Posted on 10/21/2019 6:48:47 AM PDT by Conserv
Her ratings are richly deserved.
Poor old See BS...............First it was Connie Chung, then Katie Couric, now this loser........................
Its not merely because she’s anti-Trump. The entire corporate, mainstream, oligopolist mainstream media is anti-Trump.
Its because broadcast TV is a dying media. Its ownership and its ideology is become more and more concentrated, and that’s because it simply can’t compete with everything the internet has to offer for news.
I laugh at her ad’s when I watch CBS. They tell me that CBS is “News you can trust” I fall out of my chair laughing thinking about trust is not a state that I associate with CBS of the 7 million dollar woman. When someone is a liar and so anti Trump, go have coffee with Kelly and fight over who will pay fro it.
Does anyone actually believe that over 5,000,000 people actually watch the CBS evening news or for that matter any of the network newscasts. Would really like to see just how Nielsen does those “ratings”, how they are formulated and just who pays for them.
An angry lib anti-Trumper isn’t getting ratings? Really?
Just look at her, she oozes anger.
It’s one of the MSM alphabet slimeworks.
No one believes anyone on the screen.
Period.
Anyone getting their news from TV is dumber than a “studies” professor.
Does anyone still turn on their TVs to learn new "news"? I watch next to no TV news and honestly I think I'm more informed than 99.9% of the sheeple. Except for breaking events, and sports, my TV is dark most of the day.
Well, since I am usually up before 5:00AM and at work before these shows start, I’ve not made morning news shows a viewing habit in many years. Did like Joan Lunden on GMA and Kathleen Sullivan on This Morning back in the day though, lol.
Too bad Doctor Raoul isn’t around to see this. She was one of his favourite targets. I’m sure he’s laughing from above.
I dont. I bet its similar to how Shepard Smith had such good ratings. Many cable boxes still tuned to last nights program while the home owner is working today. The tv screen is off but the cable box is still sending tuned-to metrics back to corporate.
Imagine their ratings if they actually made a point of telling the truth. 62 million customers looking for some network to take their business.
Does anyone actually believe that over 5,000,000 people actually watch the CBS evening news or for that matter any of the network newscasts.
*****************
And do the “viewers” actually WATCH most of the newscast or is it just background noise? I suspect the number of eyeballs that are focused for the entirety of the show is far below what is reported.
Tom Tucker: “You hear that? You hear that tone you’re using? That’s penis repellent right there.”
Why did they pay somebody millions of dollars to do this? I mean they could probably pick a name out of a hat , pay them minimum wage to read the news, and get better ratings.
See-BS. News you can trust.
Even that’s a damnable lie.
Jeff Glor was somewhat even-handed in reporting the news. Now, it is CBS’ version of MSNBC. Can’t trust what they show.
You certainly have a way with words; you silver-tongued rascal. That was my thought precisely; only, probably not as succinct.
I watch 0 news. Or talk shows or Fox News. Or Anything else. And yes, Im more informed than 99% of the public. I have a friend who is a tv news junkie. Thinks shes really informed. Shell email me something she thinks is off the wall but groundbreaking. My response is always.....I knew about that 1-2 weeks ago and thats not the whole story. But shell tell you she is informed!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.