Posted on 10/28/2019 3:58:39 PM PDT by grundle
“Alternatively, the pure carbon dioxide stream could be compressed and injected underground for long-term disposal, or even made into fuel through a series of chemical and electrochemical processes. “
generating the energy to do any of that probably emits several tons of CO2 into the atmosphere for every ton compressed and injected or converted into fuel ...
there’s no free lunch in physics and chemistry ...
Iron sulfate added to the ocean fed plankton, which incorporated CO2 into a bloom. Salmon delighted in the fresh food thus made available. A record catch later ensued.
Say goodbye to the Impossible
Whopper.....
No CO2...no urea cycle...you die of ammonia toxicity....look it up...climate change clowns...
Seems like a lot of work and expensive materials to get some co2, when The Almighty has already perfected the process in trees.
Wonder what the climate will be like with no life whatsoever on the planet???
God already invented a Carbon Dioxide removal system - it’s called, “Green Plants”
Actually, a large number of REAL scientists knew the rate at which the Gulf would clear the oil. It’s just that they didn’t make it into the Fake News.
But as part of the air scrubber system on a submarine or spacecraft, it could be valuable.
The astronauts on Apollo 13 already figured it out, using spare parts in the middle of outer space with less computing power than a tomogotchi...
Especially if, as seems likely, we are entering another Little Ice Age. These periods are characterized by famine and removing CO2 from the atmosphere would exacerbate that effect. And, if in 20 years, the climate is colder and crops are failing, the process of draining the CO2 out of the atmosphere will not stop and will be, in fact, expanded on the theory that it is the CO2 that is causing the cold and the famine.
Actually I have seen some (Millions of Year scale) graphs which indicate that CO2 concentrations LAG global warming cycles, not LEAD them.
If that’s true, it could imply that global temp increases cause CO2 increases, not the other way around.
Why on earth would you think sucking all the co2 out of the air was the plan? That’s absurd.
Yep. And they are just stupid enough to do exactly that.
You sound personally offended. What's your stake in this? Are you the author? An investor? The inventor?
I’ve seen the same scales. I’ve also seen some that show ancient periods when C02 levels were much higher than at present while temps remained moderate. The innocent public’s been sold a bunch of pseudo-scientific hogwash for purely political reasons: global governance and income redistribution. The thing that really bothers me is that the people most affected, like energy producers, seem to just roll over and buy into the myth. Maybe there’s money to be made from it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.