Skip to comments.
Capitol cops open a probe into leak (COVERUP!)
www.thehill.com ^
| November 18, 2003
| Alexander Bolton and Geoff Earle
Posted on 11/17/2003 9:28:01 PM PST by jmstein7
A complaint filed by Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) with the Senate sergeant at arms caused the Capitol Police to confiscate computer records of the Senate Judiciary Committee after sealing off the room.
Durbins complaint to William Pickle, the sergeant at arms, focused on memos written by Durbins staff in late 2001 about the opposition of liberal groups to President Bushs conservative nominees to the federal bench.
The memos were cited last Friday in an editorial that ran in The Wall Street Journal and in The Washington Times.
In a letter to Pickle, Durbin said that his office did not release these documents, nor did we authorize their release to anyone. Other than the original paper copies of these memos which are locked away in a file cabinet in my staffs Judiciary Committee offices, the only other copies are stored electronically on the Judiciary Committees computer server in an allegedly secure file area.
Therefore, it appears that the documents in question were taken without authorization and possibly illegally. This constitutes a serious breach of security and calls into question the [confidentiality] of Senate internal documents in both electronic and hard copy form.
Joe Shoemaker, Durbins spokesman, said the panels majority and minority staff, accompanied by Capitol Police, removed the backup files of the committees server.
They also sealed the office where the server was located and moved a staffer who normally worked in the area.
Both staffs share a single server, Shoemaker noted.
Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), the committees chairman, said there was no indication that the memos in question were either stolen or pilfered.
The leaked memos are the second set of private documents to cause a furor in the Senate. Earlier this month, Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) saw a confidential political memo laying out a critical approach on President Bushs handling on Iraqi intelligence matters leaked to Fox News.
Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) is drafting a letter to the Justice Department seeking a probe of that leak.
TOPICS: Breaking News; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: antiamericanism; antibush; blamethemessenger; breaking; bushbashing; crookeddemocrats; dc; durbin; estradamemo; judiciarycommittee; memogate; memogate2; obstructionists; rattricks; unamerican; waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-83 next last
Love this line:
" The leaked memos are the second set of private documents to cause a furor in the Senate. Earlier this month, Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) saw a confidential political memo laying out a critical approach on President Bushs handling on Iraqi intelligence matters leaked to Fox News."
Blame the cops for catching the robbers.
visit www.intelmemo.com
1
posted on
11/17/2003 9:28:02 PM PST
by
jmstein7
To: jmstein7
I wonder if the Dems would agree to an investigation into the leak of the "Pentagon Papers". How about grilling Woodward about "Deep Throat"?
Scumbags.
2
posted on
11/17/2003 9:30:13 PM PST
by
jmstein7
To: jmstein7
Okay, wait...which memos were these again?
3
posted on
11/17/2003 9:31:14 PM PST
by
stands2reason
(What you see at fight club is a generation of men raised by women. ~Chuck Palahniuk)
To: jmstein7
Somewhere last week somebody said that the dems would try to turn this around and make the main issue be the leaking of the documents being the Republicans' fault, instead of the stuff that's actually in the documents. Looks like they were right.
To: jmstein7
The reaction to getting caught in a traitorous act. Are any of us suprised?
5
posted on
11/17/2003 9:35:35 PM PST
by
doug from upland
(Why aren't the Clintons living out their remaining years on Alcatraz?)
To: Tuscaloosa Goldfinch
Pot. Kettle. Black. This is disgusting if the Senate Pubbies let the RATS get away with it.
6
posted on
11/17/2003 9:37:54 PM PST
by
ABG(anybody but Gore)
(Ashley Wilkes to Dave Asman: "You cannot speak that way to General Clark!!")
To: jmstein7; Dog; Howlin; Miss Marple
If you ask me .. The dems are worried about more memos being leaked
But my gut tells me it's too late
According to Hannity, the memo he rec'd didn't come from a Pubbie
Seems like there is a Dem out there that doesn't like the direction their party has taken
7
posted on
11/17/2003 9:39:52 PM PST
by
Mo1
To: jmstein7
Dickie durbin daley hack is lieing, how do i know his lips are moving, and bobbi kkk byrd has his hand up dickie's butt.
8
posted on
11/17/2003 9:39:57 PM PST
by
dts32041
(Is it time to practice decimation with our representatives?)
To: jmstein7

This works in our favor by bringing the Memogate issue back up in the press again, as well as by letting us get a similar investigation into which Dem leaked Rumsfeld's Iraq memo.
Maybe we can put Woodward/Bernstein into jail for leaking Watergate, ditto for an investigation into the Pentagon Papers. Senator Leahy needs to be jailed for getting one of our agents killed, too.
The Left won't like where all of this leads, not one little bit.
9
posted on
11/17/2003 9:41:29 PM PST
by
Southack
(Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Tuscaloosa Goldfinch
Somewhere last week somebody said that the dems would try to turn this around and make the main issue be the leaking of the documents being the Republicans' fault, instead of the stuff that's actually in the documents. Looks like they were right Maybe so .. but at the same time they are bringing more attention to an issue the media has been avoiding
IMO .. the Dems are afraid of what still may come out
10
posted on
11/17/2003 9:42:07 PM PST
by
Mo1
To: Southack
The Left won't like where all of this leads, not one little bit. I'm thinking the same thing ...
11
posted on
11/17/2003 9:43:34 PM PST
by
Mo1
To: jmstein7; Pukin Dog
The leaker is John Edwards..... I will bet some serious dough on this one.
Here is my reasoning:
Howard Dean is the anti-war candidate and way out in front. No democrat can take this guy out, only Bush proving the dems wrong about the intel that lead up to the war and the democrats playing politics with the war in Iraq. Only John Edwards stands to benifit from leaking these past documents and look at his latest comments on HardBall where he basically said he considered Saddam a serious threat and would have done exactly what George W. Bush had done.
John edwards is the only Presidential candidate on the Senate Select Intel Committee :-)
12
posted on
11/17/2003 9:47:00 PM PST
by
MJY1288
(The Democrats Have Reached Rock Bottom and The Digging Continues)
To: stands2reason; All
To: Mo1; Southack
"The Left won't like where all of this leads, not one little bit. Oh, what a weird, and wily web they weave......too bad...maybe it'll all finally catch up to them....
14
posted on
11/17/2003 9:48:08 PM PST
by
goodnesswins
(Goodness DOES win.)
To: MJY1288
Only John Edwards stands to benifit from leaking these past documents and look at his latest comments on HardBall where he basically said he considered Saddam a serious threat and would have done exactly what George W. Bush had done. Good Point
On another note .. Did you see the blow off that Hellary gave Edwards at the end of the Iowa rally this weekend?
She huged and smiled for pictures with all the Dem clowns .. but with Edwards it was a quick hand shake and she walked away
15
posted on
11/17/2003 9:52:11 PM PST
by
Mo1
To: jmstein7
HHMMMMM....bump
16
posted on
11/17/2003 9:53:48 PM PST
by
goodnesswins
(Goodness DOES win.)
To: doug from upland
This complaint is helpful. We do in fact need an investigation, and full disclosure of all of the facts, to the public. In fact, I would be in favor of televised hearings. The cynical duplicity of the Dims must get as much disclosure as possible. Nonetheless, the Dimo's hypicrisy knows know bounds.
17
posted on
11/17/2003 9:54:21 PM PST
by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
("...the right of THE PEOPLE to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.")
How about Dem Martin Frost's aid stealing a redistricting map from a conference room?
The Dems are going to try and portray this as the start of some kind of Watergate, we need to throw back in their face tons of examples of their own sticky fingers...
18
posted on
11/17/2003 10:01:55 PM PST
by
Diddle E. Squat
(www.firemackbrown.com, www.firecarlreese.com)
To: Mo1
That's because Hillary is complicant, Edwards has nothing but ex-Clinton campaign people working for him and none of these Democrats think they have a chance, and the last thing they want is Dean to win in 2004. She can not afford to be seen as someone who might be involved in this memo gate scandal.
Their only chance is 2008 and they know it. Why else wouldn't Dean be involved with the DLC? The DLC does not want Dean and they also know that when Zell Miller, Ed Koch, and several other leading democrats are supporting Bush right now, there is not much hope for 2004, so they are laying the groundwork for 2008
19
posted on
11/17/2003 10:05:12 PM PST
by
MJY1288
(The Democrats Have Reached Rock Bottom and The Digging Continues)
To: jmstein7
Leaks that would seem to harm Republicans are 24/7 newsworthy by the print, broadcast, and cable news outlets. Leaks that would seem to harm Democrats aren't.
The mainstream media's Hypocritic Oath is "do no harm" to democrats.
20
posted on
11/17/2003 10:09:52 PM PST
by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
To: jmstein7; chicagolady; mhking
CL? Please ping your chicago list
21
posted on
11/17/2003 10:24:39 PM PST
by
JustPiper
(All 19 of the hijackers entered the U.S. on valid visas- 18 of 19 had State Driver's Licenses!!!)
To: Pokey78; unspun; MightyMouseToSaveThe Day; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; Kathy in Alaska; ...
Ping!
22
posted on
11/17/2003 10:25:29 PM PST
by
JustPiper
(All 19 of the hijackers entered the U.S. on valid visas- 18 of 19 had State Driver's Licenses!!!)
To: doug from upland; All
Since FRN opened today their demand for Rockafella's resignation, I say we add Dick Durbin to it!!!
23
posted on
11/17/2003 10:27:04 PM PST
by
JustPiper
(All 19 of the hijackers entered the U.S. on valid visas- 18 of 19 had State Driver's Licenses!!!)
To: Mo1
It could just be Hilliary being she then could be the 'saviour' in '04
24
posted on
11/17/2003 10:27:48 PM PST
by
JustPiper
(All 19 of the hijackers entered the U.S. on valid visas- 18 of 19 had State Driver's Licenses!!!)
To: goodnesswins; Pro-Bush; FairOpinion; Sabertooth
ping
25
posted on
11/17/2003 10:28:52 PM PST
by
JustPiper
(All 19 of the hijackers entered the U.S. on valid visas- 18 of 19 had State Driver's Licenses!!!)
To: Mo1
Wouldn't it be ironic if all the Rats knew Edwards was the one who leaked? And if Hillary was involved in the conspiracy....
Then she blows him off - similar to a Mafia kiss. He gets the message that he's going to be thrown to the wolves.
26
posted on
11/17/2003 10:28:58 PM PST
by
Humidston
(Two Words: TERM LIMITS)
To: jmstein7
Democrats can't even handle confidential party memos, and they want to be in charge???? AAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
27
posted on
11/17/2003 10:34:43 PM PST
by
Chad Fairbanks
(All I want is a warm bed, a kind word and unlimited power.)
To: jmstein7
I knew it! This is the first step in the Dems denial of the Intel memo. Create the illusion that the repubs stole it.
28
posted on
11/17/2003 10:37:06 PM PST
by
cardinal4
(Hillary and Clark rhymes with Ft Marcy park...)
To: JustPiper
I hope they bag the snitch, don't hold your breathe though.
29
posted on
11/17/2003 10:38:03 PM PST
by
Pro-Bush
(Homeland Security + Tom Ridge = Open Borders --> Demand Change!)
To: Diddle E. Squat
"The Dems are going to try and portray this as the start of some kind of Watergate, we need to throw back in their face tons of examples of their own sticky fingers..."
Well, rey have a small problem this time...
In Watergate, the substance implicated Nixon.
Here, the substance (the memo content) impilcates the Dems. Do they really want the text of these memos splashed across the front page of every paper?
30
posted on
11/17/2003 10:42:11 PM PST
by
jmstein7
To: jmstein7
LOL, LOL, LOL !
31
posted on
11/17/2003 10:43:01 PM PST
by
ex-Texan
(CBS [SeeBS] Deserves a Long Double Flush . . . Pull the Chain!)
To: Humidston
Stop blaming Hellary, she would never get involved with a file scandal.
(cough cough)
32
posted on
11/17/2003 10:54:55 PM PST
by
carlson
To: Tuscaloosa Goldfinch
Somewhere last week somebody said that the dems would try to turn this around and make the main issue be the leaking of the documents being the Republicans' fault, instead of the stuff that's actually in the documents. I was one of a few posters who predicted it. It's standard operating procedure for the rats. The rat media has so far ignored the memo. They may go with the rat slant, though.
33
posted on
11/17/2003 11:26:20 PM PST
by
Jeff Chandler
(I'm a racist, you're a racist, we're all racists, hey!)
To: jmstein7
Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) is drafting a letter to the Justice Department seeking a probe of that leak. Good ole, round-heeled Pubbies.
34
posted on
11/17/2003 11:27:27 PM PST
by
Jeff Chandler
(I'm a racist, you're a racist, we're all racists, hey!)
To: jmstein7
Sean Hannity is just aching to be called before the committee.
35
posted on
11/17/2003 11:28:42 PM PST
by
Jeff Chandler
(I'm a racist, you're a racist, we're all racists, hey!)
To: jmstein7
Therefore, it appears that the documents in question were taken without authorization and possibly illegally. This constitutes a serious breach of security and calls into question the [confidentiality] of Senate internal documents in both electronic and hard copy form. With December just around the corner, do you suppose that Time Magazine will herald the "whistle-blowers" as People Of The Year again?
-PJ
To: jmstein7
You'd think that a prominent Republican had leaked some illegally recorded tapes of a cell phone conversation by they way they are hollering.
Trapped like Rats.
37
posted on
11/18/2003 12:23:36 AM PST
by
weegee
To: weegee
Dy'all think thisa may FINALLY go somewhere, or do we need to start writing.................?
38
posted on
11/18/2003 12:38:50 AM PST
by
oreolady
(Have you reviewed your living will lately?)
To: weegee
Dy'all think thisa may FINALLY go somewhere, or do we need to start writing.................?
39
posted on
11/18/2003 12:39:07 AM PST
by
oreolady
(Have you reviewed your living will lately?)
To: oreolady
oops,sorry!!!
40
posted on
11/18/2003 12:39:33 AM PST
by
oreolady
(Have you reviewed your living will lately?)
To: MJY1288
I posted the same thing when the Memogate story first appeared on an earlier thread. People scoffed.
My money's on Edwards. Dem or no, he sincerely believes the war in Iraq is justified, and he's holding to that position regardless that it dooms his presidential ambitions.
The Dems are heading off the cliff once more, that's obvious. Edwards thinks he is doing right by the party, thinks his beliefs will be vindicated sooner or later, and prefers sooner.
Of course he wouldn't get the nomination in any event, and whoever does will get creamed in '04. But Edwards is young. He can run in '08, '12 and beyond. He can't run from his voting record, and he can't run from what he knows by being on the committee.
To: jmstein7
Traitors @ work BUMP
42
posted on
11/18/2003 3:20:17 AM PST
by
putupon
("I had rather be right than President."------ Henry Clay)
To: jmstein7
Democraps and SECURITY are mutually exclusive!
To: Mo1
IMO .. the Dems are afraid of what still may come out.I agree with you. That treasonous memo is undoubtedly the least of it. Paging Mr. Leaker...
44
posted on
11/18/2003 4:12:33 AM PST
by
mewzilla
To: JustPiper
Add the whale from Taxachusetts - he referred to minorities as Neanderthals!
To: jmstein7
As I understand this, only 2 people know who leaked the memo. Those two are Sean Hannity and the unnamed source.
It might be a good idea for Sean to secure a few bodyguards. Arkancide has been known to affect persons associated with some certain persons associated with politics.
46
posted on
11/18/2003 4:28:41 AM PST
by
TomGuy
To: jmstein7
Finally... Bray King Nuze about Vince Foster !!! ;-)) .
47
posted on
11/18/2003 4:41:19 AM PST
by
GeekDejure
(<H3> Searching For The Meaning Of "Huge" Fonts !!!</H3>)
To: All
Could the memo in question be the one that Rush talked about today?
In private, the Democrat memo said nothing about Estrada not answering questions - which of course every senator had a chance to put to him though the ones screaming the loudest never did. No, all they write is that he's "dangerous" because he's a Latino. That's the Democrats today, folks: scared of any minority who dares think for himself or herself.
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_111703/content/stack_a.member.html
48
posted on
11/18/2003 4:50:27 AM PST
by
Terp
(Retired US Navy now living in Philippines were the Moutains meet the Sea in the Land of Smiles)
To: TomGuy
As I understand this, only 2 people know who leaked the memo. Those two are Sean Hannity and the unnamed source. There's one more who knows: His call screener/producer, Sweet Baby James.
To: jmstein7
My goodness gracious.
We may find a mintful more of treasonous memos.
What a great development!
I hope they make a special effort to recover attempts at erasing...
50
posted on
11/18/2003 5:10:07 AM PST
by
Publius6961
(40% of Californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-83 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson