Posted on 02/04/2010 2:25:23 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
He has never been a conservative and always wants to give Barry Sotero Dunham the benefit of the doubt.
The Right should shun him, he's not on our side.
That is an untrue statement in accordance with the law in force in August of 1961.
Obama’s mother was not old enough to pass on US citizenship if Obama was born outside the US. If Obama wasn’t born on Hawaiian soil then he’s not even a US citizen, period. Much less a natural born US citizen, as required by the Constitution.
Please look at http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/red-flags-in-hawaii-2/ and then tell me what you think is going on in Hawaii right now.
So his alleged father’s not being an American citizen isn’t a stumbling block for you?
The DOH has already confirmed that the FActcheck and FTS COLB’s are forgeries. See http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/red-flags-in-hawaii-2/
And the certificate number and filing dates for the COLB he forged from don’t even work together. He had to have forged one or the other, because the Nordyke certificates, which were filed by the DOH on the 11th, have an earlier number than the Factcheck COLB, which supposedly came in 3 days earlier. The DOH gives the birth certificates their certificate numbers at the same time they file the certificates.
So we have the DOH’s own admission as well as the evidence of the nonsequential serial numbers that prove that both Factcheck and Fight the Smears COLB’s are forgeries.
There’s much, much more at the blog I linked.
An honest man would be **HONORED** to promptly prove in every way they were a natural born citizen and eligible to be president and Commander in Chief.
What does Obama’s behavior have to say about his honesty?
What does Obama’s behavior have to say about those who defend him.
Finally,...I see that the Dems are bringing this issue up themselves. Obama, himself, mentioned his citizenship at the Prayer Meeting as well as Kos, and Mother Jones.
So...Bill...Did you get a call from a DNC operative telling you that you too should mention Obama’s eligibility?
If it was an illegitimate birth, the birth couldn’t have been published in the paper. And when his parents married the original birth certificate would have been sealed and a new one made to show that he was legitimate. That process is called legitimation.
It’s not illegitimacy that he’s hiding.
I am not a birther, but, I sure do like the degree of discomfort it causes the Zero. He could make it all go away, but, instead he protests too much(which I think is because by training he is a mobster not a politician). I wouldn’t be surprised if he threatens to resign his office before the Nov. 2010 elections.
You’re absolutely right on the mobster bit. See http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com and follow the link at the end of the post to see how it applies to the eligibility issue.
Without fail, someone always comes at me with the same reams of information. I’ve heard all of this before. It hasn’t gained traction, and likely won’t gain traction. My original statement stands.
I am quite sure Obama’s hiding something (I’m not sure what) ... but there isn’t enough to convince the public of anything, and the issue is doing more harm than good. Its counterproductive, and likely a waste of time. It is entirely possible that Obama is withholding information to keep the conspiracy wheels turning in an effort to discredit the right.
SnakeDoc
So far, about 1 year into his term, we have two data points: his assurance that he complies with this important clause and his spending over a million dollars on lawyers tasked with opposing and suppressing any attempt to pry a single credible document that might shed light on this issue.
I do not doubt that BHO was born in Hawaii. I understand that some have postulated he was born elsewhere. But that is not the end of the issue. It also pivots on what citizenship status he had at his birth.
The father he claims to have was not a US citizen at the time. His mother was not old enough to convey citizenship. If these two facts are in error, then I welcome a credible correction.
This issue is solved if he could show that his biological father was a US citizen at the time of his birth. That would demand that there are facts yet to be revealed. Could this explain the role of “Frank” in his life?
Lest anyone think this is a matter of race, it cannot be. What is “race” when a person can decide to be “black” some years after their birth? It is clearly not a genetic
determination. It is ideological. And for this American, that is exactly the issue.
Bill Clinton was given the title by liberals as the First Black President. Since BHO’s mother was Caucasian and the father he claims was black, then by the dictionary BHO is mulatto. But in his autobiography, BHO tells us that he decided to be “black”. I would appreciate that he be honest with us and tell us all that means.
I can understand and accept a president with a dark skin. I just cannot understand nor accept a president with a red ideology, wherever he was born and whoever his parents really were.
ever have to fill out a w-9 form? how about work for the govt? either way you must provide ID... and by that I don’t mean your drivers license. they want a passport or birth certificate.
McCain was forced to provide his info... and it was hillarys guy, Philip Berg, that started the push for 0bama’s eligibility requirements
last I checked... it is the LAW to provide the documentation. no amount of ridicule will diminish something so basic
why should this guy be above the law?
Did you look at the site?
When a guy doesn’t present a birth certificate after having forced his opponent to present a birth certificate—for a job that requires a birth certificate...something is really fubar.
It didn't seem to bother the gentleman with the gavel.
Or this notable judge facing the camera.
In fact, only to birthers is this even a "stumbling block." It certain doesn't seem to be a stumbling block with the courts where 64 (and counting) birther cases have been unceremoniously tossed out.
For a list of other things that don’t seem to be a stumbling block to people entrusted to take care of such things, see http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/red-flags-in-hawaii-2/
I guess that means it shouldn’t matter to anybody?
The post at http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com explains why this is a law enforcement issue and why anybody who believes America should be a lawful nation should care about this issue.
“Unless someone can prove that Obama’s mother was not American born (nobody has argued that), the case is closed: Obama is a ntural born citizen and legally qualified to be president. Whoever thought up this “birther” nonsense?”
You do not know what you are talking about. Read the Constitution on eligibility at the time that Obuma was born.
Find out where he was born (big question). then opine about nonsense.
Keep in mind that this whole thing started when his paternal grandmother stated that she attended his birth in Kenya (or whereever). The reponse by Obuma was to produce a phony Hawaiian crtificate on the internet. The probe into why a phony was necessary brounght our his legal team to block any attempts at getting to his records, including school records, and also sending Rohme Emanual, COS, to Kenya (or whereever) to get them to seal his records overthere.
so the question is why the needless controversy?
O’reilly always is/was/has been a Conservative of Convenience.
If there are Birth announcements, then there is a friggin long form.
“FREE THE LONG FORM!”
Then explain dual citizenship and why a dual allegiance just might be a problem for the head of our military.
What's tragic is that those opinion percentages should all be at 100%, along with the number of conservatives NOT watching Bull O'Really.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.