[stopem]

As a senior and millions more who are seniors we have one word,
VOTES. You will NOT get our votes if you destroy social security. Thats a promise not a threat!

[steve50]

You will NOT get our votes if you destroy social security. Thats a promise not a threat!

It should have a delayed effect on SS, it'll take a few years to gain eligibility. But in a decade or so the costs should explode.

[RJCogburn]

As a senior and millions more who are seniors we have one word, VOTES.

The greedy geezer vote.

Don't mend it....end it (as presently constituted).

[MosesKnows]

You will NOT get our votes if you destroy social security

Social Security is failed. The Republican political party and the Democrat political party destroyed social security years ago, and we still vote for them.

[North Coast Conservative]

NEOhio,NWPennsylvania,SWNew Jersay ping:

I respect Ron Paul, he is one of the true patriots in Washington looking out for us.

I don't make this stuff up, and either does he, but at times it appears as ridiculous as a sketch off the old Saturday Night Live. This one could be titled: Samurai Immigrant.

Where is it stated in the Constitution that we have the responsibility to pick up the security of the hemispheres retired citizens? I think that is in the same paragraph that establishes the Department of Education.

Is it me, or is this administration going haywire. It seems like they are bent on political suicide, as well as economic.

In God We Trust.....Semper Fi