiscal Year Total Funds
1966 $ 2,898,308
1967 $ 8,475,692
1968 $ 7,774,291
1969 $ 8,456,875
1970 $ 9,055,000
1971 $ 16,420,000
1972 $ 31,480,000
1973 $ 40,857,000
1974 $ 64,025,000
1975 $ 80,142,000
1976 $ 87,455,000
1976T* $ 35,301,000
1977 $ 99,872,000
1978 $123,850,000
1979 $149,585,000
1980 $154,610,000
1981 $158,795,000
1982 $143,456,000
1983 $143,875,000
1984 $162,223,000
1985 $163,660,000
1986 $158,822,240
1987 $165,281,000
1988 $167,731,000
1989 $169,090,000
1990 $171,255,000
1991 $174,080,737
1992 $175,954,680
1993 $174,459,382
1994 $170,228,000
1995 $162,311,000
1996 $ 99,470,000
1997 $ 99,494,000
1998 $ 98,000,000
1999 $ 97,966,000
2000 $97,627,600
2001 $104,769,000
2002 $115,220,000
* In 1976, the Federal government changed the beginning of the fiscal year from
July 1 to October 1, hence the 1976 Transition (T) Quarter.
203 posted on
01/28/2004 7:05:29 PM PST by
spodefly
(This is my tagline. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
To: Captain Peter Blood
THIS SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!! WHEN ARE THOSE JACKASSES IN WASHINGTOM GOING TO SEE THIS! WE ARE SICK AND TIRED OF SEEING OUR TAX DOLLARS GOING TO SUPPORT SMUT?
To: Captain Peter Blood
I just came on line after hearing this news on the radio. I have not read the thread yet, but I can say one thing...I am MAD !!
Are there no standards left to fight for Mr. Bush ? Just WHAT DO YOU STAND FOR ?
The same old statements made in post after post on subjects questioning Pres. Bush, that it is better than the alternative, are getting more and more meaningless to me.
IS THERE ANY PERSON LEFT IN THE WORLD THAT WILL STAND FOR WHAT IS RIGHT?
....or should I just throw another $$ at the artist that took the cross and dumped it in a jar of URINE ?????????????
240 posted on
01/28/2004 7:12:29 PM PST by
Neenah
("It's Always Something!")
To: Captain Peter Blood
Bush is insulting us, that's what's going on. He's apparently decided he doesn't need us.
To boost the NEA is not a major budget item, but it represents a direct slap in the face for conservatives, who have spent years demonizing it as the evil force it is.
To: Captain Peter Blood
>> What is going on?
Bush has gone nuts.
To: Captain Peter Blood
The road to reelection is not paved with the pissed-off bodies of the core conservative constituency. I wish someone would tell the White House that....At this rate, so many of us are gonna get pissed off that Bush will have to hang up any realistic possibility of reelection.
And if it happens, Bush will have no one to blame but himself.
248 posted on
01/28/2004 7:14:26 PM PST by
mhking
To: TheAngryClam
Bush is a Conservative Ping.
255 posted on
01/28/2004 7:16:30 PM PST by
ambrose
To: Captain Peter Blood
260 posts in 60 minutes! Who spilled the catnip around here?!
261 posted on
01/28/2004 7:19:01 PM PST by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
To: Captain Peter Blood
I think Ronald Reagan appointed Lynn Cheney as the director for the Nat'l Endowment for the Arts during his time in office. Perhaps, Dubya will increase the budget and put a patriotic conservative at the helm so that the money is used wisely.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-96 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson