Posted on 12/17/2021 10:54:56 AM PST by ransomnote
Is anyone even bothering to research these adverse events to see which ones ARE connected with the vaxx? It seems to me that all I see are people disregarding the reports wholesale.
Straw man. I don't insist there's no relationship but I want to see evidence.
Can someone show there's a higher rate of blindness in the vaccinated?
Theexpose.uk, and you, know not all reported blindness is due to the vaccine. In fact, none of it may be - we don't have the data to know.
Yet, in an attempt to frightening and sensationalize, they say it was all due to the vaccine.
And you're twisting yourself into knots trying to defend their mendacity.
Did you get a chance to go to ant if the links I posted?
Ophthalmic issues are occurring post-vaxxing.
...any of...
Semimojo: straw man. I don't insist there's no relationship, but I want to see evidence.
ransomnote: Then you need a translator to help us understand that when you claim the Expose is lying and I'm posting lies, what you really mean is that you want to see evidence.
Semimojo: Can someone show there's a higher rate of blindness in the vaccinated?
ransomnote: Check the thread I posted at the bottom of this post.
You ignore the extensive proof it's killing people in unprecedented numbers, I'm certain it's a waste of my time for me to post more proof you'll ignore, but I posted it for others.
Your fixation on parsing text in order to protect the 'good reputation of vaccines' when 10 year olds are having heart attacks and athletes are dropping dead in unprecedented numbers is not a good look.
Semimojo: Theexpose.uk, and you, know not all reported blindness is due to the vaccine. In fact, none of it may be - we don't have the data to know.
ransomnote: The Expose knows, as I do, that a general statement does not rule out all exceptions. We have ample data to be well versed in the deaths/debilitating injuries and you pretend we dont as if the 'vaccines' are a new novelty and we must wait for more data, more proof.
How much proof is enough? NEVER ENOUGH in your book. You want to parse the wording on an article about eye damage, while the crimes against humanity continue without any objection from you. The Expose made a generalize statement which you alone insist should be translated to mean 100%. You are going to call everyone liars and then hold your breath until they prove Covid vaccines are harmful, again?
Semimojo: Yet, in an attempt to frightening and sensationalize, they say it was all due to the vaccine.
ransomnote: I would say frightening and horrifying are accurate terms for the killing and maiming taking place right before your eyes, while you translate articles for us to mean different things.
Semimojo:And you're twisting yourself into knots trying to defend their mendacity.
ransomnote: I'm explaining word meanings to you. How I wish you cared about what Fauci/CDC says and does as people die and suffer around us. But, you don't. What Fauci/CDC says and does, what happens to children with strokes and blood clots - you don't have any requests they proof anything the CDC/Fauci and others say about the vaccines. No proof needed - those traitors' assertions are sufficient for you. The key point, the center of focus for you, is parsing text in article like The Expose. Priorities.
Covid 'vaccines' account for 63%% of all reports of blindness post vaccination which the CDC published to VAERS throughout its 30 years of operation.
Medalerts.org ^ | 12/18/2021 | vanity
Posted on 12/18/2021, 3:11:54 PM by ransomnote
At a higher rate than among the unvaccinated?
That's pretty weak.
Of course no one has gotten that vaccine in the US so it's also irrelevant.
LOL. I know it's a lie when that say all of the blindness cases are due to the vaccine. You do too.
What I want is evidence that any of the cases are due to the vaccine.
You can't provide that.
Check the thread I posted at the bottom of this post.
You ignore the extensive proof it's killing people in unprecedented numbers, I'm certain it's a waste of my time for me to post more proof you'll ignore, but I posted it for others.
You've posted no evidence it's killing people at all and your other post is just standard-issue VAERS misrepresentation.
Where is the evidence of a higher rate of ophthalmologic problems among the vaccinated?
athletes are dropping dead in unprecedented numbers...
Could you please provide some evidence that this is the case? If true I'd like to investigate. Show some evidence.
How much proof is enough?
Just a little evidence would be a good start. You don't have any, let alone proof.
More importantly, all of the world's public health agencies track this stuff and say the vaccines are safe.
You're making an extraordinary claim, that all of the professionals are wrong, and extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
Yet you provide none at all.
The Expose made a generalize statement which you alone insist should be translated to mean 100%.
Patent BS.
They said:
"132 people have reported suffering blindness due to the injection."
That's simply not true and you and they know it.
But it makes their story much more compelling than telling the truth - that there have been some reports of blindness but we don't know if there are any more among the vaccinated than among the unvaccinated.
That truth wouldn't get them clicks nor you replies here on FR.
The key point, the center of focus for you, is parsing text in article like The Expose.
Your "whataboutism" aside, the key point is you shouldn't post articles that you know are lies.
You've said you know not all reported adverse events are due to the vaccines.
Yet you keep posting articles from theexpose.uk which explicitly say all of the adverse events are vaccine caused.
You know better but continue to do it and when called on it you wave your hands and try to change the subject to Fauci.
Have some self respect and make honest arguments.
For a shill, you’re boring. Repetitious - is that your indoctrination technique.
WHen you have some time, check out what VAERS is and how it functions. If you do, you’re realize you’ve been distorting it all this time.
Says the person who knowingly posts the same misrepresentations of adverse event data over and over and over.
I'd rather discuss something different but you keep putting up this same drivel.
...check out what VAERS is and how it functions.
Go back and read my posts. It's all explained there.
I had a number of individual comments I though about making, but have decided to copy a detailed letter I sent a political activist friend recently. First I should state my general position. Since so many people are deficient in major nutrients that seem to be specifically involved in Covid illness, our government and leaders should be urging people to improve their nutritional statuse with food, supplements, and sunshine. I suspect a lot of the adverse vaccine reactions are caused by nutritional deficiency states. For example Vitamin D deficiency can cause oversized blood platelets to grow. Some capilaries are so small only a single red blood cell can pass at a time. Enlarged platelets—Covid toe anyone?? Failure of government to urge Vitamin D consumption and/or testing especially in winter, and especially for dark skinned people I consider criminally negligent. At any rate, on with my letter:
“I did not know of I could refind this “encyclopedia” of information on alternate treatment of Covid-19. Eleftherios Gkioulekas (don’t ask me how to pronounce that last name) is a PhD Mathetician who is preserving many important pieces of information about the fight to end Covid. His disclaimer is at the bottom of this link. There are hundreds of links listed, so I recomment viewing this on a computer, not a phone. Some of what I promised to send I found here, other I will have to find elsewhere, but I will list them below this master list. Cheers, Lee
https://faculty.utrgv.edu/eleftherios.gkioulekas/zelenko/index.html A number of links are at “Bitchute” since Google & Youtube have censored and removed links.
https://faculty.utrgv.edu/eleftherios.gkioulekas/zelenko/Vladimir-Zelenko-treatment.pdf This is the original 3/23/20 letter with ccs to Trump and Meadows. I found this at my first link above about 20 lines down at “introduction” where line 5 has the word March and click gives the original letter. [Did Mark Meadows persuade Trump to NOT urge ZINC use, or was it Fauci or both and why???]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CBYLPbxzf0vgi6IRg5Ay6kGwAYX3uVjGS8n0SzQbSAs/edit Here is one of Dr. Zelenko’s revised protocols for prophylaxis (prevention) and treatment of mild/early Covid. The part of Vitamin D and seasonal illness is especially interesting. Also over time he has shifted to Quercetin as the ZINC ionophore, rather than HCQ or Ivermectin as it is available without a doctor’s prescription. Also he has shifted to using the antiobiotic Doxycycline rather than Azithromycin as it is safer for anti-bacterial protection.
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/497838-nih-begins-studying-hydroxychloroquine-and-azithromycin-as-covid-19 This is one report of the decision on May 14, 2020 by NIH to study HCQ and Azithromycin, not the link I saw months ago. Here is Fauci’s quote I mentioned: “We urgently need a safe and effective treatment for COVID-19. Repurposing existing drugs is an attractive option because these medications have undergone extensive testing, allowing them to move quickly into clinical trials and accelerating their potential approval for COVID-19 treatment,” Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. The article also mentions Trump as promoting HCQ and Azithromycin [no zinc by May 2020].
I was facinated to hear Trump as he walked from the helicopter that took him back from Walter Reed to the White House. He was talking about monoclonal antibodies, Remdesivir and other APPROVED treatments. He then muttered, it sounded to me in an angry tone, “and I took Zinc.” Had he finally realized he had been fooled and used?
https://www.fauquier.com/news/update-fauquier-hospital-reports-it-has-complied-with-court-order-asks-for-contempt-order-to/article_8cb9853e-5c3d-11ec-8635-376fda43665b.html This is the court case I think, not DC but Fauquier Co. I will try to contact the reporter or lawyer or doctor as while Ivermectin is good, the zinc, Vitamin D, etc. are also critical. [This in connection with one of a number of doctors wanting to use Ivermectin.]
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043740/ This 2011 article is the fascinating story of Ivermectins discovery, development and use to aid/protect over a billion people directly threatened by the parasitic diseases “river blindness” and Elephantiasis as well as other parasitic human diseases. Most importantly, “Ivermectin has continually proved to be astonishingly safe for human use. Indeed, it is such a safe drug, with minimal side effects, that it can be administered by non-medical staff and even illiterate individuals in remote rural communities, provided that they have had some very basic, appropriate training.” Scary news for the fat cats of big pharma and big medicine. [Also shows the stupidity of celebrities ridiculing this “horse paste.”]
Nah, they were dumb because they got the shot.
I urge parents to never give their children more than 3 vaccines at one time and also only if their child is in good health. I think the military could save deaths and illness in new recruits if thei followed this policy. I have the impression that the Autism rise occurred after more vaccines than 3 started being given simultaneously.
It is important we compare the statistics on various adverse reactions with the statistics from 2018 to get a truer picture of how serious this problem is with and without vaccine use, and whether the percentages of one kind or another issue have become more or less common since the advent of Covid, and the use of vaccines. Only by doing this will we have a suitable data base for making decisions.
I have to agree with that. In eradicating diseases, we’ve weakened the immune systems of several generations so that today, they can’t fight off anything that comes along, including the common cold.
When I was a child, we were given one vaccine at a time. In my son’s day, it was two. I don’t even know how many are required, these days.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Why are so many people going Blind after getting the Covid-19 Vaccine?, gleeaikin wrote: |
It is important we compare the statistics on various adverse reactions with the statistics from 2018 to get a truer picture of how serious this problem is with and without vaccine use, and whether the percentages of one kind or another issue have become more or less common since the advent of Covid, and the use of vaccines. Only by doing this will we have a suitable data base for making decisions. |
No need to wait. We could treat the VAERS 'safety signal' like it was intended to be used. We can simply observe astounding levels of death and disability documented in VAERS for Covid 'vaccines' at levels 20 times and above that of any other vaccine.
A safety signal, like a STOP sign, does not require further information to make a decision to pause product rollout until answers are found. Normally, drugs or vaccines would be pulled off the market until answer are found to spare human suffering and lives.
Normally experimental gene therapy would not be intentionally mislabled a 'vaccine' in order to escape liability and provide a pretense for fake 'public health' mandates.
NOW that we are engaged in biowarfare, those in our government trying to kill us to us are pretending not too see the safety signals (VAERS and others) and data they are almost drowing in.
The CDC/NIH/FDA/FAUCI/Walensky/BIDEN are killing us. In January they all saw the STOP sign at a busy 4-way Covid 'vaccine' intersection, and they hit the gas pedal, telling us we'll sort it all out after we careen through rush hour cross traffic, striking school buses, cars, trucks and pedestrians, not to mention tractor trailers, all of which have the right of way.
Despite 2 years of hard evidence, our government/medical traitors and murderers pretend that Covid is a 'novel' virus, that it's far more dangerous than it is, that there are no treatments in use, and that denying treatment to sick people is the best health public policy, as are the required us of lethal CDC 'Covid protocols' (Remdesivir, Midazolam) in hospitals.
What weird and ...well....intensely evil, is the insistance that we need more information (proof) before we can respond to a VAERs safety signal. Safety signals are what drive people to go get proof, spend the money, set up research etc. But our enemies want to kill as many of us as possible so if anything they double down as they are exposed; demands for vaccination are accelerating, the 'safety signals' are blaring, and shills are saying we have no way to make decisions until we get more information.
I’m just going to get boosters till I need glasses.
Thank you for posting this interesting analysis. I saved it and will look up some of the references given. As always, stay healthy and well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.