Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats have built a soft-money lifeboat [Federal campaign finance law violations?]
The Hill ^ | 12/3/03 | Dick Morris

Posted on 12/03/2003 5:58:41 AM PST by TastyManatees

Democrats have built a soft-money lifeboat

After battling with all their might for the soft-money ban that is included in the McCain-Feingold bill, the Democrats, led by Bill and Hillary Clinton, are subverting the purpose of the legislation, consigning it to the dustbin of campaign-finance reforms.

After McCain-Feingold passed, a funny thing happened. The Democrats discovered they weren’t as good as Republicans are at raising hard money. At $2,000 per person, they could only come up with $66.5 million through the end of September of this year. In the same period, the Republicans raised $158 million.

So the Democratic Party, led by Clinton operative Harold Ickes, has catalyzed the formation of Americans Coming Together (ACT), an independent-expenditure organizations that hopes to raise and spend $94 million defeating Bush in 2004. To get it going, billionaire financier George Soros and Peter B. Lewis, chairman of Progressive Corp., each donated $10 million to the kitty.

Democrats dressed up their pursuit of soft money in previous elections as a necessary device to match Republican fundraising. Even as McCain-Feingold was passing, both parties raced to rake in all the soft contributions they could before the president signed the bill banning them.

But this current effort is not preceded by any Republican provocation. The GOP has not established the soft-money answer to ACT (although it now inevitably will do so). This evasion of the campaign-finance law is a unilateral act by the same political party that led the fight against soft money.

Just as Clinton’s use of soft money in 1996 to pay for his early campaign advertisements (rejecting my advice to turn down federal financing and its limits on hard-money spending) was the death knell of the post-Watergate reforms, so ACT dooms the newly enacted McCain-Feingold.

It’s bad enough that the new legislation allows legitimate independent groups such as the AFL-CIO on the left or the American Medical Association on the right to spend whatever they want in soft money to influence elections. But to create a phony group just for the purpose of taking soft money for campaign advertisements, amounts to a deliberate scuttling of the new reforms.

The independent-expenditure effort amounts to more than just an attempt to continue to live off the soft money the Democrats had battled to ban. It is a virtual abandonment of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) as the central vehicle for the party’s campaign next year. Rather than stick with the hard-money-hobbled DNC, with all its limitations, reporting requirements and donation limits, Ickes and Co. are counting on ACT to free them from those bounds.

In effect, they have created an off-the-shelf, unregulated, uncontrolled, soft-money vehicle to run the campaign in 2004. Without the reporting obligations that the DNC has, the independent-expenditure organization can fund anything it wants — overt or covert — to advance the party agenda in 2004.

Soros’s and Lewis’s donations represent the most aggressive attempt by one or two men to take over the political system with their money since Steven Forbes tried it in 1996 and H. Ross Perot in 1992. But those two efforts at least had the saving grace of ego behind them. They were efforts by individuals to use their own wealth to achieve their political ambitions. The Soros and Lewis efforts are designed to use extraordinary wealth to control the outcome of democratic elections.

Where Ickes is, Bill and Hillary are never far behind. Harold would never have launched this effort without the backing, support, encouragement and perhaps the suggestion of the Clintons. With Howard Dean about to take over the Democratic Party machinery, the Clintons need an alternative vehicle to exercise control over the apparatus. They need a slush fund to channel money to favored candidates and to pick up the tab for their expenses.

DNC Chairman Terry McAuliffe, while always willing, is limited in what he can raise in hard money, so Ickes was sent off to build a soft-money escape vehicle into which they could all pile if Dean’s barbarians at the gate burst in.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dick Morris is the author of Off With Their Heads: Traitors, Crooks, and Obstructionists in American Politics, Media, and Business.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: americans; campaign; campaignfinance; cfr; coming; democrat; election; hard; mccainfeingold; money; moveon; president; soft; soros; together
A lot of people are catching on with the new Democrat strategy to launder contributions to major ad campaigns through third parties like MoveOn.org and call them "soft money". Most of these groups aren't even trying to make it sound like the contributions aren't being used in election campaigns. Groups like MoveOn solicit "soft money" contributions with the explicitly stated purpose of using them for campaign ads opposing the re-election of President Bush.

Tasty Manatees
1 posted on 12/03/2003 5:58:42 AM PST by TastyManatees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TastyManatees
Interesting that Republican candidates get more small contributions that add up to better financed campaigns.
2 posted on 12/03/2003 6:03:55 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TastyManatees
Don't cha know, for Democrats, laws are for other people. After all, they are saving America from the evil Republicans so they are allowed to break the laws...
3 posted on 12/03/2003 6:06:59 AM PST by 2banana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TastyManatees
but ... but... John McCain promise dus this legislation would take the money out of politics. What a maroon. Until you take the money out of GOVERNMENT you will always have money in politics.
4 posted on 12/03/2003 7:52:22 AM PST by almcbean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TastyManatees
INTREP - DemoRATS - "do-anything-to-regain-power" ALERT!
5 posted on 12/03/2003 8:24:54 AM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TastyManatees
It kinda makes sense now, that the Black Congressional Caucus, who was against McCain-Feingold, all of a sudden shut up about it.
6 posted on 12/03/2003 9:21:24 AM PST by stylin19a (is it vietnam yet ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson