[Z-28]

Sounds good to me... even if there is not any so-called "Global Warming," we get more American oil.

[Waco]

Dry ice,,,,,,

[Wonder Warthog]

"That's not true of other mechanisms," she said. "If you grow more (trees, which consume carbon dioxide) how do you assure it doesn't all go up in a forest fire or that another generation decides to go ahead and farm that area?"

Easy---you make paper out of it, and bury it in landfills.

STOP GLOBAL WARMING---DON'T RECYCLE PAPER!!!!

[Bad Dog2]

If the C02 pumped undergroud did manage to leak into the aquifier you would have --- Carbonated Water! Quick, notify all of the softdrink manaufacturers!

[capt. norm]

""(Carbon dioxide) is the primary global greenhouse gas "

Carbon dioxide is NOT the primary greenhouse gas. Water vapor is, and the global warmers hate to admit it because it draws attention to the stupidity of their theories.

The computer models cannot handle water vapor (or any part of the water cycle) because it would take a lot more computing power and a lot more data input world-wide to deal with it correctly. Neither will be available any time soon.

Nothing in the atmosphere can store heat anywhere nearly as efficiently as the water molecule. People who use humidifiers with their heat in winter readily notice that the humidified air holds heat much better than dry air.

This is one of the priciples that drives weather mechanisms on this planet and yet the global warming models are unable to deal with water vapor (and clouds which are part of the water vapor cycle)

The global warmers have to tell us that water vapor and clouds have no effect but carbon dioxide does. That is exactly upside-down from reality.

What we have are some scientists who have to come up with results showing global warming or they will lose their jobs/grants and so they dutifully produce computer models which produce the results that they were designed to produce.

[GladesGuru]

Oh No!!

They're giving Holy Mother Gaia a terrible case of gas!

[TheBattman]

bump for later.

[jslade]

CO2-IT'S PLANT FOOD STUPID!

[sergeantdave]

What a great idea.

Maybe next when the Mississippi River floods, we can make ice cubes from the floodwaters and ship the cubes to the Arctic before it ruins homes and farms.

[farmfriend]

Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.

[Redcloak]

One would think that the "Establishment Clause" of the 1st Amendment would prohibit such a project.

[Centurion2000]

Some environmentalists worry about gas bubbling through cracks in the Earth or leaking into aquifers that supply drinking water.

What idiots .. in 50 years someone would probably pay for natural seltzer.

[RightWhale]

"(Carbon dioxide) is the primary global greenhouse gas and it's growing rapidly," said Dag Nummedal

He refers to the funding for CO2 projects. It's the primary global greenhouse gas funding center.

[TheBattman]

During the last four or five years the international consensus is that the most rational, economic and environmentally benign way of getting CO2 out of the atmosphere is to store it underground.

Yep, going with international consensus has really done us a lot of good lately, hasn't it?

Ummm...CO2 is a natural substance. When allowed to do their job, plants, trees, and other vegitation helps to cycle this stuff. From what I remember, the oceans themselves play a major roll in the CO2 cycle.

I just don't see how the process of liquifying the stuff and pumping it 300 miles and into old oil wells is considered an "efficient" way of disposing of this "greenhouse" gas.

[Z-28]

This is too easy to be a viable solution... isn't it?