Posted on 10/15/2016 1:16:00 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
No NO NO. this isn’t suppose to be happening. Republicans are suppose to be “nice guys” and take the high road. Republicans are suppose to lay down and let the democrats say and do anything and be happy they still get invited to the WH correspondents dinner and lavish cocktail parties at Anna Wintor’s apartment.
Trump also needs to get with Congress and mandate some Anti-Virus procedures for all elections that include federal candidates. Get rid of motor-voter, like the SS Death Index with all state and county election boards, ditto with auto license bureaus to avoid voting in 2 places. We need to go back to paper ballots and add in indelible ink on the thumb or hand to avoid multiple votes. Non-politician citizens who even REGISTER are to be tossed out of the country FOFEVER, including tourist purposes. This voter fraud $hit has to stop!!!
I`m not completely sure what the article means by `supression of votes`, but I think they might by talking about trying to diminish voter enthusiasm for Hillary among her supporters so that many may decide to just not bother to vote. The thinking may be that a certain percentage of hardcore Dems will never be persuaded to vote for Trump, but may be persuaded to vote third party, or not at all.
anti-FRAUD, not Anti-Virus.
“”Drugs, drugs, and more drugs administered by the world’s best Dr. Feelgoods””
That’s what everyone keeps saying but I can’t believe it. Drugs would not allow her to look the best she’s looked in 20 years NOR would it take 50# off her hips, NOR give her a good looking hairdo for a change! AND allow her to speak without stuttering/stammering without a ton of “you knows”.... I don’t know the answer but I don’t buy the drug route. Whatever it is - we should all be like the diner in “When Harry Met Sally” - “I want what she’s having!”
Looks like some folks focused on the suppressing of votes w/o understanding that de-energizing her base will have the natural effect of suppressing voters who lean Dem but have no reason to be excited.
De-energizing her base will naturally “suppress” a number of their votes. Don’t read something that isn’t there into it.
So, now fighting back is a bad thing. I suppose from the MSM’s perspective that is true. They’ve never had a republican fight back before.
Trump gets through this debate, and then he starts dropping bombs. He has no more MSM ambushes to answer to.
Probably because they don't know all the code words, one of those code words being "suppression" which usually connotes an illegal activity.
the attacks on the Clintons are also aimed at the "suppression of votes" from millennial women, African-Americans and the "idealistic Bernie Sanders supporter.""Principally, we're trying to drive them to a third party or just have them not vote," the source said.
He could have skipped the phrase altogether, and made the point. Non-issue negatives against the opponent are generically designed to drive people to other candidates, or to stay home.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.