Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Department of Justice Files Statement of Interest Defending the Constitutionality of Idaho’s Fairness in Women’s Sports Act
justice.gov ^ | June 19, 2020 | DOJ

Posted on 06/20/2020 1:42:25 PM PDT by ransomnote

The Department of Justice today filed a statement of interest in Idaho federal court defending Idaho’s Fairness in Women’s Sports Act against a challenge under the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause.  

“Allowing biological males to compete in all-female sports is fundamentally unfair to female athletes” said Attorney General William P. Barr.  “Under the Constitution, the Equal Protection Clause allows Idaho to recognize the physiological differences between the biological sexes in athletics.  Because of these differences, the Fairness Act’s limiting of certain athletic teams to biological females provides equal protection.  This limitation is based on the same exact interest that allows the creation of sex-specific athletic teams in the first place — namely, the goal of ensuring that biological females have equal athletic opportunities.  Single-sex athletics is rooted in the reality of biological differences between the sexes and should stay rooted in objective biological fact.”

On March 30, 2020, Idaho enacted the Fairness in Women’s Sports Act (Fairness Act), Idaho Code Ann. § 33-6202 et seq., which goes into effect in July 2020.  Idaho’s Fairness Act contains two main provisions.  First, covered athletic teams “shall be expressly designated as one (1) of the following based on biological sex: (a) Males, men, or boys; (b) Females, women, or girls; or (c) Coed or mixed.”  Idaho Code Ann. § 33-6203(1).  Second, “[a]thletic teams or sports designated for females, women, or girls shall not be open to students of the male sex.”  Id. § 33-6203(2).  The Fairness Act does not contain a comparable limitation for biological females who wish to participate on a team designated for biological males. 

In enacting the Fairness Act, Idaho determined that “[h]aving separate sex specific teams furthers efforts to promote sex equality.  Sex-specific teams accomplish this by providing opportunities for female athletes to demonstrate their skill, strength, and athletic abilities while also providing them with opportunities to obtain recognition and accolades, college scholarships, and the numerous other long-term benefits that flow from success in athletic endeavors.”  Id. § 33-6202(12).  In support of this conclusion, the Fairness Act cites authority establishing that inherent physiological differences between men and women generally include a difference in “strength, speed, and endurance” that results in “different athletic capabilities,” which generally give men a significant advantage in head-to-head competition.  Id. § 33-6202(1)-(10). 

In its statement of interest, the United States explains that the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution does not require States to abandon their efforts to provide biological women with equal opportunity to compete for, and enjoy the life-long benefits that flow from, participation in school athletics in order to accommodate the team preferences of transgender athletes.  Put differently, the Constitution does not require Idaho to provide the special treatment plaintiffs request, under which biological males are allowed to compete against biological females if and only if the biological males are transgender.

Attachment(s): 
Topic(s): 
Civil Rights
Component(s): 
Press Release Number: 
20-563


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: idaho

1 posted on 06/20/2020 1:42:25 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

... declared unconstitutional by the 9th Circus in 3 ... 2 .. 1.


2 posted on 06/20/2020 2:14:34 PM PDT by Spacetrucker (George Washington didn't use his freedom of speech to defeat the British - HE SHOT THEM .. WITH GUNS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Liberals now insist that women with XX chromosomes must accept that they will be dominated athletically by women with XY chromosomes. They can take solace, however, in the fact that women with XY chromosomes will be much more competitive with men with XY chromosomes, thus reducing the male-female performance gap. Women with XX chromosomes should probably be steered away from competitive sports because there is no future for them at elite levels.


3 posted on 06/20/2020 2:19:27 PM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

The average male can break the average female in half. The average very fit male can break the average very fit female in half. The suggest otherwise is to mock biology, deny science, and risk harm to women and girls.


4 posted on 06/20/2020 5:21:11 PM PDT by jimfree (My19 y/o granddaughter continues to have more quality exec experience than an 8 year Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson