Posted on 03/08/2023 11:54:30 AM PST by Red Badger
Or corn cobs...............😏
Invest in corn cobs...............😳
How did they get there?...............
And then after reading all that the verrrry bottom of the article has a direct statement from a paper industry consortium group that expressly states in no uncertain terms that this chemical is not used in the manufacture of any toilet paper or tissue sold in the US. So either the author of the article got the lab results wrong or the industry partner is lying.
Frankly, the statement was pretty convincing. I think we need to reserve judgement here until some additional evidence shows this chemical wasn’t detected erroneously.
Since the two sides literally contradicted each other 100% we can’t draw anything meaningful from this article at all without additional 3rd party testing to corroborate.
I have been in paper mills, and they use millions of gallons of water.
It was probably in the water...........
Ever notice that McD’s uses recycled paper for their napkins. Why are they colored brown?
Just don’t use the 3 leafed plants.
High paid panic peddlers.
Leaves of three, leave it be..........
They discuss how the study includes PFOA, which is a PFAS and is widely found in the environment and the samples studies were close to or below the limit of detection. Also, they claim no PFAS are used in the production of toilet paper or tissue products in the US.
Here is the statement for brevity:
““PFAS (including 6:2 diPAP) is not used in the manufacture of toilet paper, or in the production of other tissue products in the United States.
“The University of Florida study examines concentration information in toilet paper for PFAS including PFOA, the most studied PFAS. However, the study fails to acknowledge that PFOA is widespread in the environment. In the study, toilet paper samples tested were close to or below the limit of detection, consistent with PFOA levels found in the environment and not attributable to the manufacturing process.”
So yeah, they state they don’t use them in the manufacture or production thereof, but they also state that it is inevitable that at least PFOA will show up in nearly undectable levels as a matter of course since it is throughout the environment (i.e. they do not intentionally use PFOA).
So basically, the industry expert cited is clarifying that the study doesn’t really reach the level of sensationalism that the article or study suggest.
Sherrell Crow said just to use one square ...
yeah, that’s her.............Don’t shake hands with her...............
japanese toilets..i think south park just did a show on them
Those things are great! My first exposure to one was in a Taipei hotel. A downside is that you need an outlet next to the toilet or run an extension cord across the bathroom to run it.
Have a cheap Japanes bidet toilet. Civilized and healthful.
Got a speeding ticket once in South Park CO.
PFAs are traceable because with modern chemical analysis you can find most anything in water and products.
Whether any of this is harmful is pure guesswork and proven by no scientific stuudies.
If they start looking at all of the potentially harmful chemicals in red wine, noone would ever drink it.
For most, the solution to the problem is don’t drink toilet water
Or eat the Yellow snow.....................
Hahahaha absolutely one of my favorite movies!
Hey! What’s my dog gonna do? He LOVES toilet water! It’s more flavorful to him...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.