Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

J.K. Rowling slammed for defending concept of biological sex: 'It isn't hate to speak the truth'
fox ^

Posted on 06/07/2020 10:57:33 AM PDT by BenLurkin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: SeekAndFind

But that isn’t always where it hits hardest.

These cretins are violent and threaten their families never mind their own bodies. Happened before, it’ll happen again.


41 posted on 06/07/2020 12:15:27 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
'It isn't hate to speak the truth'

Where you been. lady? There are people out there who will ruin you or even kill you if you speak the truth.


42 posted on 06/07/2020 12:16:07 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Die-ggl,TWT,FCBK,NYT,WPo,Hwd,CNN,NFL,BLM,CAIR,Antf,SPLC,ESPN,NPR,NBA,ARP,MSNBC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vendome
+1

"She turned Dumbledoor into a fag!"

43 posted on 06/07/2020 12:18:58 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“It isn’t hate to speak the truth.”

Where has the idiot been for the last 10 years (or longer)?


44 posted on 06/07/2020 12:20:13 PM PDT by dynachrome (The panic will end, the tyranny will not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Hey, the trannies better back off, Rowling knows fantasy when she see it.


45 posted on 06/07/2020 12:37:59 PM PDT by myerson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

She’s rich enough, and popular enough, to withstand the barrage of criticism. Nobody can get her fired.


46 posted on 06/07/2020 12:47:04 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
She must have taken a look at her bank balance and determined that she was rich enough to have her own opinions.

Perhaps she even discovered that she doesn't have to listen to everyone telling her how to spend it.

47 posted on 06/07/2020 1:00:23 PM PDT by jonascord (First rule of the Dunning-Kruger Club is that you do not know you are in the Dunning-Kruger club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Of course it is...where the hell have you been???


48 posted on 06/07/2020 1:09:10 PM PDT by TnTnTn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Scrambler Bob
"Lysenkoism, from Trofim Denisovich Lysenko"

"Brawndo. It's got electrolytes."

Climate Change. Bad.
Alar. Bad
Killer bees. Bad
The Next Ice Age. Bad.
Radon Gas. Bad.
Nuclear power. Bad
Electric Cars. Good.
Windmill power. Good.
Masks on the un-infected prevents Covid-19. Good.
Putting sick people in nursing homes. Good.
Black Lives Matter. Good
Antifa. Good.

Leftists really are that stupid. Convince me we should let them live.

49 posted on 06/07/2020 1:20:33 PM PDT by jonascord (First rule of the Dunning-Kruger Club is that you do not know you are in the Dunning-Kruger club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Rowling is estimated to be worth 953 million buckadingdongs so I doubt the proggies are going to hurt her much. Or should I say her fellow proggies. This isn't about whether women menstruate, and most of the people pushing it don't actually believe it either. It's about forcing you to say whatever they want or else.

In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, nor to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is to co-operate with evil, and in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control.

Theodore Dalrymple, "Our Culture, What's Left Of It?"

50 posted on 06/07/2020 1:22:36 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jonascord

Nuclear power. Bad
= = =

Stalin would jail scientists that did not follow their screwed up approach.

Except the Nuke scientists. They were allowed to real work.


51 posted on 06/07/2020 1:41:28 PM PDT by Scrambler Bob (This is not /s. It is just as viable as any MSM 'information', maybe more so!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Scrambler Bob
The Communists in the EPA and DoE have effectively killed Nuclear power in the US. You would exceed their permitted exposure levels by a day at the beach.

It is simply too expensive to build a plant when 75% of the costs is eaten up in regulatory inspections, permissions and massive overkill safety requirements.

And then the Greens will sue you, and with judge shopping, they can ALWAYS find a friendly and stupid judge.

52 posted on 06/07/2020 2:10:46 PM PDT by jonascord (First rule of the Dunning-Kruger Club is that you do not know you are in the Dunning-Kruger club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Will J.K. Rowling be cancelled by the left?


53 posted on 06/07/2020 2:28:11 PM PDT by EdnaMode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode; BenLurkin
Will J.K. Rowling be cancelled by the left?

Yes.

54 posted on 06/07/2020 2:29:57 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

Oh thanks for that image. Good thing dinner is hours away. :)


55 posted on 06/07/2020 2:36:15 PM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: xp38

Sorry about that :-)


56 posted on 06/07/2020 2:38:57 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
how come it is ok for Bruce Jenner to “identify” as female, but wrong for Rachel Dolezal to “identify” as black.

Neither is "wrong" per say.

Mentally ill people have been identifying as impossible things since there have been mentally ill people.

You can identify as a supernova if you like. However it is wrong to try to use political and social pressure to force other people to go along with their delusion.

57 posted on 06/07/2020 2:45:43 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Leave it to me to be holdin' the matches when the fire truck shows up & there's nobody else to blame)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

Bruce Jenner got accollades and Rachel Dolezal got fired. I guess it’s A-OK for NAACP to fire someone because their skin is white?


58 posted on 06/07/2020 2:47:44 PM PDT by yldstrk (Bingo! We have a winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Trumpet 1
Gender is a language term. He is a masculine gender term for a man and she is feminine gender term for a female.

Gender is fluid because it is a language term and language has to be fluid.

Aviatrix was the feminine gender term for a female who flew air planes which has fallen into disuse as the gender neutral term "Pilot" came into common usage.

The correct word for the state of being biological man or a woman is sex. It has always been sex.

Sex is solid because it is based in biology. It is not fluid. A mammal, which is what humans are, has only two sexes, male and female. That is immutable.

59 posted on 06/07/2020 3:05:03 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Leave it to me to be holdin' the matches when the fire truck shows up & there's nobody else to blame)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
Bruce Jenner got accollades and Rachel Dolezal got fired.

Yes.

That is using political and social pressure to force other people to go along with certain delusions. As I have stated, that is wrong. Not illegal as the laws are written but wrong. There is a difference.

I guess it’s A-OK for NAACP to fire someone because their skin is white?

They can fire someone for having Limburger sandwiches for lunch if they like.

Unless you have an employment contract that says you can only be fired for certain reasons during a specified length of time it is a-ok to fire someone for any number of reasons.

Now we do currently have laws saying you can not fire someone for certain reasons one which is for racial heritage. If the NAACP fired her because of her skin shade she would have a cause for legal action against them.

Now if she represented herself as being of a certain racial heritage on her application for employment and she is not of the heritage then they can fire her for lying on her employment form with no repercussions.

60 posted on 06/07/2020 3:28:32 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Leave it to me to be holdin' the matches when the fire truck shows up & there's nobody else to blame)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson