Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

There is no provision in the Constitution and no controlling American case law to support a contention that the citizenship of one’s parents governs the eligibility of U.S. citizens born within the United States to be President.
EveryCSReport.com ^ | December 03, 2023 | Unknown

Posted on 12/03/2023 11:31:10 AM PST by 4Runner

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last
To: batazoid
I think you are in large part arguing with people who don't know what to think until a court tells them.

Too many people give too much deference to the "courts."

The Courts got steered wrong by William Rawle, and they have never recovered from the damage.

81 posted on 12/03/2023 4:02:37 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

The offspring born within the jurisdiction of an illegal alien mother is a naturalized U.S. citizen at birth, but not an Art. II, §1, Cl. 5 natural born citizen.


82 posted on 12/03/2023 4:10:27 PM PST by batazoid (Plainclothes cop at Capital during Jan 6 riot...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

I agree. It’s not rocket science. We elect our commander-in-chief. Art. II, §1, Cl. 5 natural born citizenship clause is the only Presidential requirement that directly addresses this point.


83 posted on 12/03/2023 4:16:47 PM PST by batazoid (Plainclothes cop at Capital during Jan 6 riot...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: 4Runner

Needs to be examined in light of what it meant when written by the Founders.

Citizen and Natural Born Citizen and Naturalized Citizen are different animals.


84 posted on 12/03/2023 4:17:16 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion (I didn't come here to guide lambs, but to awaken lions - 🦅MAGADONIAN⚔️)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

Re: 81 - to me, this really is a function of the Legislative branch doing less and less of what it did in the past - legislate. That vacuum invites the Executive and Judiciary (depending on judicial philosophy) to become more engaged.

Issues like Chevron deference would not be the issues they are if the Legislative branch made modifications to laws.

I don’t see the Congress acting different until one party or the other gains more of a majority.


85 posted on 12/03/2023 4:50:49 PM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: nagant
Born-in-the-U.S. children of Ambassadors NON-CITIZENS are not subject to American jurisdiction, and are not U.S. citizens.

FTFY

86 posted on 12/03/2023 5:04:36 PM PST by Don W (When blacks riot, neighborhoods and cities burn. When whites riot, nations and continents burn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

Jindal, and 0bama, and McCain are all technically not eligible by the wording of the constitution, but the most basic fundamental law of the land is no longer in effect for some reason. Just look at the “quick trials” of the J-6 folks...


87 posted on 12/03/2023 5:13:34 PM PST by Don W (When blacks riot, neighborhoods and cities burn. When whites riot, nations and continents burn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: batazoid
The offspring born within the jurisdiction of an illegal alien mother is a naturalized U.S. citizen at birth

No, because the clause "AND SUBJECT TO THE LAWS THEREOF" is NOT in effect.

An illegal alien is not subject to the laws of the USA, but of their home country. The word jurisdiction evidently means something different to you.

88 posted on 12/03/2023 5:28:08 PM PST by Don W (When blacks riot, neighborhoods and cities burn. When whites riot, nations and continents burn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: odawg

No.

It was your citation, but you need to go back and read it again, without the filter of what you want it to say.

They were silent on the topic of persons born within the United States. They did want to make it clear that if you were traveling or stationed abroad, your children would still be US “natural born citizens”. So it could be taken as evidence that the first congress, the guys who either wrote or were involved in ratifying the Constitution took a broad view of who should be a “natural born citizen”.

Claiming that your sources say something they don’t is a good way to make sure that this NBC convo remains a topic for grumpy old farts in smokey back rooms.


89 posted on 12/03/2023 5:59:52 PM PST by absalom01 (You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Don W

“An illegal alien is not subject to the laws of the USA”

Dead wrong. SCOTUS cleared that up in 1898.


90 posted on 12/03/2023 6:04:12 PM PST by absalom01 (You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco
Neither of Bobby Jindal's parents were citizens when he was born in the United States. How was he allowed to do so under your interpretation?

Allowed to do what? Jindal never ran for President.

-PJ

91 posted on 12/03/2023 6:27:17 PM PST by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: 4Runner
The simplest definition of a natural born citizen, using language already found in the Constitution, is this:

A natural born citizen is the Posterity of We the People.

-PJ

92 posted on 12/03/2023 6:31:27 PM PST by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nagant
Born-in-the-U.S. children of Ambassadors are not subject to American jurisdiction, and are not U.S. citizens.

Neither are the children of foreigners. If their home country issued a warrant for their return, they're gone. If their home country recalled their parents to draft them to fight at war against the United States, they're gone.

93 posted on 12/03/2023 7:00:42 PM PST by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco
You don’t think for one second that if the Democrats could have prevented Bobby Jindal, Nimarata Nikki Randhawa, Vivek Ramaswami from running for president based on their and yours interpretation of “Natural Born Citizen”, wouldn’t have done so?

Democrats? The Left want to remove the Natural Born Citizen requirement in their attempt to destroy the Weimar States of America.

They've already violated it twice; once with Obama and the second time with Kamala Harris.

94 posted on 12/03/2023 7:02:44 PM PST by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: absalom01

“They did want to make it clear that if you were traveling or stationed abroad, your children would still be US “natural born citizens”.”

True, natural born citizens, but only if they were born of citizen parents, which you refuse to acknowledge. Why would they specify, of citizen parents? They already discussed aliens becoming citizens. They did not mention aliens becoming natural born citizens. The children of naturalized citizens would indeed be natural born citizens. Did you, by the way, just happened to slip across the border?

Let me ask you a question. Why is it that, long before this was ever a controversy, people were taught that natural born meant born of citizen parents. I was taught that in American history when I had American history in the 11th grade. Later on, in the 70s, when I went to college, I remember the old professor explaining what a natural born citizen was. He had a doctorate in history. My mother’s geneneration was taught that, she told me, and her mother’s also. Why did all these millions of people and all these highly educated people have it so wrong for so long.?


95 posted on 12/03/2023 7:06:56 PM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: batazoid


"in our democracy"


In case you didn't know...
WE ARE NOT A DEMOCRACY....
We are a Constitutional Republic.

(well, we were, and are supposed to be)
96 posted on 12/03/2023 8:47:32 PM PST by Bikkuri (I am proud to be a PureBlood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Bikkuri

In our Constitutional Republic, all citizens have consented to be governed...


97 posted on 12/04/2023 6:11:16 AM PST by batazoid (Plainclothes cop at Capital during Jan 6 riot...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Don W

Sorry. Illegal aliens present within the jurisdiction ARE subject to its laws thereof.


98 posted on 12/04/2023 6:19:01 AM PST by batazoid (Plainclothes cop at Capital during Jan 6 riot...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

I was 7 years old in Ramstein in 64 when my sister was born. I have always recalled the teacher telling us that she was eligible to become President. That was a big deal that every american can grow up to be president..
Its not worth much but its stuck with me all my life


99 posted on 12/04/2023 6:35:58 AM PST by winodog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: winodog

I agree. I will say, I was surprised to find that out. I was adamant that it was not a real thing...but I found it hard to understand how it is. I always thought military bases overseas were US soil, but think that is only embassies.


100 posted on 12/04/2023 9:19:40 AM PST by rlmorel ("The stigma for being wrong is gone, as long as you're wrong for the right side." (Clarice Feldman))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson