Alabama A.G. who prosecuted Roy Moore is a Bush judicial nominee

NewsMax ^

[wdkeller]

...Republicans scheduled the talkathon, called "Justice for Judges," in hopes of rallying Americans against Democrats, who have blocked four U.S. Appeals Court nominees so far: Alabama Attorney General WILLIAM PRYOR, Texas judge Priscilla Owen, Mississippi judge Charles Pickering and lawyer Miguel Estrada...

[wdkeller]

I don't care if the 'Rats DO block this clown's nomination. Far as I'm concerned, he can rot in Hell.

[Clara Lou]

for later...

[maestro]

U.N. rule forever!

/sarcasm?

[TankerKC]

Lovely attitude.

[Uncle Jaque]

Wouldn't it be just a HOOT if President BUSH appointed, over the upcoming Congressional Recess, Judge MOORE to a Federal Appeals Court?

And, along with the current Nominees, appointed "Nute" GINGRICH and Judge BORKE to the Federal Bench as well, just for fun?

Why not?; The libs, Dems, ACLU, ABA and everyone else involved in the systematic atheization of America utterly detest Pres. BUSH and Judge MOORE about equally already, so who's to "offend" other than our idealogical enemies, such a Hellary, Dashhole, Teddy the swimmer, and the "Nine Mondales" (as Drudge calls 'em)?

I kind of doubt that the "kinder, gentler, new-tone" RINO party elite would ever allow that sort of bravado to surface (unfortunately) but I don't think that I'm the only member of what used to be referred to as "The Conservative Base" who would just love to see that rammed up the Sociocrats tailpipe hard and cross-threaded in.

President BUSH tried to set this "New Tone" of bipartisan cooperation and civility in Washington, but has been rewarded with nothing other than partisan contempt, emnity, slander and obstruction from the Dems.

So if they want to re-define "new tone", then why not accept it accordingly - only not on the one-way track that they seem to expect it to run.

Let's let 'em have a good dose of their own bilge right back, in full measure, shaken down, and packed in tight.

With interest.

I predect that if it were, the reaction on the left - including the syncophantic media, would be no less that apoplectic!

But honestly, now; do they deserve any less?

Dr. Frist; Nice start with the Senate "discussion" thing; you can let go of the other ankle any time now.

Mr. Graham; do you really have to be so bloomin' ashamed of even being accused of being a little "Conservative"?
Whose Party are you supposed to be "leading", anyhow?

Might we actually have a CHOICE on Election day, 2004?
Is that too much to ask?

"Conservatism"; It's an ideaology, not a flamin' disease, already!

Not only that, it actually WORKED for President Ronaldus Magnus Regan, and seems to have worked in our current POTUS favor - in spite of the "conventional political wisdom" that any position to the right of "center" (which the Libs continue to define, as near as I can tell) is tantimount to politicl suicide.

So let's try again, just for fun...

Can't we?

[wgeorge2001]

"Wouldn't it be just a HOOT if President BUSH appointed, over the upcoming Congressional Recess, Judge MOORE to a Federal Appeals Court?
And, along with the current Nominees, appointed "Nute" GINGRICH and Judge BORKE to the Federal Bench as well, just for fun?"

It would be wonderful and a brilliant move and would seal his base Christian conservative vote in the 2004 election; I hope he would appoint Justice Roy Moore to the supreme court, after that and I would have so much more respect and admiration for him in this evil time of athiest liberalism and hostility towards bible believing Christians.
The LORD Jesus Christ works all things to the good for them that love him and who are the called according to his purpose.
We are living in very interesting times.

[Uncle Jaque]

It would, indeed, be a marvelous coup. The people he'd utterly enrage are not voting for him anyway, and a few of his perhaps former "base" might be sufficiently encouraged by this show of courage and initiative to preserve our Constitutional system that we might actually bother to show up at the polls next year.

As to the "RINOs", who are they gonna vote for; Democrats?

I don't think so.

Hey Chairman GRAHAM; does that term seem a little familiar to ya?

---

wgeorge2001; Romans 8:28 and Interesting times indeed!

About the coming together of the "EU"; what is your take on that?

Reconstituted Roman Empire?

"Ten Horns"?

Is Mr. 666 among us already?

Pretrib/Midtrib/ or posttrib Rapture?

Do you occasionally feel a little guilty, as I do, having read the Book and knowing how this all is going to wash out in the end?

Shalom - UJ in ME

[Viva Le Dissention]

Judge MOORE to a Federal Appeals Court?

After he gets disbarred, that might present a pretty significant obstacle to overcome.

[Scenic Sounds]

After he gets disbarred, that might present a pretty significant obstacle to overcome.

LOL. They're not gonna disbar him. ;-)

[jackbill]

In arguing the case for Pryor's nomination, the Republicans were saying that, regardless of his "deeply held beliefs", he would follow the law. Isn't that exactly what Pryor did?

[Viva Le Dissention]

We'll see.

[Chancellor Palpatine]

Another hysterical post brought to us by the folks from:

[breakem]

"prosecute" ????

[lugsoul]

Sure. That's a great idea. Appoint a guy who has no respect for the judiciary and who believes that Federal judges basically have no power to do anything to be a Federal judge.

That makes about as much sense as all the homoerotic subtext in your post.

[ContemptofCourt]

How funny...go Pryor!

Note to Christian Conservatives: you can't be the Chief Justice of a State Supreme Court and openly refuse to abide by a court order. Kinda hard to make rulings yourself when you refuse to follow ones that you don't like.

[Chancellor Palpatine]

ROFL

[Britton J Wingfield]

In arguing the case for Pryor's nomination, the Republicans were saying that, regardless of his "deeply held beliefs", he would follow the law. Isn't that exactly what Pryor did?

Exactly.

[Britton J Wingfield]

In arguing the case for Pryor's nomination, the Republicans were saying that, regardless of his "deeply held beliefs", he would follow the law. Isn't that exactly what Pryor did?

Exactly.

[Uncle Jaque]

Gaw-lee!; I've been called all sorts of things over the years, but I do believe that's a first for "Homoerotic"!

May we safely assume, before digging out the Webster's New World Dictionary, that it was intended as an insult?

It shore is a dilly! }8^{P~

[Uncle Jaque]

"...Iif it warn't fer bayid luck I'd hayve no luck at awl..."

Yup, Pilgrim; looks like you've got me pretty well pegged, all right.

I'se an American Redneck - an' durn proud of it, I might add!

Y'all come back now, Y'heah?!

[wgeorge2001]

wgeorge2001; Romans 8:28 and Interesting times indeed!

About the coming together of the "EU"; what is your take on that?

Reconstituted Roman Empire? Yes.

"Ten Horns"? Yes; I believe that the first 10 nations that joined are the prophetic 10 in their relationship to Israel.

Is Mr. 666 among us already? Perhaps a well beloved anti-christian (perhaps even a religious)politician coming up in Europe?

Pretrib/Midtrib/ or posttrib Rapture? Pretrib.

Do you occasionally feel a little guilty, as I do, having read the Book and knowing how this all is going to wash out in the end? No, not so much guilty as looking for the LORD Jesus appearing and hoping it's sooner rather than later.

May his peace be on you in the coming days.

[wgeorge2001]

"In arguing the case for Pryor's nomination, the Republicans were saying that, regardless of his "deeply held beliefs", he would follow the law. Isn't that exactly what Pryor did? "


Pryor followed unconstituional laws as dictated by the twisted liberal left who also say the right to keep and bear arms is illegal and their is a seperation of church and state in the constitution and send more money to fix the moral breakdown of the educational system and many other lies they have incrementally pushed into the culture.
Do you really want your children to believe men like Ted Kennedy and Tom Daschle are who and what they pretend to be?
I and those who are conservatives and liberal hearted toward our fellow man know that the injustice of this matter was that a legitimate and honest and godly man was assaulted and cruelly and unjustly "victimized " by the LORD GOD hating left wing liars and thieves and killers who use foolish men like Pryor to do their dirty work.

[Uncle Jaque]

Right on.

This was covered in a pior thread about the Decalougue issue in the 'Bamma Supreme Court; an argument advanced, and one which I concur with, was essentially -

When the "Law" demands that we register all civilian firearms, why; we simply must, of course.

It's the Law.

And later, when the government decides that all of these dangerous weapons must be taken out of "the wrong hands" and demands the surrender of all privately owned fireams (with the probable exception of the Aristocracy and Leadership Elite, of course) naturally we will comply.

After all, who wants to risk loss of much or all of their assetts and property, their job, reputation, and possibly Family?

And who but a fool would risk imprisonment over some silly, old fashioned concept of "Civil Rights", anyway?

We'll be better off without all those guns around.
It's for the Children, don't you see?

And when the 'Law' demands that all Jews and any who claim Christ as Savior first surrender their Children to the State Revolutionary Rectification Centers before boarding the cattle-cars at the railroad depot bound for the concentration camps / extermination factories, we will promptly and meekly comply - won't we?

Of course we will; it's the "LAW".

Or it will be, AGAIN, if the Socialists and their Politician / Lawyer / ACLU / Media Friends have their way in stacking the Courts and nullifying our Constitution, in all probablility.

And I'd say that they are doing a pretty efficient job of it so far.

Besides; who can resist the Government and thier "Laws"?

After all; they have all the guns.

Now before anyone out there starts hurling the "Paranoid / kook" accusitions this way, let me remind you (especially those of us reared, according to the Law, in the government public indoctrination system); this is no idle speculation, or fear born out of a paranoid fantasy.

It actually happened - within the lifetimes of many who are still among us and remember all too well.

As well as millions who would probably still be with us, had they survived it.

Courtesy of the European National Democratic Socialist Party, wasn't it?

Oh yes; LOTS of Christians who would not capitulate to Hitler's demands went right along with the Armenians, Jews, and others deemed unworty of life on a planet to be dominated by the "Super-Race" to the slave labor camps, gas chambers, and incinerators.

Read Corrie Ten Boom's "No Hiding Place" some time.

So for those of us who either failed or are unwilling to learn from History - epecially RECENT History; Stand by to repeat it.

I can almost smell the sickening stench of burning human flesh pouring out of the smokestacks now.

The line starts on the left.

It's the LAW.

[Princeliberty]

Blocking Pryor would be a good way for Southern Democrat
Senator to GAIN votes.

Try using that against them and you'd have your head
handed to you.

[Princeliberty]

And as for the latter comment looks like he's headed
that way.

[Princeliberty]

He swore an oath to uphold the Constitution of
the United States and the Constitution of Alabama
not the illegal order of a Judge.

What part of the Constitution did he violate
what was the Constititional basis for the
Federal Judge's order?

Our founding fathers did the same thing they
followed the true law and resfused to obey
the illegal orders of a King who was violating
the true law?

Were are founding fathers wrong?

Would have you been on the other side?

[Princeliberty]

It would be a great move but Bush sure doesn't have
it in him.

If he only did.