Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ten Comandmints
WRAL News | wwalk841

Posted on 08/26/2003 7:55:01 AM PDT by wwalk

In the constitution it says we have freedom to worship whatever we want, that doesn't hold true in Alabama. I support Judge Moore who shoudn't take the monument down. I want your oppinion


TOPICS: Religion
KEYWORDS: allyouropinion; arebelongtous; attackofthehampsters; hahaha; howareyougentlemen; ineedtobeoverlorded; itsyou; makeyourtime; mintz; movezig; movezigforjustice; nochancetosurvive; setupusthebomb; somebody; tensuggestions; thoushaltnotmisspell; wegetspellcheck; what; whatwasthat; whatyousay; yesiamatroll; zot; zotme
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

1 posted on 08/26/2003 7:55:02 AM PDT by wwalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wwalk; meowmeow; Constitution Day; 4mycountry; Poohbah; Grampa Dave; an amused spectator; ...
You registered about 5 months ago, and this is your first and only post? In all that time you couldn't lurn to spel?
2 posted on 08/26/2003 8:11:32 AM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember; meowmeow; Constitution Day; 4mycountry; Poohbah; Grampa Dave; an amused spectator; ...
I suspect we have a sleeper troll here. What is your oppinnion?
3 posted on 08/26/2003 8:12:49 AM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wwalk
I prefer Altoids instead of Comandmints.
4 posted on 08/26/2003 8:12:49 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember
Since he/she is listing WRAL News, which is my local TV station, let's wait and see what kind of response we get.

Maybe they've just been lurking till now?

5 posted on 08/26/2003 8:14:16 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember; hobbes1
Hey hobbes, care to explain it for the newbie....
6 posted on 08/26/2003 8:16:29 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (There they go again....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wwalk
If I've said it once, I'll say it again, FR NEEDS A SPELL CHECKER!!
7 posted on 08/26/2003 8:17:35 AM PDT by 4mycountry (You say I'm a brat like it's a bad thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember
I suspect we have a sleeper troll here. What is your oppinnion?


8 posted on 08/26/2003 8:17:49 AM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident; VRWCmember
Well he does seem to have some series hugh speling problemz.
9 posted on 08/26/2003 8:20:46 AM PDT by hobbes1 ( Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wwalk; hobbes1
Here's some smarter people than I and what they would say of it. Courtesy of hobbes1

"....Thomas Jefferson was neither the author of nor a coauthor of the First Amendment. He cannot be considered as a source of legal authority on this subject.

The Court, if it had wished to rely upon Jefferson to determine the true and original intent of the First Amendment, could have served themselves and the American people well by referring to Jefferson's admonition to Judge William Johnson regarding the determination of the original intent of a statute or a constitution: `On every question of construction, carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed.' (Thomas Jefferson, Memoir, Correspondence, and Miscellanies, From the Papers of Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Randolph, editor [Boston: Gray and Bowen, 1830, Vol. IV., p. 373,] to Judge William Johnson on June 12, 1823).

Justice Joseph Story, considered the Father of American Jurisprudence, stated in his Commentaries on the Constitution: `The real object of the [First A]mendment was not to countenance, much less to advance Mohometanism [sp], or Judaism, or infidelity by prostrating Christianity; but to exclude all rivalry among Christian sects and to prevent any national ecclesiastical establishment which should give to a hierarchy [a denominational council] the exclusive patronage of the national government. (Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States [Boston; Hilliard, Gray and Company, 1833], p. 728, par. 1871.)

Chief Justice William Rehnquist made an extensive study of the history of the First Amendment. In his dissent in Wallace v. Jaffree (472 U.S. 38, 48, n. 30 [1984],) he stated: `There is simply no historical foundation for the proposition that the Framers intended to build the `wall of separation' that was constitutionalized in Everson. . . . But the greatest injury of the `wall' notion is its mischievous diversion of judges from the actual intentions of the drafters of the Bill of Rights. . . . [N]o amount of repetition of historical errors in judicial opinions can make the errors true. The `wall of separation between church and state' is a metaphor based on bad history. . . . It should be frankly and explicitly abandoned. . . . Our perception has been clouded not by the Constitution but by the mists of an unnecessary metaphor. It would come as much of a shock to those who drafted the Bill of Rights, as it will to a large number of thoughtful Americans today, to learn that the Constitution, as construed by the majority, prohibits the Alabama Legislature from endorsing prayer. George Washington himself, at the request of the very Congress which passed the Bill of Rights, proclaimed a day of public thanksgiving and prayer, to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many and signal favors of Almighty God. History must judge whether it was the Father of his Country in 1789, or a majority of the Court today, which has strayed from the meaning of the Establishment Clause.'
10 posted on 08/26/2003 8:21:10 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (There they go again....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
Unless he reeds better than he spels, posting that thoughtful essay was a waste of time.
11 posted on 08/26/2003 8:24:08 AM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
This is series and hugh!
12 posted on 08/26/2003 8:25:21 AM PDT by MotleyGirl70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
I think wwalk may be a psuedonym for Molly Ivins. She's probably trolling for quotes to use against FReepers. Something about the spelling of "Comandmints" just made me think that this is Molly posting.
13 posted on 08/26/2003 8:26:16 AM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

I dunno, lemme check...

14 posted on 08/26/2003 8:28:38 AM PDT by Zavien Doombringer (I seem to be the source of gravity, everything seems to fall on me....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day

15 posted on 08/26/2003 8:29:08 AM PDT by MotleyGirl70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day; aculeus; general_re; BlueLancer; Poohbah; hellinahandcart; Catspaw

... brought down by Moses from the Wrigley Building ...

16 posted on 08/26/2003 8:31:06 AM PDT by dighton (NLC™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember
Unless he reeds better than he spels, posting that thoughtful essay was a waste of time.

Thatt's ok, I jest kut and paested ittt.

17 posted on 08/26/2003 8:35:55 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (This is hughly series, please be spefic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dighton
And from the upper deck at Wrigley Field....
 

alt
alt
alt alt alt
alt alt alt alt alt alt
alt alt Address & Phone:
1060 West Addison
Chicago, IL 60613-4397
773-404-CUBS

Distances from plate:
Left field - 355 feet
Left-center - 368 feet
Center field - 400 feet
Right-center - 368 feet
Right field - 353 feet
Plate screen - 60.5 feet

Height of wall:
Bleachers - 11.5 feet
In corners - 15.0 feet
alt alt
alt alt alt
alt
Wrigley Field, which was built in 1914, is playing host to Major League Baseball for the 90th season in 2003.

18 posted on 08/26/2003 8:37:37 AM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
Thatt's ok, I jest kut and paested ittt.

I notised the lak of formating from the orijinel.

19 posted on 08/26/2003 8:37:57 AM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember
I wuz bein lazey.
20 posted on 08/26/2003 8:39:39 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (This is hughly series, please be spefic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson