1 posted on
01/22/2004 2:17:50 AM PST by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Strategery redux
To: kattracks; FairOpinion; Pro-Bush; BagCamAddict; ganeshpuri89; pokerbuddy0; cgk; Sabertooth; ...
3 posted on
01/22/2004 2:44:01 AM PST by
JustPiper
(Register Republican BUT Write-In Tancredo for March !!!!)
To: kattracks
Operation Roach Motel seems to be working.
5 posted on
01/22/2004 2:51:51 AM PST by
Hugin
To: kattracks
How will Ketchup-Boy spin this?
I'm dying in antici.... pation.
To: kattracks
al Qaeda's biweekly Internet magazine Sawt al-Jihad, or "Voice of Jihad,"
With links to DU
To: kattracks
Do Not Go To Iraq
The Muslim fanatics are confused now. Being told to not go where the infidels are. Bin Laden and his guys are seeing their front line troops slaughtered and the supply is not infinite. First act of surrender.
8 posted on
01/22/2004 4:19:16 AM PST by
doosee
To: kattracks
When they start accidentally hitting civilians in these locations what will there strategy be then?
To: kattracks
This is also the problem that JI is having in Indonesia. They're killed too many Muslims (95 percent at JW Marriott), they don't have any clean Western targets, and they're not wanted.
11 posted on
01/22/2004 4:32:26 AM PST by
angkor
May all bin Laden's money take wings
and all his cohorts disband in confusion
before the might of the United States
swoops down to evict him
from his caves.
12 posted on
01/22/2004 4:44:05 AM PST by
GretchenEE
(America will never seek a permission slip to defend our country.)
To: kattracks
...urging al Qaeda supporters to stay out of Baghdad and concentrate on hitting U.S. military targets in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar and Bahrain... Obviously these dumbasses haven't yet concluded that attacking US Military in any location is a losing proposition.
And that's a good thing.
I'm sure the majority of AQ supporters are disappointed that they're not being urged to murder women and children; their preferred targets.
To: kattracks
Flypaper stratergy.
16 posted on
01/22/2004 5:00:23 AM PST by
jimbo123
To: kattracks
But but but W said to bring it on. And now their quiting? Bin must be worried about Kerry. Yeah thats it.
17 posted on
01/22/2004 5:03:20 AM PST by
gbaker
To: kattracks
Guess we're killing them about as fast, if not faster, than whoever is running the show (I still say he's dead) can send them. As Martha Stewart would say: That's A Good Thing.
18 posted on
01/22/2004 5:20:41 AM PST by
Snake65
(Osama Bin Decomposing)
To: kattracks
If it's PR he wants, bin Laden should go back to building roads and hospitals and day care centers and abortion clinics and government cheese distribution centers. Patty Murray will give him all the good PR he wants.
Of course, OBL is dead anyway.
19 posted on
01/22/2004 5:25:57 AM PST by
Tricorn
To: kattracks
Al Queda doesn't care who they kill, just like the psychotics they are.
20 posted on
01/22/2004 5:50:35 AM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: kattracks
New articles in al Qaeda's biweekly Internet magazine...
How bizarre. So, do they have a birthday and anniversary page too? Crossword puzzle? Classified ads?

To: Travis McGee; Squantos; harpseal; Jeff Head; Ernest_at_the_Beach; BOBTHENAILER; TexKat; ...
First of all, "He's dead, Jim!"
Second, Travis Mcgee predicted al Qaeda Islamofacist thugs would be drawn into Iraq like moths to a big candle. Actually he underestimated the incoming thugs to be slaughtered. It has been more like moths flying into huge bonfires.
That is the reason why the surviving so called brain trust of al Qaeda will probably pull back its thugs. Our spec ops and regular warriors are killing them all over Iraq as they come into Iraq or do something stupid in Iraq after they arrive.
Al Qaeda has never worried about killing innocent Arabs, Jews, or Americans.
28 posted on
01/22/2004 7:36:04 AM PST by
Grampa Dave
(GW is driving every rat in America into a deeper insanity, 24/7/365!)
To: kattracks
Meanwhile at Osama Terror Works LLC:
"Hey Akmed! We are running waaaay low on suicide bombers."
"OK. Tell them to get out of Iraq until we can resupply. We are really ticking the people there off anyway."
To: kattracks
but..but..but there are NO ties with al Qaeda in Iraq??? I saw it on the news.
To: kattracks
The squabbling that is currently going on in Iraq is actually a healthy sign in one very important way - it means that the Iraqis are focused on forming a new government, meaning that (1) they now know the Ba'athists aren't going to roll back as they did in '91, (2) they are convinced that the U.S. really is going to leave with Iraqis in charge and (3) non-Iraqi buttinskis have run out of anything substantive to offer. It is the last issue that is causing al-Qaeda to cut its losses - literally.
It was Tom Clancy who made the point in one of his novels that even the most powerful and well-funded terrorist organization would be insane to attempt to confront even a medium-sized state directly - the difference in terms of funding and manpower is simply not even close within several orders of magnitude. And al-Qaeda has done precisely that, only it wasn't a single medium-sized state, it was the Big Dog and a whole lot of its friends.
Frankly, they gain nothing by continuing to destabilize Iraq. They've come to the position of attempting to conduct a guerrilla war as easily-identified foreigners in open terrain and with half-trained amateurs against professionals, a position that has "loser" written all over it, top to bottom. Their core competency is murdering unarmed civilians, and this is no longer the place for it.
To: kattracks
the fanatic legion of "foreign fighters" may no longer be welcome in most quarters of Iraq. I have heard of civilian protests against the foreign fighters even before Saddam was flushed from his hole. Cautiously optimistic!
38 posted on
01/22/2004 9:39:51 AM PST by
e5man_r_u?
(A Man's mission: Build, Protect, Provide)
To: kattracks
You won't see this being said in the mainstream press, unfortunately. The New York Post is a major exception. Most of the media haven't even admitted that al Quaeda is involved in the Iraqi terrror attacks, let alone that they are losing the war.
Ketchup Kerry doesn't have to explain his position on this successful outcome for Bush, because he will never be asked, not by any of the interviewers he is likely to sit down with.
39 posted on
01/22/2004 9:54:07 AM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: kattracks
Bin Laden isn't telling anybody anything. Bin Laden is dead. If he were alive, it wouldn't be necessary to forge video and audio tapes for him.
To: kattracks
Wait a minute. Whoever's running al Qaeda sounds like they think they might have gotten themselves into a Quagmire. Like they were too overconfident of success and don't have enough troops to finish the job in Iraq. Like it's costing them too much with funding being cut and taking too long.
Sounds like they are taking the advice they and their allies in the UN and Democrat party gave to the president and all American patriots : RUN AWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYY!
42 posted on
01/22/2004 1:55:51 PM PST by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
To: kattracks
I've been asking this question since Dec 2001:
Would someone, anyone, take a picture of Osama holding a current edition of the NYT? Please.
5.56mm
46 posted on
01/22/2004 6:16:26 PM PST by
M Kehoe
To: kattracks
"It's clear that the killing of a lot of Muslims in Iraq is something al Qaeda now wants to avoid," Katz said. DOH! Kinda slow on the uptake, weren't they?
47 posted on
01/22/2004 7:00:19 PM PST by
SuziQ
To: kattracks
I just think he saw the outburst after the caucus the other night, and realized that Dean had no chance to be President. It's W for four more.
50 posted on
01/22/2004 9:07:49 PM PST by
lorrainer
(Professional driver. Closed course.)
To: kattracks
CASUALTIES DOWN SHARPLY!!!
The number of troops killed in Iraq, thank God, are too few to notice any statistically significant trends.
BUT... in August, there were over 1000 wounded. October: 433; November: 344; December: 294; January: 146; January (extrapolated for full month): about 225.
Please ping this data
(Source:
http://lunaville.org/warcasualties/Summary.aspx)
52 posted on
01/23/2004 11:28:09 AM PST by
dangus
To: kattracks
OBL finally got his DNC literature.
54 posted on
01/24/2004 1:29:52 AM PST by
BigSkyFreeper
(All Our Base Are Belong To Dubya)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson