Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Pelham; ransomnote; Ohioan; rockrr
Pelham: "You mean like Barry Goldwater did? And Ronald Reagan? And William F Buckley? "

1960s era civil rights laws typically passed Congress with overwhelming majorities of both parties support.
In both parties Northern Congressmen voted nearly 100% for the new laws and Southerners nearly 100% opposed.
Since nearly all Southerners then were Democrats, they made Democrat majorities smaller than Republicans'.

Those non-Southern Republicans (such as you mention here) who opposed some of the new laws did so on grounds that businesses should be able to choose their customers.
None in my memory continued opposition once the laws had passed.

Barry Goldwater, iirc, ended his career in a much different key than his song in 1964.

56 posted on 07/29/2019 5:31:50 PM PDT by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: BroJoeK
Barry Goldwater, iirc, ended his career in a much different key than his song in 1964.

Now there's an understatement!

57 posted on 07/29/2019 5:40:50 PM PDT by rockrr ( Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: BroJoeK

“Barry Goldwater, iirc, ended his career in a much different key than his song in 1964. “

Elaborate on what you mean.


58 posted on 07/29/2019 6:06:14 PM PDT by Pelham (Secure Voter ID. Mexico has it, because unlike us they take voting seriously)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: BroJoeK; Pelham; ransomnote; rockrr; wardaddy; DiogenesLamp; Dick Bachert; GSWarrior; ...
1960s era civil rights laws typically passed Congress with overwhelming majorities of both parties support. In both parties Northern Congressmen voted nearly 100% for the new laws and Southerners nearly 100% opposed.

While I do not want to touch off one of these divisive debates, which divert attention away the more immediate issues in today's politics, there is a palpable, if implied, fallacy in your argument, yesterday, which should at least deserve a more than passing comment.

The propensity of politicians (Left, Right or just eager for attention) to jump on bandwagons, can never justify the notion that basic moral or legal questions should simply be determined by "counting noses." The idea that Government should have the right to forbid citizens, able to afford to hire others with their own funds, from exercising their preferences for their kith & kin, or people who share their theological views or a common history, is not validated in respect to our cultural insights by politicians' climbing on bandwagons.

"Civil Rights" vs. Civil Liberties

63 posted on 07/30/2019 10:00:38 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson