Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FRNCC - "The Cork In Rush’s Bat" By Luis Gonzales
Free Republic Network ^ | 10-23-03 | Luis Gonzales

Posted on 10/24/2003 12:22:00 PM PDT by Bob J

FRN Columnists' Corner

"The Cork In Rush’s Bat"

By Luis Gonzales

Like Miami’s Dave Barry, I’ve been an avid Marlins fan for several weeks now, and watched the Marlins/Cubs series religiously (which coincidentally is the same way I approach Church attendance; about once a year, and during a specific season…but never mind that, we’re talking sports and politics right now).

I grew a passionate and ardent (is that redundant, or did I just repeat myself?), dislike for the Cubs—whom as I came to find out reside in Chicago, which is north of here. A fact that explained why there where always a gazillion fans in our stadium for their games, but no Marlins fans in theirs, as most northbound travel by south Floridians dead ends in any motel in the general vicinity of Disney World that features a free continental breakfast—the moment I found out that they were a baseball team, and that they would be playing my beloved Marlins, which is a fish (one that doesn’t get a lot of exposure because it’s not generally found in sushi menus) as are all championship teams in Florida, with the possible exception of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, the Florida State Seminoles, the University of Miami Hurricanes, the University of Florida Gators, the Jacksonville Jaguars, and perhaps several others. Cubs, on the other hand, are apparently some species of goat, at least according to everything I saw written about them on Internet forums this past few weeks.

My dislike for these Cubs grew as we graciously allowed them to score runs at will, and they, in very unsportsmanlike manner I might add, refused to return the favor; something I attributed to their frustration at playing non-stop baseball with no significant results since the Taft administration. That of course, along with the fact that the inconvenient game scheduling, caused many TIVo controversies between the games, Bachelor Bob in the evenings, and a similarly named sponge in the afternoons (or maybe, it was the other way around) didn’t help the goats make friends in this Marlin household.

I did come to learn an interesting fact about one of the stars of the goats from the windy city while watching the series: he had apparently behaved badly somewhere along the way to the championship and broken a bat, exposing the corked center, which is against League rules. This led me to another learned fact, and I was finally able to explain to my seven year-old t-ball star how they could make metal bats that weighed so little. I could not however, explain to him how the goat superstar had avoided punishment by being sent to the batter’s box, which as we had both learned from watching hockey some years ago when the Florida Panthers made the playoffs, is where players that behave badly get to serve their time-outs. We figured that he was much too important a goat for time-out.

It was while listening to the radio one afternoon that I learned about the curious tradition of yelling “CORK!” anytime the aforementioned goat star shattered a bat, unless of course, you were a fan of the Goats, in which case, you pretended that the whole cork thing had either been a huge misunderstanding, or had not happened at all. It does appear however, that even when the bat doesn’t break, the ghost of the cork rears its ugly head, and every hit made by the goat star will here and forever more be seen as questionable, which is not a good thing for the fans of the goat from Chicago named Cubs.

I learned all these things while flipping stations between Bachelor Bob, the similarly-named sponge, the ball games, and the news about the political sports commentator who made a politically incorrect observation about the facts that A) some quarterback was not as good as everyone said he was, and B) that he was black, both statements, while both being true in and of themselves, apparently, when used in the same sentence became a truth that no one was allowed to mention, so he had to quit commenting. Soon after that, this very same commentator confessed to breaking some rules, and secluded himself from his job, trying to escape further scrutiny, or maybe even trying to do the right thing, but it appears that the other team won’t let that happen. This led me to think that perhaps, he should have corked it, and his fans could have made the whole thing out to be a huge misunderstanding, and ignored the other team yelling, “CORK!”

This was good enough for the goat, but the commentator took the illogical route once again, and opted to tell the truth, which, as we see illustrated so often these days, is not a good thing to do.

Things however, seem to have a funny way of working themselves out, and in the same way that the goat with the cork failed to achieve significant results after playing possum, the commentator being played as a scapegoat for not having corked it, will probably find significance in his seclusion, and come back swinging.

I am however concerned that the other team will never allow him to forget his rule breakage, and try to taint his game by constantly reminding everyone of his past transgressions, and because of that, every point made by the political commentator will be made to appear questionable, and maybe even double-spoken.

But that’s baseball, ain’t it folks?

Me?

I’m excited and looking forward to the upcoming All South Florida World Series between the Marlins, and our other home team, the Yankees.

GO FISH!!!

(c) 2003 Luis Gonzales


TOPICS: Editorial; Free Republic
KEYWORDS: byluisgonzales; pilingon; rushbashing; rushlimbaugh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 10/24/2003 12:22:00 PM PDT by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bob J
Not very funny Luis. Stick to your day job.
2 posted on 10/24/2003 12:28:54 PM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
Last time I checked, Sosa DID serve a suspension, and of the same magnitude as other players who have done the same thing. Let's see if Rush ends up in jail or pays as big a fine for illegally abusing and purchasing prescription drugs as others have.
3 posted on 10/24/2003 12:33:34 PM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonF
Rush may need to go to jail so why don't we can ask the Kennedy's about the accomodations for vehicular homicide under the influence and leaving the scene of an accident..... (scratching his head and wondering why liberal humps are allowed to suck oxygen out of the atmoshpere)
4 posted on 10/24/2003 12:59:07 PM PDT by Dick Vomer (Liberals suck...... but it depends on what you mean by the word "suck".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RonF
"Let's see if Rush ends up in jail or pays as big a fine for illegally abusing and purchasing prescription drugs as others have."

There is NOTHING ILLEGAL about "abusing" prescription drugs. The illegality is the acquisition of PRESCRIPTION drugs without a LEGAL prescription.

In law, it is every bit as illegal for a woman to provide a percocet from her legally prescribed bottle for PMS to another person for whatever use! Same with a birth control pill or a Celebrex!

How often have you seen this prosecuted?

5 posted on 10/24/2003 1:18:57 PM PDT by lawdude (Liberalism: A failure every time it is tried!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lawdude
"You can't abuse a drug. You can only abuse yourself" --Thomas Szasz
6 posted on 10/24/2003 2:26:19 PM PDT by snopercod (I am waiting for the rebirth of wonder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lawdude
Well, if I was a bit sloppy with terminology, I'm sorry. But it seems clear from what I've heard that Rush became addicted to a drug. Now, Rush has quite a bit of money, so he could well have afforded to take some time and get treatment. But, he didn't. Instead, he repeatedly committed crimes to illegally obtain prescription drugs.

How often is it prosecuted? I have no idea. Nor do I care. It sounds like the kids in my Troop when they first join and find out that doing their share of the work isn't all that fun. "What, me? What about him?" We're not talking about other people, we're taking about Rush.

I don't listen to the man, myself, but it's my understanding that he is pretty quick to call for other people to be punished for their crimes. If so, then it's time for him to taste what he's called for for other people.
7 posted on 10/24/2003 4:25:36 PM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dick Vomer
Typical. You can count on Rush's defenders to invoke Kennedy, Clinton, and any other leftist or centrist politician or celebrity. But when the day is done, Rush will have to answer for his own actions. Trying to deflect attention from him by pointing to someone else doesn't work for kids in my Scout Troop, and it won't work for him. Last time I checked, personal responsibility was a conservative value.
8 posted on 10/24/2003 4:28:04 PM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RonF
Well, many of us of course do listen to him and the only thing the libs have been able to come up with is a couple of sentences - and not very hard hitting at that - from a show he did eight years ago! The WOD just wasn't his cause.

When the libs started screaming about his hypocrisy concerning drug abuse, I remember thinking I listen to him almost everyday and I don't remember that he was particularly outspoken about drug abuse. That's because he wasn't. If he had been, believe me it would have been played over and over on all the alphabet networks for the last couple of weeks.
9 posted on 10/24/2003 5:08:08 PM PDT by Let's Roll (And those that cried Appease! Appease! are hanged by those they tried to please!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RonF
You are right... I'm sure he'll be made to pay... just like all the others who obtain prescription narcs and abuse them. You know what's funny... there are a lot of docs that could start leaking info out on other public people. There are plenty of pushers and dealers willing to give up others to get a break on jail time.

We'll see how this all shakes down. I just think the hypocrisy on the left is fairly evident. Rush really never was down on druggies, just on government libs, feminazis, environmental commie weasels and moocher welfare scanks.... His credibility is intact on those things, I don't think he will be seen in the same light however. Actually that's the point that libs don't get.... conservatives aren't in a "one leader" cult.... so killing Rush off will just give others room to make a voice. Conservatives are driven by the principles of low taxes, limited government, Judeo-Christian morals (including attonement and forgivness) and love of country.... libs believe in ..... just the opposite.

I'm actually pulling for Rush to come back.. be ballsy and join the fray again.

I won't mention the Kennedy's or Clinton.... what with Jesse Jackson, Marion Berry, multiple Bronx judges, Danny Morales, Alcee Hastings, yadda, yadda, yadda. The problem with naming Liberal or Democratic scandals is that "ends justify the means" and "moral relativism" are the mantra.. lying is the only way to "fool" the public into voting for their ideas. So if only by deception can libs "play to the middle" they start off as liars and any other crime, graft or disreputable behavior is 'OK".

Is Rush a hypocrite... yep I guess so... but I think his real "sin" is that of pride. That old reliable fault that insures the downfall of the person that thinks he's a little bit better and more deserving than others.... The problem for Rush is going to be humility in private while keeping the bravado in public. So Rush the blow hard conservative character that is the host will have to come under control of the private person "Rush Limbaugh" that neither of us know. So just like addicts I see in the ER... I'll hope he does well and encourage the outpatient counseling.

If you think this will shut up the conservatives on the air... well just keep digging and flinging crap.... and ignore the philosophical debate ... at your own risk.

10 posted on 10/24/2003 5:43:39 PM PDT by Dick Vomer (Liberals suck...... but it depends on what you mean by the word "suck".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Let's Roll
I'm not talking about the WOSD, I'm talking about his overall attitudes towards criminals and personal responsibility.
11 posted on 10/24/2003 6:05:41 PM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dick Vomer
I have no expectation, or desire, that this will shut up anyone.
12 posted on 10/24/2003 6:07:37 PM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
Clinton defenders; "it was sex, not perjury"

Rush defenders: "it was addiction, not fraud"
13 posted on 10/25/2003 8:40:03 AM PDT by yoswif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoswif
Now, that is a fair assessment...
14 posted on 10/25/2003 12:22:39 PM PDT by dwd1 (M. h. D. (Master of Hate and Discontent))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RonF
Ron, no rational person disagrees with you.

However, Rush's fans have generally exercised commendable restraint in this comparison thing. The finger-pointing ain't happening. Bill Clinton was a coke-snorting fool, but that has precious little to do with Rush's problem. Most conservatives know that intuitively.

Right now, it's up to FL law-enforcement to put up, or shut up. If he committed a crime, charge the SOB, and arrest him. Most conservatives also have the common-sense to know that the media is going to whip Rush like a 5-dollar mule. But you know, it can't be much worse than what they do to Liza Minelli.

15 posted on 10/25/2003 10:40:36 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: iamfarouk
Rush is addicted - logic, shoulda done etc. go out the window when you are talking addiction.

I've also written the following - and thanks for giving me the chance to repeat it.

"To me the difference is: Rush got hooked legally.

The analogy is: two pedestrians are hit by a car in two separate incidents. One pedestrian was walking in the street, the other was walking on the sidewalk and the car jumped the curb and hit him."

Of course, I've heard him refer to long-haired, maggot infested - they're the ones walking in the street. And can the whining about the damage to conservatism - there wouldn't be a viable conservative movement in this country if it weren't for Rush.

18 posted on 10/27/2003 9:26:16 AM PST by Let's Roll (And those that cried Appease! Appease! are hanged by those they tried to please!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: iamfarouk
Does the work "viable" mean anything to you?

20 posted on 10/27/2003 10:21:29 AM PST by Let's Roll (And those that cried Appease! Appease! are hanged by those they tried to please!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson