Skip to comments.
Dyson: Why did McGruder target Rice in "Boondocks" strips?
Poynter.org ^
| 11.16.03
| Michele Dyson
Posted on 11/17/2003 4:55:26 PM PST by mhking
Dyson: Why did McGruder target Rice in "Boondocks" strips?
Washington Post
Michele Dyson says her pals and business associates are still talking about last month's "Boondocks" strips involving Condoleezza Rice. Why did Aaron McGruder decide to go after her? asks Dyson. "Was McGruder so unable to think of anything refined or polished to make his point about foreign policy that he just grabbed hold of the sexism grenade, pulled the pin and hoped for some casualties?"
Posted at 11:02:19 AM
| QuickLink this item: A54842
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aaronmcgruder; condoleezzarice
1
posted on
11/17/2003 4:55:27 PM PST
by
mhking
To: mhking

Bump.
2
posted on
11/17/2003 4:56:21 PM PST
by
Southack
(Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; Teacher317; ...
Black conservative pingIf you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)
Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.
3
posted on
11/17/2003 4:56:22 PM PST
by
mhking
To: mhking
Yeah. And no paper can cancel the strip because they'd be mau-mau'ed with idiots screaming RACIST!
To: mhking
Why does Michele Dyson talk about an angry, bitter hack like MacGruder months after the fact?
5
posted on
11/17/2003 5:00:48 PM PST
by
AmishDude
To: mhking
Why did Aaron McGruder decide to go after her? asks Dyson.
Because he is a liberal no class jerk.
6
posted on
11/17/2003 5:02:16 PM PST
by
tet68
( Patrick Henry ......."Who fears the wrath of cowards?")
To: mhking
My view is that he went insane after the war started. McGruder can occasionally be funny especially on cultural issues - but after the war he just got weird for the most part. Like the "find Condi a man" obsession over the past few weeks.
7
posted on
11/17/2003 5:02:40 PM PST
by
garbanzo
(Free people will set the course of history)
To: mhking
I pay to watch the aftermath of Mcgruder mouthing off to Condi face to face. She'd go old school Alabama girl on him.
To: garbanzo
I tend to agree with you on this one. I found one or two of his strips to be funny but he quickly devolved into hysterical shrillness.
Contrary to what some folks say around FR, I like the way he draws the comic, I just don't like the content. It must be sad for him to be so furious at the world. He is a classic revolutionary punk.
9
posted on
11/17/2003 5:06:17 PM PST
by
Arioch7
To: AmishDude
Why does Michele Dyson talk about an angry, bitter hack like MacGruder months after the fact? (from the article)
"In discussions about the comic strip, people would ask me whether I thought the series was humorous comment poking fun at serious events in government or whether I saw it as cheap shot using sexism as the weapon of attack.
The topic still is coming up, even now, almost a month later, so I decided to give it some "back of the envelope" figuring."
To: CaptBlack
Well, I was being a bit rhetorical, actually.
To: mhking
PLAYER HATER... He got drunk on the haterade. That's why.
12
posted on
11/17/2003 5:09:33 PM PST
by
cyborg
(liberals are the tapeworms in the intestine of America)
To: mhking
The Boondocks" addresses a hip-hop culture of racial diversity. McGruder says he hopes that his comic strip improves the state of racial discourse. Why did Aaron McGruder decide to go after Condoleezza Rice? Personally, I think its just intellectual laziness on McGruder's part. He's jumping on the "bash conservatives" bandwagon, which is so fashionable these days, and Ms. Rice is a safe target for him.
13
posted on
11/17/2003 5:10:59 PM PST
by
BraveMan
To: mhking
McGruder going after the National Security Advisor is not nearly as bad as the Chairman of the NAACP (Julian Bond) agreeing with him. The NAACP is allegedly a non-partisan orgainization (EXTREMELY HEAVY SARCASM). Of course both McGruder and Bond are Useful Idiots of the Left.
-Regards, T.
14
posted on
11/17/2003 5:13:39 PM PST
by
T Lady
(Who Let the 'RATS Out?!!)
To: AmishDude
For the same reason Dvorkin
wrote about Terry Gross' interview of Bill O'Reilly long after the fact. Because enough people disagreed with what the media outlet did, and complained about it, that it elicited -- even necessitated -- a response. That's a good practice.
15
posted on
11/17/2003 5:24:05 PM PST
by
coulson3
To: mhking
This question took more thought. Many others have held the post of national security adviser before Rice, among them Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski and Sandy Berger. Each had his severe critics, and each made his share of mistakes. Yet no one ever dared to suggest that finding these men a new "squeeze" would make the world a safer place.
This merely exemplifies Leftist hypocrisy. Just as they couldn't see anything wrong with Bubba's frolicking with a woman half his age, cheating on his wife 100+ times, rape allegations... Just as they couldn't resist pointing out Linda Tripp's appearance...>
There is a double standard. The above things are only 'outrageous' if the other side does it. This also illustrates their cynicism as well. They don't really care about these things either. They are only trotted out as weapons against their political opponents.
16
posted on
11/17/2003 5:30:28 PM PST
by
walford
(Dogmatism swings both ways)
To: mhking
Condi is my odds on favorite to be the Republican 2004 Presidental candidate. She needs to drift a little more conservative in her domestic views, but I think that she will.
17
posted on
11/17/2003 5:34:39 PM PST
by
Tom D.
To: mhking
You can't be funny and meanly partisan at the same time. MacGruder, who can be funny, has chosen to be mean instead.
the same thing happened to Art Buchwald, who was once a pretty funny guy but who became so consumed with hatred for Nixon, he lost it all.
18
posted on
11/17/2003 5:46:36 PM PST
by
altura
To: mhking
Why did Aaron McGruder decide to go after her? Aaron McGruder thinks Condi is hot, but he's angry that she never bothered to acknowledge his invitations to go out with him.
19
posted on
11/17/2003 5:52:29 PM PST
by
Alouette
(My son, the Learned Elder of Zion)
To: Tom D.
"Condi is my odds on favorite to be the Republican 2004 Presidental candidate."
My God. Las Vegas must be salivating for someone of your obvious odds making capabilities.
20
posted on
11/17/2003 5:59:29 PM PST
by
billhilly
(If you're lurking here from DU, I trust this post will make you sick)
To: walford
There is a double standard. The above things are only 'outrageous' if the other side does it. This also illustrates their cynicism as well. They don't really care about these things either. They are only trotted out as weapons against their political opponents.B I N G O !
You hit the nail on the head, it's a power play, pure and simple!
21
posted on
11/17/2003 6:13:48 PM PST
by
StACase
To: T Lady
He and Bond share a bond. Both have gotten a free ride for years so that none of their idiocy was ever labelled as such. The result is that they really believe that their idiocy is wisdom.
22
posted on
11/17/2003 6:54:11 PM PST
by
AmericanVictory
(Should we be more like them, or they like us?)
To: T Lady
He and Bond share a bond. Both have gotten a free ride for years so that none of their idiocy was ever labelled as such. The result is that they really believe that their idiocy is wisdom.
23
posted on
11/17/2003 6:54:16 PM PST
by
AmericanVictory
(Should we be more like them, or they like us?)
To: Tom D.
I think you may mean 2008. IMO, that's still too early - she has the managerial experience, but she needs an elected office under her belt. If she can win a gubernatorial office and get re-elected, she's viable.
To: walford
I agree with you...Where are the howls of outrage from NOW over all this sexism???;)
To: Slings and Arrows
I think you may mean 2008. IMO, that's still too early - she has the managerial experience, but she needs an elected office under her belt. If she can win a gubernatorial office and get re-elected, she's viable.I see her as a good VP pick in 2008. She's draw soccer moms, nascar dads, conservatives, and a whole lotta people in the middle.
The same people who would vote against her, would vote against anyone republican no matter what, so she does have a good appeal to anyone who is both republican and or undecided.
26
posted on
11/17/2003 10:58:54 PM PST
by
Sonny M
("oderint dum metuant")
To: Sonny M
Agreed. It would help if she shifted right on abortion, but beyond that she's good veep material.
To: Sonny M
I would say she needs to be the P candidate in 2008. Remember, the Dems ARE going to run Hillary in 2008. I mean, hell, she's not even running in 2004 and she's leading the Dem pack. Think! In 2008 the Repubs can NOT afford to be seen as the party of rich white men. Rice is the only candidate that can counter the vast left-minded Hillary masses, and make no mistake, they are VAST.
To: Slings and Arrows
You are quite correct that I intended to say 2008. You may be correct that it would not hurt her to get elected gov. somewhere. I would offer my home state, North Carolina.
29
posted on
11/18/2003 4:44:33 AM PST
by
Tom D.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson