Posted on 12/17/2021 10:54:56 AM PST by ransomnote
Thanks, great advise. If I could afford to, I would. BUT that idiot doc who killed Joan Rivers would have killed me too, as I’m as sensitive as JT was to anesthesia. Old doc in Chicago I went to for years told me I’d better not ever be in an accident, because they’d kill me trying to cure me. I had some stomach scan test in SF done by Dr Ostroff, head of Internal Med at UC Hospital in SF, rank one of the top guys. I told him to give me HALF as much anesthetic as he’d give anyone else. The minute the shot hit my arm, I knew it was too much. “You son of a.....I said as I went under.
Three hours late a team of nurses were standing over me slapping my arm, calling my name, and trying to wake me up. I came to a little bit and the first words out of my mouth was...Bitch.” Had to finish that sentence. They let me out and I drove home to Emeryville, across the SF Bay Bridge. Worst drive of my life...they should have kept me there another hour at least.
When I saw Ostroff again, I told him he should have given me half as much, and he said: “I did.”
I really have to fight for my life with all these SOBs.
Actually, my ophthalmologist in Seattle was rated top corneal transplant doc in the world. With a Japanese fellow in SF ranked a close second.
...........
Well that settles it, I guess everyone having adverse reactions are lying, even if it is documented. Yup, your very clever.
The lie is that every adverse event following an vaccination is caused by the vaccine.
There isn't an honest FReeper who wouldn't acknowledge that fact yet people keep posting these lying articles stating otherwise.
I understand why liars like theexpose.uk keep publishing the lies - they get money from clicks.
I don't know why FReepers who know better keep posting them here.
Unfortunately my father is having both ping and heart issues. Good friend is having heart and neurological issues. I hope you are clear. I really won’t be accepting if my dad gets worse. He got his booster and is getting worse. It’s not a joke. I know the boards are splintering us over the vax. Looks like me and my beautiful bride may be having job issues in late or post January but I’m really worried about my dad. I love him dearly. This is just so wrong. Mock all you want. I quit this argument/ discussion. It’s hitting home and I’m honestly worried. 6 months ago, I would have told you my dad would outlive me. (Long complicated health story ) and it no longer seems to be true. My guess is dad would rather me bury him than him bury me. Whatever. You don’t care. You see no evil in this….
I’m sad about it all. I’m also worried about my mom. It’s just not good. I also don’t think it’s necessary. Yet mom and dad decided on the vax + boosters on their own. Im still sad tonight. It’s looking bad.
Mock all you want. They have been brainwashed.
I hope you have no issues. Somewhere i am sure a son or daughter hopes you the best and would be devastated on a early departure.
Mock away.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Why are so many people going Blind after getting the Covid-19 Vaccine?, semimojo quoted: |
| Well that settles it, I guess everyone having adverse reactions are lying, even if it is documented. semimojo wrote: The lie is that every adverse event following an vaccination is caused by the vaccine. ransomnote wrote: It doesn't have to be 'every event' before it matters. VAERS is a safety signal and then your kind insists we all ignore the signal completely. The annual average in vaers prior to Covid bioweapons ('vaccines') was 150 persons dying for about every 250 million vaccinations. No one suggested that all 150 persons (annually) were from whatever vaccines they were given - but it's important to track such information and look for unexplained changes. When the Covid 'vaccines' were under 90 million (late January 2021), there were already 1200 deaths recorded in VAERS post Covid 'vaccines'. Normally we don't have Covid 'vaccines' and the annual count would be 150, but Covid 'vaccines' added 1200 records of death. Any other product would be pulled off the market at 50 deaths. In late January, the vaccination program was still ramping up, and they didn't hesitate to force the vaccines on the public and ignore all safety signals. In the 30 year history of VAERS data collection,there was a total of roughly 10 thousand deaths reported to VAERS (not all directly related, and this would only be a small fraction of actual events as many are never reported to the CDC). Covid 'vaccines' racked up that amount in just 1 year, a rate of 30 times 'normal' reports, whether directly caused or not. Can you see why any experimental vaccine having about the same number of death reports in one year as the combination of all vaccines spanning a 30 year history just might matter? Just recently, we've learned that the Pfizer trial had 1200 deaths in 2 or 3 months. I think their phase III trial was 50,000. Are you capable of understsanding why this is a concern? How about the fact that 50% of Covid vaccine reports of death occur within 48 hours of 'vaccination'? I'm writing facts you will ignore, and the next lament/blame storming you do, you'll pretend I never wrote it, so you don't know it etc. semimojo wrote: There isn't an honest FReeper who wouldn't acknowledge that fact yet people keep posting these lying articles stating otherwise. ransomnote wrote: Your kind agonizes of flat numbers reported for VAERS as if your ox is being gored. I don't see assertions that every case is directly caused. Are you worried about the inference, rather than any statement? Well then why doesn't the inferance of horrific levels of unprecedented death and disabling injury re Covid 'vaccines' bother you, but the idea that some may interpret statements to mean 100% of every report in VAERS is causal. By the way, a causal argument is made by Steve Kirsch and his team: "Each and every symptom we looked at satisfies all the traditional Bradford-Hill causality criteria using both absolute rate elevation compared to baseline rates as well as Dose 1 vs. Dose 2 response disparities." You see, sometimes the CDC lies, and the CDC's insistance that there are no causal data, and that VAERS can't render causal data is just backside covering. But, that's Steve Kirsch's team; I haven't been saying every single case is directly a result and I haven't seen anyone else say it. What matters to you is that some of us are paying attention to a safety signal the CDC wants ignored. semimojo wrote: I understand why liars like theexpose.uk keep publishing the lies - they get money from clicks. ransomnote wrote: Independent researchers, journalists and citizens have stepped into the void to get past the censors and it is KILLIN' your kind. You keep demanding we only cite what amounts to talking points and labeling anyone who gets past the censors as liars out for money. The CDC/NIH/FDA are growing wealthy on their patents on drugs paid for by taxpayer dollars, but that's not the kind of thing of which you disapprove. semimojo wrote: I don't know why FReepers who know better keep posting them here. ransomnote wrote: And so ends semimojo's cryin'-in-his-beer because the board owner won't enact censorship rules which serve Fauci's interests. *yawn* |
So all this time your problem is you don't know what a safety signal is? Look it up - it doesn't mean every case is directly related. It means if unusual numbers show up, like those never seen before (*cough* Covid 'vaccines'*cough*) you respond to the safety signal by pausing and investigating. Instead - the CDC races to get as many people 'vaccinated' as possible, despite violations of human rights, Constitutional rights and the Nuremberg Code, before enough of the truth breaks through the media blackout on such information.
So, you don't know what 'lie' means either? Well now, I guess that explains your posts...
See my links in reply #47.
I have ophthalmic issues. My docs have never mentioned these risks to me.
Inflammatory optic neuropathy following SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine: Description of two cases
Central retinal vein occlusion after mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: A case report
Post Vaccination Optic Neuritis: Observations From the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic
I see my eye doctor every six months. Or more often if needed.
My other docs are aware of the reason.
Not a peep about any risks from the vaxxes to my eyesight from any of them.
Not. A. Word.
I know a friend the suddenly contracted retinitis after getting the 2nd Pfizer vax.
I’m sorry to hear that. How’s your friend doing?
WARNING: If you click on the link to take you to the full article, there are some VERY GRAPHIC pics and descriptions at the full link. The details are NOT for the squeamish.
Behçet’s-like adverse event or inaugural Behçet’s disease after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-1273 vaccination?
That poor patient's ophthalmic issues appear to be the least of it.
LOL
You are not alone: https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3988541/posts?page=279#279
But there are, that's the point.
Theexpose.uk says:
"132 people have reported suffering blindness due to the injection."
That's only true if every adverse event is caused by the vaccine but as you've just said, they aren't.
That means theexpose.uk is lying.
And you keep posting those lies here.
I know what it is and I know theexpose.uk is lying when they say every case of blindness was caused by the vaccine.
You know it too.
I was thinking of VAERs when I responded but I see you’re posting on the UK site. What Steve Kirsch said, of VAERS, is true of the UK yellow card system -it technically does meet the criteria for causality established for statistics prior to Covid. It’s kind of a deflection/religion to insist that someone who’s fine until they are injected and then goes blind MUST BE ASSUMED TO BE UNRELATED or can’t say in an article it caused it (you know, this isn’t a court of law) until the UK Yellow Card system authorizes it.
Safety signals of epic proportions are intentionally being ignored and dismissed versus the Exposes generalized statement (they still didn’t say 100% causal, they just made a general statement you can’t live with).
Are there some cases caused by other factors? Well, will the Yellow Card system investigate and prove with evidence or should we just do what you say, “NOTHING TO SEE HERE! MOVE ALONG!”
While the expose says there is a relationship between injection and blindness - Yellow Card, you, and VAERS insist there isn’t. These statements seem equal in validity, until you look at the overall progress of biowarfare and the fact that the data meets statistical causality (see Steve Hirsch’s ACIP report).
And as I said before - you don’t want any attention paid to unprecedented levels of death and damage so you have little moral high ground upon which to pose while parsing the text and declaiming that generalizations about horrific violations of the Nuremberg Code are instead lies.
I know what it is and I know theexpose.uk is lying when they say every case of blindness was caused by the vaccine.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
They are generalizing about a genocidal holocaust, not lying.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.