Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spanish Tercios: One Of The Greatest Infantry Forces In European History
YouTube ^ | July 24, 2018 | History Uncovered

Posted on 11/14/2019 6:18:11 PM PST by SunkenCiv

Spanish Tercios were considered by many to be the most dominant infantry fighting force throughout Early Modern Europe. Developed as a unit in the first part of the 16th century, they dominated European battlefields for nearly 150 years. Learn what made them so effective and what separated them from other powers that tried to emulate their success on the field of battle. Music: The Spanish Guitar in the Renaissance and Baroque.

Spanish Tercios: One Of The Greatest Infantry Forces In European History | History Uncovered | Published on July 24, 2018


Spanish Tercios: One Of The Greatest Infantry Forces In European History | History Uncovered | Published on July 24, 2018

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS: History; Science; Travel
KEYWORDS: battleoflepanto; godsgravesglyphs; history; lepanto; ottomanempire; spain; spanishempire; spanishtercios; tercios; thirtyyearswar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
The success of the Tercio system was an interesting one. Clearly it worked very well for Spain, it had such success that others around Europe, particularly in Italy and Germany were emulating the Spanish pike and shot formations. Yet, it was the Spanish Tercios which are remembered and were by far the most successful.
What made the Spanish Tercios so legendary and brutally proficient? Was their discipline as huge as we think?
by Jesus Rueda Rodriguez
credit to Augusto Ferrer-Dalmau


credit to Augusto Ferrer-Dalmau

1 posted on 11/14/2019 6:18:11 PM PST by SunkenCiv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; 31R1O; ...

2 posted on 11/14/2019 6:18:52 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Looks like it’s worth watching, thanks !!


3 posted on 11/14/2019 6:22:13 PM PST by 11th_VA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Mere pikers when compared to the Highland Clan system of Scotland and their war pipes.


4 posted on 11/14/2019 6:24:40 PM PST by Candor7 ((Obama Fascism)http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2009/05/barack_obam_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA
I enjoyed it, I think you will too.

5 posted on 11/14/2019 6:27:02 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Very cool


6 posted on 11/14/2019 6:37:12 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Any PC gamers out there? Pike and Shot covers this eara if the Spanish Tercio.

https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2014/10/24/pike-and-shot-review/


7 posted on 11/14/2019 6:50:59 PM PST by freedomson (Tagline comment removed by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

I’ll take Gustavus Adolphus for $500, Alex.


8 posted on 11/14/2019 8:20:29 PM PST by happyathome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: happyathome

Until the Dutch changed the arms mix on them by adding more firearms so they had a rolling volley that eventually helped them win independence from Spain after 80 years of fighting.


9 posted on 11/14/2019 8:28:15 PM PST by JMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Nope. Tercios would kick their ass.


10 posted on 11/14/2019 8:51:34 PM PST by The Cuban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

At the time the Tercios were being developed, the Scots didn’t do all that well against the English at Flodden (1513) and Solway Moss (1542)


11 posted on 11/14/2019 9:17:08 PM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: happyathome
I’ll take Gustavus Adolphus for $500, Alex.

You win at Breitenfeld but you lose at Nördlingen.

12 posted on 11/14/2019 9:23:15 PM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill; Candor7; SunkenCiv; BenLurkin; All

I just finished reading the novel Agincourt. It featured the English and Welsh long bowmen who also won at Crecy and Poitier previously. Apparently the reason no other military adopted the long bow was that in England training started at an early age and it took about 10 years to develop the strength and skill to use the long bow. Also, it seems to have become a popular fad which increased skilled members. I also recently read a novel about the struggle to control the Mediterranean Sea in the 1500s. Suliman the Magnificent decided to try to take over the Sea in the early part of century conquering the isle of Rhodes. The Knights Hospitalier fled to Malta and set up shop and had a great battle in the 1560s with Turks. Muslim raids up and down the coasts of Greece, Italy, France, Spain and north Africa decimated populations and had bad results that probably affect those areas even today. I always wondered why Spain did not do better with all that gold and silver coming from the Americas. It was mostly spent on wars and ships. When Pizarro got Atehualpa’s treasure worth more than a million dollars then, the king of Spain had to spend it all to replace his navy which had been destroyed by a freak tornado. And that was just one disaster. Carlos V and Philip II were the unlucky kings, and then the Spanish navy was destroyed by a storm when trying to invade England under Elizabeth. Meanwhile, the poor pope was trying hard to get the various European “Christian” countries to fight the Muslims who were still pixxed over the Crusades.


13 posted on 11/14/2019 9:44:32 PM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin

I have often wondered why the Europeans didn’t invade and conquer the Barbary Coast, which they could have easily done during the centuries they were taking over the New World and fighting with one another in Europe. It wasn’t until the second decade of the nineteenth century that the Barbary pirates were finally subdued.


14 posted on 11/14/2019 10:51:54 PM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Goetz von Berlichingen woulda owned this thread


15 posted on 11/14/2019 11:11:44 PM PST by wardaddy (I applaud Jim Robinson for his comments on the Southern Monuments decision ...thank you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

But why omit the Bruce and the battle of Stirling Bridge?


16 posted on 11/15/2019 3:13:45 AM PST by Candor7 ((Obama Fascism)http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2009/05/barack_obam_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

I’m proud of my Scottish heritage, but the Spanish tercios, German landsknechts, Swiss pikemen, or any other heavy infantry or combined arms force of the period would have swept them off the battlefield. The Scots were perfectly fine irregular light infantry. They were effective on their own terrain and for raiding and skirmishing. The Scots also had a warrior culture that produced splendid regular soldiers once they came in numbers into the British army. But light infantry is light infantry. It played an important role in difficult terrain that impeded heavier formations and could be important as auxiliary troops for heavier regular armies. In main force engagements, however, the Scots were one trick ponies. Like so many other “barbarian” armies over the centuries, they relied on a wild charge to break an opponent’s formation, and if that failed, they were overmatched.


17 posted on 11/15/2019 3:39:41 AM PST by sphinx (q2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Stirling Bridge occurred in 1297, about 300 years earlier. By the sixteenth century, the Scottish spear, which had dominated the battlefields of northern Britain was becoming obsolete as firearms technology advanced.


18 posted on 11/15/2019 5:37:09 AM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I watched that last night.


19 posted on 11/15/2019 5:38:13 AM PST by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sphinx
In main force engagements, however, the Scots were one trick ponies. Like so many other “barbarian” armies over the centuries, they relied on a wild charge to break an opponent’s formation, and if that failed, they were overmatched.

The wild charge by the claymore-waving Scottish Jacobites at Culloden in 1746 actually took some of the government troops down, but the muskets with bayonets and artillery of the government force eventually won the day.

20 posted on 11/15/2019 5:46:07 AM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson