It's Time:Hillary Pres./announce. pool thread

22 Sept. 2003 | Finalapproach29er

[Mustang]

Oh, please, hope she runs. Let her meet the same fate of "Mrs. Iselin."

Mustang sends from "Malpaso News"

[MEG33]

So true!

[exit82]

If she loses as VP, I don't think she would be permanently tarnished. Nothing tarnishes the Clintons in our society.

Hillary believes she has a date with destiny. She is amassing the power, politically and economically, to fulfill that date.

She is perceived as the champion of women's rights and feminism, yet she has acted the doormat to an unfaithful husband for 25 years. Still, the female masses love her, even though she is the antithesis to what they believe a strong woman should be.

As we have seen from the fronthand Freeper reports from her booksignings, she commands the loyalty of a huge number of women. She is not to be underestimated.

[MEG33]

They weep at the thought they are going to meet her highness.Hillary inspires equal numbers who despise her and believe her to be the possible author of national ruin.They say ridicule is a deadly weapon and it can be used with glee against Hillary.

[bootyist-monk]

The day after Wesley Rodham Clark dies from "mysterious" circumstances.

[Johnbalaya]

Assuming that all she wants to do is become president of the US, and it's a given that she'll be trounced in the re-election for senate in 2006, then yes, 2004 is her best bet. Pushing Clark onto the scene is a way to propagandize the idea that Democrats are strong militarily. The other Democrats can be used to energize the Democrat base by bashing bush, and she can run with Clark as a moderating influence who looks strong on defense with a General in her hip pocket in order to get the independents on her side.

If her numbers in NY are weak for a 2006 re-election bid in the senate, then she'll run for President. If they're strong, I think she'll take a VP position to put a stamp into the public's mind that she is Executive branch material, and she can dance around her senatorial campaign promise of not running for president because she'll be "called" to serve as a VP candidate. So even if she loses with whoever calls her up to be VP, she gets re-elected into the senate 2 yrs later and keeps her in the public eye. This will ensure her return as a presidential candidate in 2008.

[nopardons]

I may make typos ( I am, unfortunately the QUEEN OF TYPOS on FR ), make spelling errors ( I'm dyslexic, but that doesn't mean I'm stupid, kiddo ),and my grammar is perfect! I've been politically aware / active, probably longer than your parents have been alive.That's far MORE important than an error here or there, in spelling.

W's re-elect numbers, depending upon the source, are at 48%, 52 % and higher. It is still far too early for polls to be any measure of much of anything at all.

The Clintons are NOT at the " apex " of their power, though you might assume so.

Dean and Sharpton, for two, won't roll over and play dead for them.

I don't care what your IQ is. You don't know what mine is and it doesn't matter, but mine is up there too ! What matters, is that I know what I'm talking about; you don't have a clue. And personal " cheap shots " are part of FR and because I didn't personally attack you, just posted a slight jibe, I'm in the clear. And, newbie, if you can't take the heat, stay out of the fray. ;^)

[Concerned]

NOPARDONS RESPONDED TO EXIT82: "She won't take V.P. and I doubt that Dean or LIEberman would take her on."

NOPARDONS ADDED: "If, hypothetically, your scenario is true and the Dems lose, as they SHALL, she is perminently tarnished ! Ferraro was the " first woman V.P. candidate, so even though she lost, she has pride of first. And, that didn't help her; neither would it help Hil."

I can just see Hillary being "chosen" by Clark to be VP. (That way she can "run" without running for President, therefore not violating her "promise" not to run for PRESIDENT in 2004.)

Then, IF, by some miracle, they were to win (or even LOOK like they COULD or MIGHT win), Clark would suddenly commit Arkanside and Hillary would get the sympathy vote and become President.

[Finalapproach29er]

I agree. Her once,smooth and shining skin is getting a little leathery. Americans can be quite superficial (see:swooning soccer mom's). The sand is running through her hour glass as we speak.

[nopardons]

To fantastical. LOL

[Finalapproach29er]

Good post. She does have a God complex.

[nopardons]

And there are many MORE , even Dem women, who loathe her.

Losing to W, would tarnish her. Sorry, but even as the V.P. candidate ( and that's supposing that Clark would pick and supposing that Clark will beat out Dean, or one of the other dwarves ),most of the talking heads would be calling her a " loser ".

Clark won't be the front runner long, BTW.

[zarf]

Hillary doesn't have a chance. No one will energize the Republican base like the lying witch.

Dean has a better chance to win.

[Finalapproach29er]

Like Jim McDougal not getting his medicine in prison. His qoute about the Clintons is perfect: "the Clintons are like a tornado blowing through and leaving a wake of destruction". Poor Jim learned too late.

[Finalapproach29er]

My father is no longer alive. He died in July.

[Squantos]

I agree with you to a point. She is waiting like a Vulture for GW to goof anything up. He stumbles she's in the race.....to lose IMHO. The volitile world as it appears today ? Who can guess what's gonna happen next after the 9-11 atrocity.

Stay Safe FRiend !

[nopardons]

Sorry to hear that; however, unless you were a child of quite aged parents, what I said is true and was NO " slur " on your parents.

[nopardons]

Yes, she's a vulture, an Harpy, and in for the kill, but ONLY if she is assured of victory.

President Bush would have to do something catastrophic, for her to enter the '04 race.

[Diddle E. Squat]

10/31 would be most appropriate.

Well that, or 5/1.

[MEG33]

Or 4/1.....;)