Posted on 09/13/2019 1:59:52 PM PDT by Red Badger
Dutch savagely murdering their mothers to make room for the new islamonazi occupants of the country. Makes perfect sense
Assuming that it was even their signature .... predatory greedy relatives given a legal option!!!
Did Mom have a large estate?
I would wager that in some countries, people are kept alive for the sole purpose of providing organs to heads of state and captains of industry. I would also wager that many of our high profile liberal celebrities and politicians in America would have no problem doing that for themselves.
We will come to it as VLTA- very late term abortion. Same thing. It is execution for the crime of inconvenience. Inconvenience is a capital crime in the Brave New Progressive World. First it is inconvenience to individuals but becomes inconvenience to the State. It is in our future.
That they held her down to euthanize her after she seemed to change her mind. At that point, it was against her will. What an awful way to die. It’s like how criminals are put to death.
😱😥 Sickening.
The Nazi's are still in Holland.
Don’t move to Europe And for Gods sake, don’t have a daughter who wants you dead
Probably not a good idea to have a daughter who wants you dead, regardless of where you live.
NO different than swatting someone or the next step, submitting euthanasia requests for someone without telling them. Or for nurses and docs just offing all on their own, people under their care. Via accidental or deliberate accidents.
Would this qualify for Terri’s List ping?
Folks, the slippery slope is that they didn’t tell you that once you make the decision you’ll never be judged competent enough to change your mind. Welcome to the 4th Reich...
My wife other neighbors all thought they should let her die except myself and her Husband. After making that decision she came out of her coma after over a month. Today she is fine with very little side effects of her coma.
I'm hoping my wife learned something form that? oh boy.
You talkin bout how the muzzys treat the Swedes?
Nice.
SMH
And I think we ALL have THAT family story, even if distant, about how some old relative was tricked into handing over their rights and their fortunes to their kids or whomever.
Makes my stomach curdle every time.
Now you can REALLY get rid of them.
Here is a philosophical question, related to the basic subject in this report.
Is it a form of “assisted euthanasia” when doctors remove a feeding tube and breathing help from a dementia patient in the hospital (in what they called the “end of life” stage of dementia), because doing so agrees with the DNR the patient had signed before her life entered the state of dementia?
Or is it “murder” to watch as her body, in its dementia state, struggles in its last throws to sustain life?
I have experienced this in my family, and I still wrestle with it. You want to honor what the person said was their wishes, yet YOU struggle with what that finally means.
It is disturbing. She made the decision in ignorance of how she would feel in a different state of mind because, of course, we have no way of knowing the future much less of knowing how we will feel in that future once we come to truly know what before we only feared. Dementia or not, she was in a much better position to know how she felt about living and the value of her life once she actually had Alzheimer’s than she could ever know before experiencing it. In fact, when she was being murdered she was the most well-informed person in the room concerning the disease.
And THAT is why it is disturbing. Clearly, since she was fighting, she had changed her mind, as she should have had a right to do. Clearly by the doctor and family’s behavior, they had quit giving a shit about her as a human being with an opinion long before. She was murdered not because it was her will- her opinion changed. She was murdered because it was the most economical and convenient option for THEM.
I say that as someone who is a caregiver for such a person. It would be so much more convenient not to have to deal with it, not to have to put this person ahead of my own desires and dreams and so on. But we weren’t put here on earth to serve our own ambition, we were put here to serve God, and nowhere does God give us a pass on serving the ‘least’ among us.
Absolutely!!! I’ve had cancer and computer issues but I know I still have Terri’s ping list some place, I’ll look for it later if Bykr Bayb doesn’t get to it.
HORRIBLE!!
Hippocratic Oath: First do no harm.
Hippocritic Oath: First do some harm.
A largely unknown truth: the disabled were the Nazis’ first victims!
National Right to Life ^ | SEPT. 13, 2019 | Dave Andrusko
Posted on 9/13/2019, 2:36:59 PM by Morgana
It can’t be said too often that too often we know too little about history–and what we do know often is either wrong or incomplete.
Over the years we’ve posted many stories that buttress and support what remains to many, many people an unknown historical truth–the Nazis “refined” their murderous system with their notorious Aktion T-4 euthanasia program.
As Peter Saunders has so eloquently written, “The horrific genocide of six million Jews was in fact only the final chapter in the Nazi holocaust story.”
Beginning in 1939, 300,000 disabled people “were gassed or given a lethal injection and cremated in six killing facilities in Germany and Austria,” writes Michael Cook. “This helped the Nazi regime to refine its system for processing millions, rather than ‘just’ thousands, of victims.”
One of the best articles I ever read appeared in the New York Times under the headline, “The Nazis’ First Victims Were the Disabled,” by Kenny Fries. Fries is himself Jewish and disabled, wrote about the connection between Aktion T4, the Nazi “euthanasia” program, and the extermination of the disabled, explaining
I first discovered that people with disabilities were sterilized and killed by the Nazis when I was a teenager, watching the TV mini-series “Holocaust” in 1978. But it would be years before I understood the connections between the killing of the disabled and the killing of Jews and other “undesirables,” all of whom were, in one way or another, deemed “unfit.”
The [German] neurologist [to whom Fries is explaining his research] does not know much about what I’m telling him. While he does know that approximately 300,000 disabled people were killed in T4 and its aftermath, he doesn’t know about the direct connection between T4 and the Holocaust. He doesn’t know that it was at Brandenburg, the first T4 site, where methods of mass killing were tested, that the first victims of Nazi mass killings were the disabled, and that its personnel went on to establish and run the extermination camps at Treblinka, Belzec and Sobibor.
Saunders added
The detail of how it happened, and particularly the role of doctors in the process, is not at all well known.
What ended in the 1940s in the gas chambers of Auschwitz, Dachau, and Treblinka had much more humble beginnings in the 1930s in nursing homes, geriatric hospitals and psychiatric institutions all over Germany.
When the Nazis arrived, the medical profession was ready and waiting.
Fries cites the hugely influential 1920 book, “Permitting the Destruction of Unworthy Life” by Alfred Hoche, a psychiatrist, and Karl Binding, a distinguished lawyer, “which became the blueprint for the exterminations of the disabled carried out by the Third Reich.” But he quite rightly hears ominous contemporary echoes.
A reading of Hoche and Binding, Fries remarks,
shows the similarity between what they said and what exponents of practical ethics, such as Peter Singer, say about the disabled today. As recently as 2015, Singer, talking with the radio host Aaron Klein on his show, said, “I don’t want my health insurance premiums to be higher so that infants who can experience zero quality of life can have expensive treatments.”
Fries ends with this inquiry with an admonition and warning:
What kind of society do we want to be? Those of us who live with disabilities are at the forefront of the larger discussion of what constitutes a valued life. What is a life worth living? Too often, the lives of those of us who live with disabilities are not valued, and feared.
At the root of this fear is misunderstanding, misrepresentation, and a lack of knowledge of disability history and, thus, disabled lives.
Everyone who could see what is happening. Now, young human life is worth nothing. Old human life is worth less than that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.