Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Charges put Rush in select group: 2
New York Daily News ^ | 1/04/04 | News Wire Sdervices

Posted on 01/04/2004 2:26:31 AM PST by kattracks

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. - Rush Limbaugh was wrong when he accused prosecutors of singling him out, but not by much. Palm Beach County prosecutors investigating the right-wing radio host for his prescription drug abuse have filed "doctor shopping" charges against one other person in the past five years, according to records.

Limbaugh's lawyer said the court documents, reviewed by The Palm Beach Post yesterday, prove his client was unfairly targeted.

"Rush Limbaugh has been singled out for special prosecution because of who he is," Roy Black told the paper. "We believe the state attorney's office is applying a double standard."

State Attorney Barry Krischer denied the accusation, saying, "Whether Mr. Limbaugh is subject to prosecution for any crimes is still under investigation."

Investigators seized Limbaugh's medical records in November after discovering he got more than 2,000 painkillers, prescribed by four doctors, at a pharmacy near his home. Limbaugh's former maid told investigators she supplied him with prescription painkillers for years.

Limbaugh's lawyers had argued the seizure of his records violated his privacy and that the probe was politically motivated.

The commentator, once a harsh critic of drug abusers, recently admitted his addiction, saying it stemmed from severe back pain. He took a five-week leave from his radio show to enter a detox program.

The Palm Beach Post review found only one case in which the county filed charges of illegally acquiring overlapping prescriptions, but the defendant died before trial.

Doctor shopping, a crime that can bring up to five years in prison, is conning more than one physician to write the same prescriptions within 30 days.

Originally published on January 4, 2004



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: da; dirtypolitics; districtattorney; doublespeak; drugs; fishingexpedition; florida; floriduh; gonefishing; gossip; harassment; libel; libertinarians; limbaugh; mediabias; medicalrecords; misconduct; partisanda; partisanpolitics; pilingon; privacy; propaganda; prosecutorial; revisionisthistory; rush; rushbashing; rushlimbaugh; smearcampaign; talkradio; witchhunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101 next last

1 posted on 01/04/2004 2:26:31 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
". . . have filed "doctor shopping" charges against one other person in the past five years . . ."

This phrase is bordering on libel. It implies that charges HAVE been filed against Rush Limbaugh. That has not happened.

To properly report this, the phrase should read ". . . have filed "doctor shopping" charges against just one other person in the past five years . . .

2 posted on 01/04/2004 2:37:02 AM PST by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Rank Location Receipts Donors/Avg Freepers/Avg Monthlies
United Kingdom




30.00
1

Thanks for donating to Free Republic!

Move your locale up the leaderboard!

3 posted on 01/04/2004 2:37:10 AM PST by Support Free Republic (Freepers post from sun to sun, but a fundraiser bot's work is never done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1051144/posts
AP Kills Limbaugh Painkillers Story (QUICK BEFORE IT CHANGES)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A52369-2004Jan3.html ^ | January 3, 2003w
Make certain the story is not used.
AP Kills Limbaugh Painkillers Story (AP, Jan. 3, 2004; 5:06 PM)
Snagged this from the Urinal & Constipation:
I've posted a .PDF of this here, for posterity.
Yikes, this has been sitting on the wires for 8 hours before it got caught.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/rushsearch1.html
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/rushsearch3.html
What I don't get, folks, is the bottom line here. Yes, the "killed" article states incorrectly that Rush was charged with doctor shopping, but other than that, it actually SUPPORTS Rush's contention that the prosecution is unusual. Could there perhaps be ANOTHER reason for the kill order?
The first sentence in the Palm Beach Post's version is completely different.

4 posted on 01/04/2004 2:39:47 AM PST by backhoe (--30--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
You are right. Here is the text from your Washington Post link:


AP Kills Limbaugh Painkillers Story

The Associated Press
Saturday, January 3, 2004; 5:06 PM


WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. - Please kill the story Limbaugh-Painkillers, V9991. Rush Limbaugh has not been charged with doctor shopping.

A kill is mandatory.

Make certain the story is not used.


SOMEONE seems to have an agenda spreading false news about the unelected radio host, Mr. Limbaugh. 1984 in action, folks. Didn't happen, kill the story.
5 posted on 01/04/2004 3:00:50 AM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: weegee
SOMEONE seems to have an agenda spreading false news about the unelected radio host, Mr. Limbaugh. 1984 in action, folks. Didn't happen, kill the story.

I have thought from the beginning that it was a Witch-Hunt, pure and simple.

6 posted on 01/04/2004 3:07:59 AM PST by backhoe (--30--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
". . . have filed "doctor shopping" charges against one other person in the past five years . . ."

This phrase is bordering on libel. It implies that charges HAVE been filed against Rush Limbaugh. That has not happened.

To properly report this, the phrase should read ". . . have filed "doctor shopping" charges against just one other person in the past five years .

Brilliant, Swordmaker, absolutely brilliant!

7 posted on 01/04/2004 3:31:32 AM PST by YaYa123 (@Thank You.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Now, who do you suppose that SOMEONE might be?

Hmmmm??
8 posted on 01/04/2004 3:53:02 AM PST by wunderkind54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
I have thought from the beginning that it was a Witch-Hunt, pure and simple.

...and we know, who the witch is....Sen. Mrs. William Jefferson Blight (Shrillary) Clinton ('RAT-NY)

9 posted on 01/04/2004 4:10:51 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wunderkind54
who do you suppose...

Let's take a wild, wild guess--




Seems someone gave this hat to her as a gag gift in '93, and she posed with it. Wonder why we didn't find this gem sooner...

Thanks to Bon mots-

10 posted on 01/04/2004 4:15:51 AM PST by backhoe (--30--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
State Attorney Barry Krischer denied the accusation, saying, "Whether Mr. Limbaugh is subject to prosecution for any crimes is still under investigation."

Let's see..here. Now, they apparently don't have a strong enough case to bring criminal charges against Limbaugh, yet the "charges" they are considering indicting him on are already public???

Wouldn't that be a nice tool to intimidate your political enemies with, IF you were a politically minded prosecutor. Just release to the press "off the record" things like: "We're looking at Mr. Smith in the area of wife beating..", or "... record were seized at a children's day care related to the Mr. Smith investigation, though nothing is conclusive...", or "..confidential informants link Mr. Smith to a drug trafficing ring, and we're investigating.." Then just let the "non-charges" fester for a couple of years.

This is the definition of "prosecutorial misconduct" everywhere except, I suppose, Florida. If the DA's office had no charges to file, then there should be nothing in the press about Limbaugh. As far as seizing his medical records, usually there has to be "probably cause" to get a search warrant. The fact that he overmedicated himself is not necessarily probably cause of anything. I wonder what evidence they had .. HARD evidence, that Limbaugh evaded the law to get his drugs.

SFS

11 posted on 01/04/2004 4:21:39 AM PST by Steel and Fire and Stone (SFS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steel and Fire and Stone
"probably cause" == probable cause
12 posted on 01/04/2004 4:23:14 AM PST by Steel and Fire and Stone (SFS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass
Link:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1050050/posts?page=126#126
13 posted on 01/04/2004 4:23:33 AM PST by backhoe (--30--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
This gag gift fits her like a glove.
14 posted on 01/04/2004 4:35:04 AM PST by wunderkind54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln; Ben Hecks; dix; tubebender; Don Carlos; oprahstheantichrist; nutmeg; cyborg; ...
      Rush Ping!

Freepmail me if you would like on/off the Rush Pinglist!

Search for the latest Rush Limbaugh news on Free Republic.

Limbaugh Prosecutor a Janet Reno Democrat

Lawyers accuse maid of blackmail.

Limbaugh takes off the gloves!

Limbaugh medical records ordered resealed!

ACLU Offers Help to Limbaugh

AP kills Limbaugh story. Breaking Now.

Kendall Coffey Comments on the Rush Limbaugh Case

Rush Limbaugh.com
 

15 posted on 01/04/2004 5:34:52 AM PST by ConservativeMan55 (You know how those liberals are. Two's Company but three is a fundraiser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
Bumping in support of Rush!!!!!!
16 posted on 01/04/2004 5:38:59 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
I don't always thank you for the pings, CM55. But, they are appreciated!

Lando

17 posted on 01/04/2004 5:42:40 AM PST by Lando Lincoln (The Vermin had vermin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Steel and Fire and Stone
Just release to the press "off the record" things like: "We're looking at Mr. Smith in the area of wife beating..", or "... record were seized at a children's day care related to the Mr. Smith investigation, though nothing is conclusive...", or "..confidential informants link Mr. Smith to a drug trafficing ring, and we're investigating.."

"We have not yet gathered enough evidence to charge Governor Dean with child molestation"... "We can neither confirm nor deny that Wesley Clark has been identified as the Olympic park bomber. If and when charges are filed, General Clark will have a chance to defend himself in court."

18 posted on 01/04/2004 5:43:04 AM PST by Sloth ("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, 'Zoolander')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
No Problem. I enjoy it! Do you like my new ping banner?
19 posted on 01/04/2004 5:43:42 AM PST by ConservativeMan55 (You know how those liberals are. Two's Company but three is a fundraiser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I said from day one that Rush would weather this, and make his enemies chew nails. The worm appears to be turning even in the press. Truth will out! :)
20 posted on 01/04/2004 5:46:29 AM PST by veronica (Monterey County Film Commission Screenwriting Contest /ATTN:FR writers/FReepmail me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
Like it?! It's a masterpiece! Leaves my html skills sorely wanting!

Lando

21 posted on 01/04/2004 5:53:36 AM PST by Lando Lincoln (The Vermin had vermin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
LOL!
22 posted on 01/04/2004 5:58:53 AM PST by ConservativeMan55 (You know how those liberals are. Two's Company but three is a fundraiser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: veronica
I've been a Rush Limbaugh listener since day one: Rush's hypocracy on the War on Some Drugs makes it difficult if not impossible to listen anymore. For all the Freepers and others who are blindly supporting him on this all I can ask is where have you been with your technicalities and conspiracy theories for the millions and millions of American citizens who were arrested, imprisoned and laid to ruin for simple marijuana possession during Rush's tenure? Certainly you don't beleive that very dangerous & addictive "prescription" drugs like Oxy and the other crap he was ingesting at record rates are worse than marijuana?

Where were you -- writing your representatives, speaking out, voting for drug policy reform candidates -- for these people? All of a sudden: Rush is a victim. Rush is a victim of his own greed and addiction: hard to feel sorry for him let alone believe him anymore.
23 posted on 01/04/2004 5:59:36 AM PST by Nick Thimmesch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Nick Thimmesch
I don't recall Rush talking about drugs very often. And I don't think people should be jailed for having small amounts of weed either. I don't "feel sorry" for Rush and I don't he's a victim, and he does not think of himself as a victim. He's admitted he did something wrong, he has sought treatment, and he just does not want to be singled out for malicious prosecution because he's a Conservative icon. I support him 100% and I always will.
24 posted on 01/04/2004 6:08:54 AM PST by veronica (Monterey County Film Commission Screenwriting Contest /ATTN:FR writers/FReepmail me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Nick Thimmesch
Rush's hypocracy on the War on Some Drugs

"There you go again" ... you can't cite ONE diatribe where Rush 'went off on drugs'. As a matter of fact, Rush stated he avoided such discussions, and you can't point to any.

Now, hang it up on this point ...

25 posted on 01/04/2004 6:08:59 AM PST by _Jim ( <--- Ann Coulter speaks on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
I'm convinced they just pull th.is crap out of the air.
26 posted on 01/04/2004 6:21:25 AM PST by ConservativeMan55 (You know how those liberals are. Two's Company but three is a fundraiser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
I'm convinced they just pull th.is crap out of the air.

Truly - a classic example of listening, but not hearing and then 'coloring' any recollections with what their 'perceptive memories' dictate ...

27 posted on 01/04/2004 6:26:07 AM PST by _Jim ( <--- Ann Coulter speaks on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
Exactly. Its like they know what the truth is, but deny it exists.
28 posted on 01/04/2004 6:28:51 AM PST by ConservativeMan55 (You know how those liberals are. Two's Company but three is a fundraiser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
I had one character here on FR claim that the oft-used and done in humor phrase "long-haired, maggot-infested, dope-smoking FM types" was an indictment of dope smokers, and, to top it off this character couldn't even get the phrase right!

That phrase, BTW, when used by Rush is a humorous indictment of the liberals who inhabit the FM dial more than it was EVER intended to indict or torment the lowly 'dope smoker' ...

29 posted on 01/04/2004 6:35:44 AM PST by _Jim ( <--- Ann Coulter speaks on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
LOL...did you point out to them that if Rush is indicted....EVERYONE any ANYONE who has ever admitted to using drugs will have to be prosecuted.

This includes Brett Favre, Ozzy Osbourne, Jack Osbourne, and just about every other celebrity known to man.
30 posted on 01/04/2004 6:40:42 AM PST by ConservativeMan55 (You know how those liberals are. Two's Company but three is a fundraiser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: veronica
I don't recall Rush talking about drugs very often. And I don't think people should be jailed for having small amounts of weed either. I don't "feel sorry" for Rush and I don't think he's a victim, and he does not think of himself as a victim. He's admitted he did something wrong, he has sought treatment, and he just does not want to be singled out for malicious prosecution because he's a Conservative icon. I support him 100% and I always will.

Not only do I agree with your every word, I, too, can't recall Rush saying much about drugs, besides an occasional quip.

31 posted on 01/04/2004 6:59:59 AM PST by backhoe (Just an old Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the TrackBall into the Sunset...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
In fact...they had to go back to 1995 to even find a quote where Rush mentioned drugs. 9 years! LOL!
32 posted on 01/04/2004 7:02:34 AM PST by ConservativeMan55 (You know how those liberals are. Two's Company but three is a fundraiser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
In fact...they had to go back to 1995...

Exactly.

I keep Rush on in the background while I do other things- and darned if I could recall much besides that "maggot-infested" crack that sounded like satire or parody, to me, at least.

BTW, I pulled the source code for your Rush list and am studying it to see if I can plagiarize the idea for a picture & links banner about other subjects I cover.

33 posted on 01/04/2004 7:10:57 AM PST by backhoe (Just an old Cold Warrior, draggin' his BAR into the Sunset...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55; backhoe
In fact...they had to go back to 1995 to even find a quote where Rush mentioned drugs. 9 years! LOL!

And that was not in the context of "going after druggies", but simply a discussion of . . . drum roll . . . selective prosecution (in that case, black vs. white IIRC).

34 posted on 01/04/2004 7:11:04 AM PST by AnAmericanMother (. . . sed, ut scis, quis homines huiusmodi intellegere potest?. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

To: ConservativeMan55
Rush Is The Man!
36 posted on 01/04/2004 8:49:07 AM PST by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JackRyanCIA
If this thing drags on, are there any plans afoot among South Florida Freepers to give this Krischer clown a little taste of Freeping? Seems to me it might help educate this guy about the folly of unleashing political witch hunts.
37 posted on 01/04/2004 8:56:32 AM PST by speedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
From the RL TV show 10/5/95:

"What this says to me is that too many whites are getting away with drug use. Too many whites are getting away with drug sales. Too many whites are getting away with trafficking in this stuff. The answer to this disparity is not to start letting people out of jail because we're not putting others in jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out and find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too."

More quotes can be found here:

http://www.fair.org/extra/0311/limbaugh-drugs.html

38 posted on 01/04/2004 9:12:15 AM PST by Nanodik (Libertarian, Ex-Canadian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: blackie
Rush Is The Man!

Yeah, if you are looking to score some hillbilly heroine.

39 posted on 01/04/2004 9:14:18 AM PST by Nanodik (Libertarian, Ex-Canadian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Nanodik
The answer to this disparity is not to start letting people out of jail because we're not putting others in jail who are breaking the law.

You *do* understand/you did understand just WHAT was being conveyed here - don't you?

The libs at the time were moving forward with the idea that people should be let OUT of jail AS OPPOSED TO putting those into jail who broke the law.

I think, but am not certain at this point, that THIS also predates the point in time where Rush began have spine/back trouble (WHICH precipitated the treatment pain with pain-killing medication presciption issued by the medical profession).

Now, was that all you had?

40 posted on 01/04/2004 9:24:26 AM PST by _Jim ( <--- Ann Coulter speaks on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
Intruder (an apparent "hypocritical Libertarian") alert - posts #38 and 39.

This guy must be really conflicted: a Libertarian ostensibly 'bashing' a conservative icon for alleged misue of a legally prescribable (as opposed to illegal, non-prescibable substances like marijuana, cocaine and heroine) 'pain killer' ...

41 posted on 01/04/2004 9:31:56 AM PST by _Jim ( <--- Ann Coulter speaks on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Nick Thimmesch
If you took the time to notice Rush stoped talking about druges before he started taking them for his pain.Might I guess that your have had some experence with the ole mary jane? If I am wrong please forgive.
42 posted on 01/04/2004 9:40:24 AM PST by MamaK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
I have heard people who called up on the RL show and talk about legalizing pot especially when it came to tobacco legislation. RL's comment was that pot smokers are just selfish and that there is nothing wrong with tobacco because it's legal. His argument was completely circular. My drug is good because it's legal and yours is bad because it's illegal. Those who want to make my drug illegal are idiots and busybodies. And BTW you are selfish for wanting your drug to be legal.
43 posted on 01/04/2004 9:43:16 AM PST by Nanodik (Libertarian, Ex-Canadian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The Palm Beach Post review found only one case in which the county filed charges of illegally acquiring overlapping prescriptions, but the defendant died before trial.

This article edits out something critical the Palm Beach Post told in an earlier article. This person was prosecuted to try and intimidate him into testifying against his wife's doctor, so it was a not a prosecution for doctor shopping, but a prosecution to try and intimidate and harrass the guy into helping the prosecutors. See Charge in Limbaugh Drug Case Rarely Used paragraph 20.

44 posted on 01/04/2004 9:44:45 AM PST by justanotherfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass
I would like to know how this hag gets away with smearing everyone else, including people that supposedly are for her. I understand that she has been tossed out of the that lawsuit of Gennifer Flowers in Vegas. Of course, her two supposed buddies, James and George, remain in the lawsuit.

I suspect this is the plan that worked for Bubba. It seems that he was always able to get out of the slime pit too. I see it all happening again with the hag.

I wonder when one of their supposed supporters is going to get sick of being thrown to the lions and hang them?

It's about time to throw these two in jail
45 posted on 01/04/2004 10:04:05 AM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Ditto that. I rarely heard Rush talk about drugs and usually he would bring up the topic only to illustrate some inconsistency, such as in the drugs laws.
46 posted on 01/04/2004 10:13:52 AM PST by tertiary01 (Life's precious. We can always be dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
I do believe the Clintons are able to get away with their cheap trash because of our type of society today. I also believe they are always trying to scam the public into believing how powerful they are.

What makes this so pitiful is how sick they really are.
47 posted on 01/04/2004 10:21:42 AM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
I think there are trolls who just have it in for Rush no matter what. These are the ones who have always listened because they hate Rush not because they argree. There is nothing that will satisfy them short of a public flogging they can personally administer.

It should also be pointed out that the doctor shopping charges was a "make charge" which was part of a failed immunity deal. The defendant failed to "substantially assist" with their testimony in a murder case. It was only then that a charge was issued for doctor shopping. (out of all the other possible charges)

Despite the naysayers, Rush is going to have one heck of a bar complaint (SA have higher standards) and one heck of a civil claim agains all involved.
48 posted on 01/04/2004 11:16:41 AM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Cool! If you need any help with it, then let me know.
49 posted on 01/04/2004 11:25:07 AM PST by ConservativeMan55 (You know how those liberals are. Two's Company but three is a fundraiser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Steel and Fire and Stone
"I wonder what evidence they had .. "



This might bring you up to speed -

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/rushsearch1.html

It may not be up to your personal standards, but so far TWO judges have seen it as probable cause.
50 posted on 01/04/2004 11:58:36 AM PST by RS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson