Skip to comments.
Radiation Levels of Sunken Russian Nuclear Submarine 100,000 Times Higher Than Normal
Newsweek ^
| 7/10/19
| David Brennan
Posted on 07/10/2019 1:19:29 PM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
To: Mouton
I was thinking that if this was Japan instead of Norway that we would soon be seeing Godzilla in real life.
21
posted on
07/10/2019 1:47:06 PM PDT
by
taxcontrol
(Stupid should hurt - dad's wisdom)
To: GraceG
And more romantic, since you can eat it in the dark!..............
22
posted on
07/10/2019 1:48:07 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
To: CondoleezzaProtege
Godzira! Godzira!
Wait.....this is Norway.
Godzira, uff da! Godzira, uff da!
23
posted on
07/10/2019 1:48:18 PM PDT
by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: Stirner
In fact, Ive long believed that the safest (and cheapest) way to dispose of nuclear waste is to dump it on some deep area of the sea floor. Instead, we spend many billions of dollars and decades of time trying to get approval to bury it in a salt mine in Nevada. I used to work with a professional engineer, who had formerly been employed by the EPA. IIRC, one of his favorite sayings was:
"The solution for polution is dilution!"
;^)
24
posted on
07/10/2019 1:49:41 PM PDT
by
Who is John Galt?
("He therefore who may resist, must be allowed to strike.")
To: BenLurkin
Well that’s not great but it’s not horrifying.
25
posted on
07/10/2019 1:51:07 PM PDT
by
KC_Lion
To: Stirner
dispose of nuclear waste is to dump it on some deep area of the sea floor. Is it still waste,
if it can be re-conditioned/constituted and
used again to fuel a reactor?
Galen Winsor
7
26
posted on
07/10/2019 1:52:16 PM PDT
by
infool7
(Observe, Orient, Pray, Decide, Act!(it's an OOPDA loop))
To: Stirner
Make more sense to store it on the moon anyway. The economics of Gerry Anderson.
Get the waste in the big black and fling towards the sun and keep your moon in orbit.
27
posted on
07/10/2019 1:52:52 PM PDT
by
wally_bert
(Hola. Me llamo Inspector Carlton Lassiter. Me gusta queso.)
To: CondoleezzaProtege
Oh really?
What is the normal radiation level of a sunken Russian nuclear submarine?
28
posted on
07/10/2019 1:54:04 PM PDT
by
MrEdd
(Caveat Emptor)
To: CondoleezzaProtege
Assuming “normal” is defined as the natural background radiation, 100,000 times would be equivalent to radiation levels recorded in vicinity of Fukushima reactors during the accident there.
29
posted on
07/10/2019 1:54:42 PM PDT
by
C19fan
To: Red Badger
“Why is my lutefisk glowing?”
From what I’ve heard about how they prepare it, that’s completely normal.
CC
30
posted on
07/10/2019 1:58:05 PM PDT
by
Celtic Conservative
(My cats are more amusing than 200 channels worth of TV)
To: Celtic Conservative
31
posted on
07/10/2019 2:04:02 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
To: Stirner
Will thermoclines keep it down there?
32
posted on
07/10/2019 2:06:07 PM PDT
by
CrazyIvan
(The Democrat party. A collaboration of Cloward-Piven and Dunning-Kruger.)
To: Mouton
With three eyes.
33
posted on
07/10/2019 2:06:54 PM PDT
by
Alas Babylon!
(The media is after us. Trump's just in the way.)
To: Stirner
the safest (and cheapest) way to dispose of nuclear waste is to dump it on some deep area of the sea floor.Don't give the Ruskies any ideas of what to do with their aging nuke subs.
34
posted on
07/10/2019 2:10:18 PM PDT
by
McGruff
To: C19fan; SunkenCiv; BenLurkin
Sounds like the mini-sub stuck its sample tube up close to the leak at the vent. Unless every other sample was taken in the same place, one high sample can’t be compared to “normal “.
35
posted on
07/10/2019 2:11:48 PM PDT
by
Robert A Cook PE
(The democrats' national goal: One world social-communism under one world religion: Atheistic Islam.)
To: outofsalt
But two mouths to eat with !
If history teaches us anything, it’s that it does not teach us to listen?
To: CondoleezzaProtege
To: CondoleezzaProtege
Too much radiation on a Russian sub. Unexpected.
38
posted on
07/10/2019 2:19:30 PM PDT
by
lurk
To: CondoleezzaProtege
So what is the normal radiation level for a sunken Russian nuclear sub?
39
posted on
07/10/2019 2:24:37 PM PDT
by
Howie66
("...Against All Enemies, Foreign and Democrat.....")
To: Stirner
The whole point of land storage of nuclear waste is containment. If Caesium-137 is in ocean water it can go anywhere, including your next meal. It’s a gamma emitter. People don’t have 14 feet of water in their bodies to block it. Think about that. Yeah, with sufficient dilution maybe they’ll only get a little bit of cancer. /s
40
posted on
07/10/2019 2:44:35 PM PDT
by
Justa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson