Skip to comments.Mandatory USC sex training tells students ‘consent is never a blanket statement’
Posted on 09/12/2019 9:10:33 AM PDT by C19fan
As students returned to campus for the fall semester, the University of Southern California rolled out a program set on instilling the concept of affirmative consent, in hopes of making a yes means yes attitude the standard in every sexual encounter at USC.
Brenda Ingram, director of Relationship and Sexual Violence Prevention and Services at USC Student Health, launched the initiative called Trojans Respect Consent, in which all incoming freshmen, were required, beginning Monday, to undergo 90 minutes of training on her concept of affirmative consent, according to a school news release.
(Excerpt) Read more at campusreform.org ...
Get it in WRITING will be next.
Dunno why they bother. Once some poor shlub’s hook-up decides she didn’t really mean “yes” after all, the school’s disciplinary committee will back her all the way anyway.
I do not think getting it in writing will cover liability. A person who say Yes one second can switch No the next. It seems only a video of the whole encounter will pass mustard.
Trojans and consent in the same sentence. Not sure exactly what to make of that.
Just in case you are wondering what kind of person talks/thinks like this....
They are also considering a “Sheldon Cooper” type roommate agreement. /s
If the video shows she was inebriated, off to prison he will go.
What does that mean?
Sounds like consent is never consent.
Do we need to add another 500 pages to the written consent contract?
Is there a safe harbor clause we can use?
Do sex dolls need to give consent?
I understand that the military used to teach that if a woman was under the influence of alcohol and a man took advantage of that, it was rape.
We need to add a blood alcohol test to the written consent agreement.
Why is the man taking advantage of her?
How does one measure who got more pleasure?
What about psych meds?
“She enjoys ... playing her saxophone for self-care”
Why don’t they just forbid sex between any students for any reason? It’s an old rule, but much a clearer way of achieving their goal of disrupting a functional, heterosexual society. I’m sure the 347 other genders will be happy to “take one for the team” and stop having any form of sexual contact, as long as doing so hastens the Socialist Revolution. :)
I think that the idea is that someone under the influence of alcohol or drugs cannot give consent.
Thus you need to obtain consent before any impairment. And whether such consent can even premeditate impairment and can extend to after the impairment is anybody’s guess./
Or mood swings
gold digging expectations
There is actually a scene in a movie set in the “near future” called Cherry 3000 where, at the singles bar, there are four people at each table. A guy, a girl, and their attorneys, negotiating the terms of the contract to be written up regarding how far they will go, sexually, when they leave the place and are alone.
And the premise of the movie is about a guy trying to get a spare part to get his robot wife up and running again.
Amazingly prescient theme.
Now you’ve got it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.