Skip to comments.
SafeSurf Considers Heterosexuals dangerous to Children?
Arkansas Publik Skulz ^
| 15 Nov 2003
Posted on 11/15/2003 8:09:27 PM PST by steplock

SafeSurf - Heterosexuals are Dangerous to Children Date: Saturday, November 15 @ 20:00:19 Topic Opinions
|
SafeSurf Considers Heterosexuals dangerous to Children SafeSurf Rating
Since 1975 - Safe Surf - Creating a Child Safe Internet - dedicated to both advancing the process of classifying information on the Internet.
"Our first goal is to classify material which may be harmful to children. Responsible choices can then be easily made and systems can be put into place that will screen adult material, restricting the access to minors."
The SafeSurf SS~~ Rating Standard Designed with input from thousands of parents and Net citizens to empower each family to make informed decisions concerning accessibility of online content.
Section One: Adult Themes with Caution Levels
SS~~000. Age Range 1) All Ages 2) Older Children 3) Teens 4) Older Teens 5) Adult Supervision Recommended 6) Adults 7) Limited to Adults 8) Adults Only 9) Explicitly for Adults
Section One: Adult Themes with Caution Levels
SS~~001. Profanity 1) Subtle Innuendo Subtly Implied through the use of Slang 2) Explicit Innuendo Explicitly implied through the use of Slang 3) Technical Reference Dictionary, encyclopedic, news, technical references 4) Non-Graphic-Artistic Limited non-sexual expletives used in a artistic fashion 5) Graphic-Artistic Non-sexual expletives used in a artistic fashion 6) Graphic Limited use of expletives and obscene gestures 7) Detailed Graphic Casual use of expletives and obscene gestures. 8) Explicit Vulgarity Heavy use of vulgar language and obscene gestures. Unsupervised Chat Rooms. 9) Explicit and Crude Saturated with crude sexual references and gestures. Unsupervised Chat Rooms.
Author: This section has just been recently added SS~~002. Heterosexual Themes
1) Subtle Innuendo Subtly Implied through the use of metaphor 2) Explicit Innuendo Explicitly implied (not described) through the use of metaphor 3) Technical Reference Dictionary, encyclopedic, news, medical references 4) Non-Graphic-Artistic Limited metaphoric descriptions used in an artistic fashion 5) Graphic-Artistic Metaphoric descriptions used in an artistic fashion Author: The rest in this section are already referred to in other categories. 6) Graphic Descriptions of intimate sexual acts 7) Detailed Graphic Descriptions of intimate details of sexual acts 8) Explicitly Graphic or Inviting Participation Explicit Descriptions of intimate details of sexual acts designed to arouse. Inviting interactive sexual participation. Unsupervised Sexual Chat Rooms or Newsgroups. 9) Explicit and Crude or Explicitly Inviting Participation Profane Graphic Descriptions of intimate details of sexual acts designed to arouse. Inviting interactive sexual participation. Unsupervised Sexual Chat Rooms or Newsgroups.
SS~~003. Homosexual Themes 1) Subtle Innuendo Subtly Implied through the use of metaphor 2) Explicit Innuendo Explicitly implied (not described) through the use of metaphor 3) Technical Reference Dictionary, encyclopedic, news, medical references 4) Non-Graphic-Artistic Limited metaphoric descriptions used in an artistic fashion 5) Graphic-Artistic Metaphoric descriptions used in an artistic fashion 6) Graphic Descriptions of intimate sexual acts 7) Detailed Graphic Descriptions of intimate details of sexual acts 8) Explicitly Graphic or Inviting Participation Explicit descriptions of intimate details of sexual acts designed to arouse. Inviting interactive sexual participation. Unsupervised Sexual Chat Rooms or Newsgroups. 9) Explicit and Crude or Explicitly Inviting Participation Profane Graphic Descriptions of intimate details of sexual acts designed to arouse. Inviting interactive sexual participation. Unsupervised Sexual Chat Rooms or Newsgroups.
SS~~004. Nudity 1) Subtle Innuendo Subtly Implied through the use of composition, lighting, shaping, revealing clothing, etc. 2) Explicit Innuendo Explicitly implied (not shown) through the use of composition, lighting, shaping or revealing clothing 3) Technical Reference Dictionary, encyclopedic, news, medical references 4) Non-Graphic-Artistic Classic works of art presented in public museums for family viewing 5) Graphic-Artistic Artistically presented without full frontal nudity 6) Graphic Artistically presented with frontal nudity 7) Detailed Graphic Erotic frontal nudity 8) Explicit Vulgarity Pornographic presentation, designed to appeal to prurient interests. 9) Explicit and Crude Explicit pornographic presentation
SS~~005. Violence 1) Subtle Innuendo 2) Explicit Innuendo 3) Technical Reference 4) Non-Graphic-Artistic 5) Graphic-Artistic 6) Graphic 7) Detailed Graphic 8) Inviting Participation in Graphic Interactive Format 9) Encouraging Personal Participation, Weapon Making
SS~~006. Sex, Violence, and Profanity 1) Subtle Innuendo 2) Explicit Innuendo 3) Technical Reference 4) Non-Graphic-Artistic 5) Graphic-Artistic 6) Graphic 7) Detailed Graphic 8) Explicit Vulgarity 9) Explicit and Crude
Author: Recent activist judges have classified Christianity as "Offensive & Intolerant" SS~~007. Intolerance - (Intolerance of another person's racial, religious, or gender backround)
1) Subtle Innuendo 2) Explicit Innuendo 3) Technical Reference 4) Non-Graphic-Literary 5) Graphic-Literary 6) Graphic Discussions 7) Endorsing Hatred 8) Endorsing Violent or Hateful Action 9) Advocating Violent or Hateful Action
SS~~008. Glorifying Drug Use 1) Subtle Innuendo 2) Explicit Innuendo 3) Technical Reference 4) Non-Graphic-Artistic 5) Graphic-Artistic 6) Graphic 7) Detailed Graphic 8) Simulated Interactive Participation 9) Soliciting Personal Participation
SS~~009. Other Adult Themes 1) Subtle Innuendo 2) Explicit Innuendo 3) Technical Reference 4) Non-Graphic-Artistic 5) Graphic-Artistic 6) Graphic 7) Detailed Graphic 8) Explicit Vulgarity 9) Explicit and Crude
SS~~00A. Gambling 1) Subtle Innuendo 2) Explicit Innuendo 3) Technical Discussion 4) Non-Graphic-Artistic, Advertising 5) Graphic-Artistic, Advertising 6) Simulated Gambling 7) Real Life Gambling without Stakes 8) Encouraging Interactive Real Life Participation with Stakes 9) Providing Means with Stakes
The numeral order of the adult themes listed above is not intended to suggest any more or less caution be given to higher numbered themes. To avoid confusion with the Level of Parental Caution (described below), we advise software developers to present only the theme's description without mentioning its numerical position on the list.
|
This article comes from Arkansas Publik Skulz http://www.gohotsprings.com/school/
The URL for this story is: http://www.gohotsprings.com/school/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=305 |
|
|
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: heterosexual; intolerance; rating; religion
SafeSurf - I have used them to classify my web sites since I began creating them a few years ago. It was a great idea to centralize an area where parents could go and find websites that would not offend honest and moral and normal people.
I KNOW I'm going to be "flammed" for the "NORMAL" term, but I don't care because that is reality. Can anyone remember back only 20-30 years ago to what was considered to be acceptable and NORMAL behavior?
I can remember and I still have my morals and memories of what is CORRECT.
1
posted on
11/15/2003 8:09:28 PM PST
by
steplock
To: steplock
Just goes to show you, the only reliable content filter is your own head.
2
posted on
11/15/2003 8:16:28 PM PST
by
xrp
To: steplock
The idea here is that the parents set their own 'acceptable levels' for each category, right? So what's the problem?
I wouldn't be surprised if the 'heterosexual' category exists primarily because (1) the makers of SafeSurf recognized the demand for a 'homosexual' category, but (2) did not want to themselves discriminate against homosexuals. So even if many people decide to e.g. set the homosexual limit to 1 and the heterosexual limit to 4, it won't be SafeSurf discriminating against gay sites.
3
posted on
11/15/2003 8:43:28 PM PST
by
supercat
(Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
To: steplock
What about Homo Sapiens or Homer-Sexuals?
4
posted on
11/15/2003 8:48:42 PM PST
by
UNGN
(I've been here since '98 but had nothing to say until now)
To: steplock
WHEW!!! at least bestiality is still OK.
5
posted on
11/15/2003 9:47:55 PM PST
by
drhogan
To: xrp
Totally agree. Internet filters are a lazy parent's babysitter.
To: steplock
Since 1975? 1975!? What was SafeSurf doing in 1975? Is that a misprint, maybe?
7
posted on
11/15/2003 11:23:38 PM PST
by
Salman
(Mickey Akbar)
To: Salman
Did I say 1975?? Oooops!
HISTORY IN THE MAKING
Creating a Child Safe Internet
The major events that have lead to the current state of Cyberspace.
http://www.safesurf.com/time.htm JANUARY 1995 and before
Adult Only Cyberspace
FEBRUARY 1995
Exon Amendment Introduced
SafeSurf Advocates Rating System
MAY 1995
SafeSurf Creates Kid's Wave
SurfWatch Ships Software
8
posted on
11/16/2003 6:24:15 AM PST
by
steplock
(www.FOCUS.GOHOTSPRINGS.com)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson