Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Totality of Evidence Proves Massive Fraud
November 13 2020 | SELF

Posted on 11/13/2020 4:50:55 AM PST by HypatiaTaught

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: HypatiaTaught

PFL


41 posted on 11/13/2020 6:57:40 AM PST by KevinB (Quite literally, whatever the Left touches it ruins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aliska

Absolutely Correct.
The Issues You
Pointed out are critical.
The lines are drawn and
Could Not be clearer.
.
Liberty Or Tyranny.


42 posted on 11/13/2020 7:14:24 AM PST by Big Red Badger (TRUMP, the Other guy lives in a Basement!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter

It would be more interesting to get the population of the States and the total legal registration for voting for each.
Then compare the results!


43 posted on 11/13/2020 7:16:27 AM PST by Sen Jack S. Fogbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: HypatiaTaught

Yes. That’s a much different story and one to be likely to happen in PA. Since GA and WI are now undergoing recounts themselves, there is no reason for SCOTUS to toss any ballots there. Not sure about MI, but that state matters a LOT because John James was leading in his Senate race before all the fraud and now HE’s behind. If he can reclaim the win that was rightly his, GOP holds the Senate regardless of the GA runoffs. So MI is critical.

I don’t think there is a real appetite to have SCOTUS throw this to the House. Both SCOTUS judges AND House Reps would likely prefer a POTUS to be elected by the people’s votes. So I’m thinking they will rule in that direction, and resist sending it to the House unless that becoimes absolutely necessary.


44 posted on 11/13/2020 7:25:31 AM PST by antonico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

“””It would be more interesting to get the population of the States and the total legal registration for voting for each.”””


Getting the population of each state is easy.

Where are you going to get the “total legal registration” in each state.

Total registered voters is for the most part available in every state. But there is no report on “total legal registration”.


45 posted on 11/13/2020 7:38:28 AM PST by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter

You forgot Ohio it is in the SAME region as the other states Trump WON 53% - 44% I find that even MORE stunning they do not have the Dominion voting machines!!!


46 posted on 11/13/2020 7:54:56 AM PST by Trump Girl Kit Cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: liberalh8ter

I watched this video, then last night, invited my brother to watch it again with me, and both he and I had EXACTLY the same reaction that you did. We talked about this until about 2 AM.

We are both IT people, so we had a degree of commonality in our view of this.

When we were watching the video, he stopped the video at the point where they were discussing the “feature” of including the option of “weighted races” and we both slammed on the brakes and said “What did he just say?”

My brother was angry, and said “WHO asked for that “feature” and WHAT was their justification for asking for it?”

I put on my “Election Official” hat, and then put my “Leftist” hat on as well, in the former, to try to rationally consider what their real need might have been for asking for this feature and getting it implemented, versus the Latter (Leftist hat) what would be their public facing justification (fig leaf) for putting this functionality in place to cover what their nefarious purposes really were.

Wearing the “Election Official” hat, I was wracking my brain (because I don’t know much about the things they might want to do) but I thought they might want the feature for local election issues, for example...if one precinct or locality has larger mean household populations than another precinct of locality and they have some kind of ballot question issue they are voting on, they might want to change the setting for that locale to give the higher mean a value of 1.5 or 2.0 and the lower one a value of 1.0.

Or (and this was my first impression...oddly) like the 3/5 Compromise, it would be done as a way to give some portion of the population (such as the move to restore felon voting rights) less of a weight in their vote, making their vote a 0.5 value to a non-felon who would have a value of one.

Or making an illegal immigrant a value of 0.5.

I have no rational reason why it would be asked for. But my question, I would like to see asked, is WHO asked for this “feature” to be implemented.

There has been much talk about people on the Left (Not only in the USA, but around the world) who have interests or relationships with Dominion Voting Systems. I think it would be fascinating to see who pushed for this “feature”.

But it sure as hell doesn’t support a “One Person, One Vote” system, and anything other than that is third world or tyrannical.


47 posted on 11/13/2020 8:47:30 AM PST by rlmorel ("Leftism is the plaything of a society with too much time on its hands." - Candace Owens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
“WHO asked for that “feature” and WHAT was their justification for asking for it?”

I think Maria Bartiromo has answered that question:

Massive national security issues. Massive. I'm told Dirty Venezuelan & Cuba money behind dominion. The software also has components from china. This is about to explode.

Maria Bartiromo Parler

48 posted on 11/13/2020 9:54:04 AM PST by liberalh8ter (The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: liberalh8ter

Thank you, I will check that out.


49 posted on 11/13/2020 9:57:28 AM PST by rlmorel ("Leftism is the plaything of a society with too much time on its hands." - Candace Owens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson