Skip to comments.
Random Thoughts On The Decline Of English
Fred On Everything ^
| 010504
| Fred Reed
Posted on 01/06/2004 7:25:39 PM PST by Archangelsk
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Indeed.
To: Criminal Number 18F
Ping
To: All
Rank |
Location |
Receipts |
Donors/Avg |
Freepers/Avg |
Monthlies |
|
Kenya |
|
|
|
|
|
20.00
|
1
|
Thanks for donating to Free Republic!
Move your locale up the leaderboard!
3
posted on
01/06/2004 7:27:53 PM PST
by
Support Free Republic
(If Woody had gone straight to the police, this would never have happened!)
To: Archangelsk
"What we have lost we will be a long while in getting back."
Wrong. What we have lost will never be found. How sad.
4
posted on
01/06/2004 7:29:40 PM PST
by
baltodog
To: Archangelsk
Apparently I'm not alone. Good.
To: Archangelsk
Malicious guttersnipes.
To: Archangelsk
He be makin' ebonics seem double-plus-ungood.
7
posted on
01/06/2004 7:35:14 PM PST
by
Diogenesis
(If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
To: Archangelsk
Well, Fred, these days it all depends on what the meaning of is is.
8
posted on
01/06/2004 7:37:47 PM PST
by
jigsaw
(God Bless Our Troops.)
To: Archangelsk
But how in Ebonics does one say, The entropy of a closed system tends to remain the same or to increase?Ebonics:
The entropy o' uh closed system tends ta remain da same or ta increase what 'chew trippin foo'
Jive:
Da entropy o' some closed system tends t' remain da same o' t'incraise.
9
posted on
01/06/2004 7:39:07 PM PST
by
Consort
To: Archangelsk
I cannot agree more. Where is Gwendolyn Ritchie (Columbus HS, English, circa 1963) when we really need her? The art and practice of the language are fading away before our very eyes. How will the generations yet born be able to communicate in some meaningful way?
Faint hope remains, however, on this forum. I recently misused the word "misogyny" when I meant to use "miscengenation". The lateness of the hour, the effects of copious amounts of Jack Daniels, and my reliance on Microsoft's Spellchecker were my only excuses -- they were flimsy defense. But, I was quickly and firmly set straight by fellow freepers. Light the torch and hold it high. Welcome those who choose to come close to the light, and share the knowledge. We shall prevail.
To: msdrby
ping
11
posted on
01/06/2004 7:53:31 PM PST
by
Professional Engineer
(When the going gets tough, The tough fix bayonets)
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
To: Archangelsk
"Indeed." Yea, verily, and forsooth!!!
To: Archangelsk
The author omitted the their, there, and they're confusion. That misuse drives me abso-freaking-lutely nuts.
14
posted on
01/06/2004 8:04:39 PM PST
by
Ophiucus
To: Consort
But how in Ebonics does one say, The entropy of a closed system tends to remain the same or to increase? Tings stays the same. O' dey gets worser.
15
posted on
01/06/2004 8:05:02 PM PST
by
freedumb2003
(Okay, who stole their tin foil hats? I demand they return them!)
To: Archangelsk
I dunno, I think ol' Fred's kinda good with them thar words an' all that kinda stuff.
16
posted on
01/06/2004 8:05:53 PM PST
by
BeerSwillr
(Profanity free since 2003-12-17 20:41:45)
To: Archangelsk
Beautiful essay, rather better than Fred has been wont to produce of late. Good writing requires a decent vocabulary, built slowly by reading the works of better writers, which is one reason Fred might ask "Are there real writers out there under fifty?" Of course there are, but they are rather rare. They seem to occur most often in poetry - Shelley and Rimbaud come to mind as examples of very young poets who displayed an artistry with language that they developed with astonishing rapidity in their tragically short span of years.
But essayists, now they're another matter. Montaigne, the master and progenitor of them all, did not flower until quite late in life. This, I think, may be a consequence of the clarity of thought born of long practice and the fund of life's experience that the really good essayist brings to bear on his subject, which are the fruits of maturity.
But I don't think the appreciation of writing as a high art has diminished any more than the appreciation of painting or sculpture; it was, as Fred suggests, always the characteristic of a self-selecting elite rather than a self-proclaimed and undeserving one (that, parenthetically, has given the odor to the term "elite" that it currently quite rightfully carries), and it is a taste that must be cultivated. It may be that an age of instant gratification such as the television offers tends to obscure the existence of the more patient appreciations, but kill them off altogether? Never! Why else would anyone write this sort of composition? Why would anyone think it worth offering to an audience of readers, and why would anyone think it worthy of comment?
I don't always - well, often - agree with Mr. Reed, but he can certainly craft a well-turned phrase. Thanks for posting!
To: Archangelsk
As an English major, reading the above makes me sad. Fred is saying what I have thought for years.
To: Archangelsk
What a sad and wonderful article.
And there is NO such word as " ANYWAYS "; it does NOT exist, no mater how many times FREEPERs type it. :-(
To: nopardons
What REALLY drives me nuts is all the commentators on TV saying "Take a listen...". It sounds so stupid to me.
And why does EVERYONE say "Where are you AT?" Good grief!
20
posted on
01/06/2004 8:19:18 PM PST
by
bonfire
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson