Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Representative Lisa Subeck Circulates Bill Banning Semiautomatic Weapons
Office of Rep. Lisa Subeck ^ | November 4, 2015

Posted on 11/05/2015 8:37:55 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Our nation has watched as community after community has had to confront the tragedies that occur when mentally ill and/or evil people take advantage of "gun free" zones and kill large numbers of defenseless people quickly while law enforcement endangers the rest of us racing to the scene.

It is long past time to end this madness. We have 30+ years of experience and thousands of dead and wounded to attest to the stupidity of this idea. This idiotic notion must be abandoned. Common sense and a blood drenched history has shown "gun free" zones to be nothing more than an invitation to criminals. Armed law abiding citizens on-scene are the single most effective tool at ending or significantly reducing this bloodshed. Stop aiding and abetting murderers.

21 posted on 11/05/2015 9:02:37 PM PST by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; All
Fastest shooter EVER, Jerry Miculek- World record 8 shots in 1 second & 12 shot reload! HD

With a revolver, which is not gas operated, and thus NOT considered a semi-automatic weapon.

https://youtu.be/WzHG-ibZaKM

22 posted on 11/05/2015 9:04:14 PM PST by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Well our deer population has been taken care of so maybe the 2nd Amendment is no longer needed.


23 posted on 11/05/2015 9:06:25 PM PST by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
State Reps. Chris Taylor, D-Madison, Terese Berceau, D-Madison, and Melissa Sargent, D-Madison, joined Subeck

More names for your lists.

24 posted on 11/05/2015 9:07:59 PM PST by Noumenon (Resistance. Restoration. Retribution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

She hasnt really thought hard why someone would need a semiautomatic gun. She could just ask a police officer for several reasons. Rrasons that also apply to regular folks in the same world the cops aremin.

Obviously never been gang raped, or attacked by a group of thugs. Or attacked by one person on drugs.

Cant even talk to these absolute morons.


25 posted on 11/05/2015 9:11:11 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chatham

Dangerous people make up quite a lot of the democrat voter base.


26 posted on 11/05/2015 9:11:58 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I think she has more pressing health issues than guns

27 posted on 11/05/2015 9:14:24 PM PST by BookmanTheJanitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
You can TRY doing that, but guess what!!! WE have a second amendment that says we can have guns, and if you don't like it, come around sometime, ammo is very expensive right now and nobody is going to waste it on a warning shot....come on hot shot, lets see your guts on this one!!!
28 posted on 11/05/2015 9:19:29 PM PST by HarleyLady27 (I have such happy days, and hope you do too!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch
To be a Democrat one has to have an IQ within a specific rangeI didn't think there was a lower bound, just an upper one - like 70
29 posted on 11/05/2015 9:19:41 PM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yeah, what a stupid twit that one is.


30 posted on 11/05/2015 9:20:37 PM PST by Delta 21 (Patiently waiting for the jack booted kick at my door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
 photo gun-free-zones.jpg
31 posted on 11/05/2015 9:22:22 PM PST by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

The 2A wasn’t intended to be contingent on future gun crime statistics or emotions. Our founding fathers would be appalled at how we deal with so called gun crime.


32 posted on 11/05/2015 9:23:19 PM PST by umgud (v)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon

33 posted on 11/05/2015 9:25:17 PM PST by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Right you are; it was one of those.

Mail coming your way in a few minutes...


34 posted on 11/05/2015 10:09:47 PM PST by Carriage Hill ( The cheddar cheese slid off my cracker on 11/6/12.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BobL

That democrat most definitely would not seize our guns, they would hire other people, and sanction them having arms to do that...


35 posted on 11/05/2015 10:19:50 PM PST by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"I can conceive of no legitimate reason that any citizen should need to own or use a semiautomatic assault weapon," said Rep. Subeck.

Subeck needs to get her conceiver fixed. or at least learn how to operate it.

o There are no semiautomatic assault weapons. To come under the "assault" classification, it must be fully automatic, Her conceiver tells her a lie.

o The lawful reason that any citizen may own a semiautomatic firearm is that, so far, there is no prohibition to own and bear any arm that is manually loaded or self (= auto) loaded. That ownership is Constitutionally protected, and is enough reason for a citizen to own, bear, and use it in protecting the life and property of oneself and others falling under his care.

o Any attempt to infringe this basic right is unconstitutional, an act to flout the basic guarantees for which the Constitution of Anerican government is designed.

o Any attempt to infringe this right is a criminal act. The corollary that its implementation gives superior advantage to the criminal unlawfully bearing and using such an instrument to deprive a law-abiding citizen of life, liberty, and/or the pursuit of happiness. This makes the legislator an advocate for enabling criminal behavior rather than a representative of the law-abiding citizens he/she is representing.

o Any legislator proposing such laws that aid and abet the criminal should be impeached and removed from office forthwith.

36 posted on 11/05/2015 11:43:20 PM PST by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Axenolith

Or, like Australia, not ‘seize’ or ‘take’ your guns, but make them virtually USELESS for self-defense, as you’d face ten times as much jail time as your attacker for still having them.

At that point they offer a “no-questions-ask” buy-back and the vast majority of people simply want to forget that they were ever permitted to own them in the first place.

So, as Hillary states, it’s not that the government there took your guns, it’s that they left you with no option to hand them in yourself.


37 posted on 11/06/2015 3:44:21 AM PST by BobL ( (REPUBLICANS - Fight for the WHITE VOTE...and you will win (see my 'profile' page))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: umgud

People like the fat ugly woman who introduced this (Why are so many liberal woman ugly?) are the enemy. In fact they’re more dangerous to us in the USA than ISIS. The goal of these people is to (and will without a moment’s qualm of conscience) strip you of your God given rights, and enslave you to their god - government. My personal opinion is that they should be added to Koko’s list (for you savoyards)


38 posted on 11/06/2015 4:15:21 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Ya. Good luck with that you psycho-hose-beast Subeck.
She needs to be publicly ridiculed, often, with great emphasis on her lack of knowledge of the 2nd Ammendment.


39 posted on 11/06/2015 4:16:13 AM PST by BigpapaBo (If it don't kill you it'll make you _________!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
A bill?
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

WISCONSIN CONSTITUTION
ARTICLE I, Section 25

Right to keep and bear arms. Section 25. [As created Nov. 1998] The people have the right to keep and bear arms for security, defense, hunting, recreation or any other lawful purpose. [1995 J.R. 27, 1997 J.R. 21, vote November 1998]

They better step up their game!

40 posted on 11/06/2015 5:51:53 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson