Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Facebook reverses Little Mermaid censorship
The Local (Denmark) ^ | 1/4

Posted on 01/14/2020 3:35:45 PM PST by nickcarraway

Danish MP Mette Gjerskov has found out the hard way that sharing a photo of the Little Mermaid is no simple task.

The Social Democrat attempted to promote her blog on broadcaster TV2’s website with a Facebook ad that included an image of what is arguably Denmark’s most iconic statue.

The image, however, was initially blocked by Facebook for violating the social media network’s policies on nudity.

“The Little Mermaid is simply too naked for Facebook. I cannot advertise for my blog because TV2 chose the mermaid as the visual attraction. I hadn’t seen it coming that our national treasure would be categorized on the same level as child pornography and that sort of abomination,” Gjerskov wrote on Facebook with a screen shot of the company’s rejection, which pointed to “too much bare skin or sexual undertones”.

Gjerskov appealed Facebook’s decision and late on Sunday the social media giant reversed course and decided that the statue, which is based upon Hans Christian Andersen’s fairy tale, was acceptable after all.

But the case did not end there. While Facebook may have given its nod of approval, TV2 had second thoughts and pulled the photo in favour of a generic shot of the Danish flag. The reason? The copyright issues surrounding one of Denmark’s most photographed attractions.

See also: Denmark's iconic symbol... that we can't show you

The family of sculptor Edvard Eriksen is known for being very aggressive about the sculpture’s copyright and numerous Danish media outlets have received a large bill in the mail for using a photo of the Little Mermaid – even though it is arguably the most recognisable image in all of Denmark.

Media outlets, including The Local, have shied away from using photos of the Little Mermaid out of fear of having to fork over a hefty sum to the sculptor’s heirs. According to Gjerskov, TV2 decided that the risk was simply not worth it.

“TV2 has removed the Little Mermaid from my blog because it risks a large bill due to the copyright. Apparently one can’t publish photos of our national treasure without a substantial payment to the artist’s heirs. That’s what the law – approved by parliament – says,” she wrote.

Danish media outlets and the press photographers’ association have been critical of the restrictions on the usage of photos of the Little Mermaid, particularly when those same images can be found all over the internet.

“As photographers, we have great respect for copyright, which we ourselves benefit from. But the Little Mermaid is maybe the most frequently photographed motif in Copenhagen so it’s a bit grotesque that you need to be so careful using the photo editorially,” Lars Lindskov told Politiken in a 2013 story about the copyright issues (which was illustrated with this photo).

The copyright laws stipulate that photos of the Little Mermaid and other public art cannot be used for business purposes when the artwork is the main focus of the photo. Use in media is considered a ‘business purpose’ under the law. There are exceptions for using the photos if there is a clear ‘news context’ but even then many Danish outlets are hesitant to use a clear photo of the Little Mermaid for fear of an unexpected bill, as evidenced by our photo choice above.


TOPICS: Books/Literature; Local News
KEYWORDS: denmark; facebook

1 posted on 01/14/2020 3:35:45 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

If she’d said it was a transitioning merman, FB wouldn’t have objected in the first place.


2 posted on 01/14/2020 3:37:35 PM PST by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

“Gjerskov appealed Facebook’s decision and late on Sunday the social media giant reversed course...”

This is a fundamental problem with all social media — the over reliance on canned algorithms to enforce a “standard”.


3 posted on 01/14/2020 3:41:40 PM PST by Tallguy (Facts be d@mned! The narrative must be protected at all costs!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
“The Little Mermaid is simply too naked for Facebook. I cannot advertise for my blog because TV2 chose the mermaid as the visual attraction. I hadn’t seen it coming that our national treasure would be categorized on the same level as child pornography and that sort of abomination,” Gjerskov wrote on Facebook with a screen shot of the company’s rejection, which pointed to “too much bare skin or sexual undertones”.

Could be worse. She could have been from Brussels...

4 posted on 01/14/2020 3:48:08 PM PST by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Bookmark


5 posted on 01/14/2020 3:53:07 PM PST by aquila48 (Do not let them make you care!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

This, though, is perfectly fine...

https://www-fosters-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.fosters.com/news/20190822/go-topless-day-2019-coming-to-hampton-beach?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&template=ampart&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15790461107308&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fosters.com%2Fnews%2F20190822%2Fgo-topless-day-2019-coming-to-hampton-beach


6 posted on 01/14/2020 3:56:21 PM PST by aquila48 (Do not let them make you care!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hatteras

6 foot tall and full of muscle?


7 posted on 01/14/2020 4:24:30 PM PST by Kommodor (Terrorist, Journalist or Democrat? I can't tell the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I once had a photo blocked on facebook. It was a photo of a water tower. They have dirty minds over there at Facebook.

(I hit the link for a human to check out the photo and it was unblocked in a couple of hours.)


8 posted on 01/14/2020 4:24:53 PM PST by CIB-173RDABN (I am not an expert in anything, and my opinion is just that, an opinion. I may be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kommodor

I said, “do you speak-a my language?”


9 posted on 01/14/2020 4:25:45 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; a fool in paradise; acapesket; Baynative; beef; BullDog108; Califreak; cgbg; ...

This is the Facebook Is Evil ping list.

If you'd like to be on or off this list, please click Private Reply below and drop me a FReepmail.

10 posted on 01/14/2020 4:33:18 PM PST by upchuck (For muslims to freely practice Islam, others must die. ~ h/t Lurkinanloomin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

“He just offered me a vegemite sandwich”

IT TOOK ME DECADES TO REALIZE THAT LINE!!!!


11 posted on 01/14/2020 5:22:47 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

In 20% of the world, any female not in a burqa is indecent.


12 posted on 01/14/2020 6:08:02 PM PST by a fool in paradise (Decade of decision for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

They burqified her?


13 posted on 01/14/2020 6:09:14 PM PST by combat_boots (God bless Israel and all who protect and defend her! Merry Christmas! In God We Trust! Hi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

“In 20% of the world, any female not in a burqa is indecent.”

Our TV shows aren’t far behind. Count the number of women dressed like men wearing those awful black pants.


14 posted on 01/14/2020 7:46:25 PM PST by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kommodor
Haha, no. Belgium has their own "national treasure"...

Manneken Pis

15 posted on 01/15/2020 4:15:21 AM PST by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson