The Perverted State Of America

Toogood Reports ^ | 11/25/03 | Allan C. Stover

[weegee]

Calling me a twit and "son" are personal insults. I kept to the discussion at hand. This is a warning.

Meanwhile, would you care to address the rest of the editorial that you dismissed at the second sentence? You sure did your job of derailing this thread by posting so many times while actually avoiding any discussion of the lead article.

[WhatNot]

bump

[EdReform]

The Importance of Morality and Religion in Government

Conservativism and Morality (Cathryn Crawford)

[scripter]

Bump and ping. I thought the article was well written. Thanks for posting it.

Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1), (Version 1.0)

Homosexual Agenda Index (bump list)

Homosexual Agenda Keyword Search

All FreeRepublic Bump Lists

Would you like to be part of the solution? To stay informed of the issues? A simple freepmail is all it takes to join the homosexual agenda ping list, and you can cancel at anytime.

[scripter]

You've probably read that the newly ordained homosexual Episcopal bishop is named simply Gene Robinson, or perhaps even V. Gene Robinson, one of those people who use an initial followed by a middle name. Few media sources mentioned that his first name is Vicky. That's right, Vicky, a name Baby Names website identifies as exclusively for females, sometimes short for Victoria. Why did they hide that fact? The media are rabidly pro-perversion and didn't want to feminize the homosexual bishop in any way.

That little known fact is something I don't remember reading before.

[Eala]

Tangential relevance ping. (First day in almost two weeks I've had the "leisure" to scroll past the first page of postings...)

[little jeremiah]

Okay, they didn't endorse it. They gave it special protection under the law. The act(s) of sodomy which for many long years was illegal in the US, now is a legally protected act. As decided by five buffoons, for the rest of us.

[little jeremiah]

I've read it several times on articles here (that his first name is Vicky). I'll try to dredge my memory. But I've read several references in that regard.

Memory kicks in! In the Federalist (www.federalist.com) - they send out an e-newsletter a couple times a week. Very good reading.

[viaveritasvita]

Testing new software. Sending this post to myself to see if it shows up in my comments (according to my reading of JohnRob's thread about FR changes, it won't show).

<><

[viaveritasvita]

Sorry-to-clog-up-vladog's-mycomments-section-but-read-later bump.

<><

[Kevin Curry]

Do you have an argument? Or do you just like to pitch pious sounding crap in support of the gay agenda because it's easier than thinking?

Grow up, boy.

[winker]

The perversion so rampant in America stemms from our Failure of Our Church Leaders to stand up for Jehovah Gira. For fear of offending "Fat Cats" in the Brotherhood they leave the vast majority of this Country totally un-churched. Where are the Billy Grahams, Falwells and the Robertsons? Even James Robison has gone soft; he used to be a firebrand and totally fearless for Jesus Christ now he promotes vitamin supplements and a watered down Gospel like all the others who remain silent. These are the very ones we need to forcefully attack the liberals and Preach A Lot Of Jesus to our leaders but they remain strangely silent. We are forced to fight a rear guard action to demand a change that should be coming from on High!

[vladog]

OK, I didn't post a comment when I posted the article. Here is the way I feel about. Any sort of homosexual act is wrong and no law or rule from any court can make it right.

Now before someone thinks I'm a frothing at the mouth religious type, I'm not even a Christian or a member of any organized religion. I just know that the perversion that they call homosexual love is wrong and so do the people who are in these relationships, no matter how much they lie about it.

[Protagoras]

This is a warning.

LOL,,you are demented.

[Protagoras]

I made a point which none of you taliban homophobes can deny. But some twits like you and the other flame war attemptee forgot it in your obsessive delusions.

I said the court never endorsed sodomy.

I don't support the gay agenda, homosexuality is wrong. And so are you and the taliban youth. Grow up boy.

[Protagoras]

Okay, they didn't endorse it.

Bingo!!! Go to the head of the class! Of course it's not much of a class, but still, YOU got it!

BTW, they didn't give it special protection, they said it was none of your business or the governments either, and in one of the very few cases,,they were correct.

Mind your own business and you will be fine. If someone violates your rights, you have a bitch, until then you are just another busybody hiding behind a government gun.

[little jeremiah]

Sorry, they DID give it special protection. Sodomy - particularly same sex sodomy - has been illegal practically since time immemorial, and most if not all states had laws against it with rather strong penalties. This kept sodomy in the closet, where it belongs. No one minded, no one thought such laws unconstitutional. But now, because 1-2% of the population (roughly, could be as high as 2.4) want their sexual proclivities to be normalized - nay, glorified - and a larger percent of the sheeple - I mean the people who follow the liberal/leftist secular humanist/marxist style revisionist moral relativist one worlder philosophy - have now decided that sodomy is a guaranteed right under the Constitution. Funny how the actual guys who wrote the document thought it wasn't a protected act.

But now we know better, with a few generations of enlightenment from the ACLU and others of their ilk.

[Protagoras]

Sorry, but no new right was created and no "special" protection granted.

And to cite the length of time a bad law has been on the books as justification for it, is poor thinking taken to an artform. Many bad laws can be cited that meet your criteria.

I mean the people who follow the liberal/leftist secular humanist/marxist style revisionist moral relativist one worlder philosophy

Leave anyone out? LOL. Would all the people who disagree with you fall into that rather broad catagory?

I repeat, your rights are not being violated and therefore it is none of your business.

[John O]

I repeat, your rights are not being violated and therefore it is none of your business.

So lets say that little jeremiah decides to murder Protagoras. Since MY rights aren't being violated then I have nothing to say about it. The act is totally legal moral ethical etc because it doesn't violate my rights.

Or you could look at the complete picture. Now Protagoras' family is bereft and looking for revenge and this will cause ripples of effects throughout society as the fued expands. So the murder of Protagoras does affect my rights.

In the same way homosexual behavior affects all of society by increasing health care costs, increasing the presence of disease, increasing child molestations, damaging the family relationship etc. It affects my rights by destroying my country just as much as the murder of Protagoras would. In fact homosexual behavior damages my rights far more that the murder of P would.

[Protagoras]

So lets say that little jeremiah decides to murder Protagoras. Since MY rights aren't being violated then I have nothing to say about it.

Nice try at a childish play on words.

Consenting adults in this behavior violate no one's rights.