Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Couple sues Wal-Mart over broken grocery bag
Pittsburg Tribune Review ^ | 1/8/2004 | Rich Cholodofsky

Posted on 01/08/2004 8:28:54 AM PST by RolandBurnam

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:03:18 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

By Rich Cholodofsky TRIBUNE-REVIEW Thursday, January 8, 2004 A Mt. Pleasant Township couple wants Wal-Mart to pay for foot and toe injuries they claim were caused by canned goods and condiments that tumbled from an overfilled plastic grocery bag.

According to a two-count civil lawsuit filed Wednesday in Westmoreland County, Brenda and Ronald Sager contend a plastic bag they brought home from the East Huntingdon Township store last month was deficient and overstuffed.


(Excerpt) Read more at pittsburghlive.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: frivolouslawsuit; tortreform
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: xzins
I'm a firm believer in "Loser Pays" lawsuits... But the lawyers, aka Congress, would never allow it to get there.
41 posted on 01/08/2004 9:06:04 AM PST by HeadOn (It's me, it's me, it's Ernest T. !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: RolandBurnam
These people should be horsewhipped.

A whole bunch'a this country's problems would be solved if horse whippin' came back in vogue!

42 posted on 01/08/2004 9:07:58 AM PST by night reader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HeadOn
I'm a firm believer in "Loser Pays" lawsuits... But the lawyers, aka Congress, would never allow it to get there.

Loser pays and other derivitives have nothing to do with Congress. These are State suits pursuant to State laws.

In Michigan, we have a process wherby your case is evaulated by three lawyers fairly early in the litigation process. They assign a dollar value to the case. If both sides accept the amount ... the case is over. If a perty rejects, however, that party must improve his or her position by 10% at trial or pay the other sides actual attorney fees and costs.

While not exactly "loser pays" it is more like the "unreasonable one pays" In this case, the consortium number would likely be zero. Toss in actual medicals (probably less than ($500.00) and Pain and suffering (another $500.00 bucks and the evaluation recommendation would be about $1,000.00.

43 posted on 01/08/2004 9:21:04 AM PST by CharacterCounts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: HeadOn
"The bag, which contained a 32-ounce jar of Miracle Whip, a 46-ounce bottle of ketchup, three 15-ounce cans of fruit, an 18-ounce bottle of ranch dressing and a 12-ounce bottle of mustard, broke open when the Sagers returned home and started to put away their groceries."

I was curious, so I duplicated the above as close as I could.

I filled a used blue plastic Wal-Mart bag I found laying around with a 32-ounce jar of Hellmann's mayonnaise, a 64-ounce bottle of Heinz ketchup (some gone), one 29-ounce can of peaches and one 15-ounce can of peach halves, a 16-ounce bottle of Newman's Own Caesar dressing and a 19-ounce plastic bottle of Plochman's mustard.

11 pounds. I carried it all over the house, and it never felt like it was about to break.

If they do this with a jury, there is no way they'll go against Wal-Mart.

44 posted on 01/08/2004 9:31:42 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: HeadOn
Also, one other thing I noted. When I was carrying this 11-pound bag by the handles, it's only about 8 - 10 inches above the ground. Probably would be less if a shorter person is carrying it.

Now, if the bag broke when she lifted it to the counter at home, well, that's one thing. But since the damage was limited to her right foot (and we can assume she was right-handed), I think it broke when she was carrying it. (Otherwise, they would have fallen everywhere.)

Ligament damage and broken bones from an 8 inch drop? Fishy.

45 posted on 01/08/2004 9:47:47 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: RolandBurnam
Wal-Mart always underpacks their bags, leaving me with far to many bags to try to grab onto.
46 posted on 01/08/2004 9:49:11 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4everontheRight
He's blaming Wal-Mart for not getting any nooky????? Dang! My husband usually just blames the alcohol!!

Loss of consortium is in itself a legitimate legal claim and often added to injury suits (which in themselves are often baseless).

47 posted on 01/08/2004 9:49:54 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
Pracitce safe food nooky. Use condiments. ;)

I can't, I'm Catholic. We aren't allowed to use condiments.

:-)))))

48 posted on 01/08/2004 9:50:57 AM PST by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
I have a beef with Target. They seem reluctant to part with any of their super-large bags. You buy something big and they always say, here's a sticker for that, you don't need a bad, do you? And I always answer, Why yes, I do want a bag, thank you.
49 posted on 01/08/2004 9:53:10 AM PST by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RolandBurnam
Bagging groceries is a lost art!

..there was no such thing as plastic bags when I was a sacker in high-school.

50 posted on 01/08/2004 9:54:33 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RolandBurnam
Perfect case for Tort Reform.
51 posted on 01/08/2004 9:55:36 AM PST by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RolandBurnam
I don't think anyone should look up attorney John Scales or plaintiffs Brenda and Ronald Sager in the Pittsburgh area phone book and give them a piece of their mind. Nope. Don't do it.
52 posted on 01/08/2004 9:57:34 AM PST by manic4organic (An organic conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RolandBurnam
We really, really need tort reform. With "looser pays" as the centerpiece.
53 posted on 01/08/2004 10:24:45 AM PST by upchuck (This tag line will self-destruct in five seconds. 5.... 4.... 3.... 2.... 1.... DISOLVE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
For a banged-up foot? Mebbe he's one'a them fetishists. :)

Certainly he's not a good Baptist.

Q: Why don't Baptists make love standing up?
A: It might lead to dancing.

54 posted on 01/08/2004 10:43:37 AM PST by Norman Conquest (There ain't no such thing as a free lunch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte
" For consortium, use of her foot is not strictly needed."

Perhaps that has nothing to do with the foot, but rather he needed the bag to put over her head.
55 posted on 01/08/2004 10:46:59 AM PST by Grig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Grig
Very good point you make! We have no idea as to the ultimate disposition of the bag. Perhaps it wasn't capable of providing full coverage.
56 posted on 01/08/2004 10:59:02 AM PST by Xenalyte (I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
Bagging groceries is a lost art!

Amen. It's like Tetris real-time!

57 posted on 01/08/2004 11:01:53 AM PST by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Cool! I love a good experiment. Thanks !

As for the "lifting it to the counter" aspect, there may be something to that. There is a big difference between holding (steady state) stress, and moving (acceleration) stress.

I once had a physics professor who absolutely ruined some lawyer's big payday by proving in court that jerking the chain on a chain hoist instead of steadily pulling (as the manual strongly cautioned) multiplied stresses several times.
58 posted on 01/08/2004 11:03:14 AM PST by HeadOn (It's me, it's me, it's Ernest T. !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD
I agree with you completely.

I don't think this is worth a lawsuit, well maybe so if she really did break her foot, but those bags will sometimes drop the contents with almost no warning and not much weight.

59 posted on 01/08/2004 11:10:35 AM PST by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RolandBurnam
Brenda Sager suffered numerous injuries including cracked and damaged toenails. .... ....as a result of his wife's injuries he has been deprived of her attention and comfort and suffered a loss of consortium.

Not tonight dear, I have a broken toenail.

60 posted on 01/08/2004 12:01:20 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (Fighting for Freedom and Having Fun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson