NYPD officer in murder for hire plot speaks to her stone-faced husband...

New York Daily News ^ | 05/30/19 | Stephen Rex Brown

[Politically Correct]

Destroying evidence is a crime against the government while the two attempted murders are merely crimes against individuals. Your death is only half as important as making some civil "servant's" job a little more difficult.

^^^This!

[Kartographer]

Easiest and most prefect way is to make it look as if your intended victim has dirt on the Clintons, problem solved!

[Texas Eagle]

Not to derail the thread or anything, but didn’t Hitlery destroy far more than two iphones? Why do we never hear of the potential sentence she faces?

[ronniesgal]

some things you don’t delegate. If the Evil Queen had taken out Snow White herself, guess who would still be fairest in the land?

[Teacher317]

I'm quite sure that this upstanding female officer always treated people properly, never abused her position of authority, and never punished people inappropriately. Ahem.

[Pearls Before Swine]

By then, she was cheating with a boyfriend who contacted the FBI and wore a wire against Cincinelli after she asked him to locate a shooter this past February.

You just can't trust anyone these days. Neither the wife, nor the wife's boyfriend.

[Fido969]

Lying and crying, the Jussie Skillet defense.

[moovova]

Yep...cloths and sledgehammers came to mind when I read this.

[moovova]

Oh and...is there any doubt Hillary wouldn’t have Bill whacked if the need arose?

[susannah59]

Generally speaking, if you have a secret, and one other person knows the secret, it’s not a secret.

I agree that “murder for hire” is one of the stupidest crimes anyone can commit. If you don’t know the “hit man” you are probably going to be recorded and very possibly end up on an episode of some crime show or other. If you do know the “hit man” that’s still a likely outcome. Even if he’s a family member and not wearing a wire, given the choice between your skin and his, he’s going to choose his.

Even some otherwise ruthless criminals may have some sort of conscience in some areas. I watched a program a while back where a woman persuaded her husband to kill her ex-husband and the father of her child. While in jail, the husband could not resist boasting about the crime to his cellmate, a man who was in on drug charges.

The cellmate promptly ratted him out. It turned out that this tough criminal was outraged at the murder. “They killed that man for no reason- they killed him for trying to be a good father!” You could hear the genuine outrage in his voice. If the killing had been a drug deal gone bad he wouldn’t have batted an eye, but killing a man because he wanted to be a part of his child’s life was more than he could stomach.

[rockrr]

I still have a tape recording of my x-FIL offering (to my x) to shoot me in the head and bury me in the woods.

[semaj]

Of course, there’s that too.

[Calvin Locke]

As in “I got a .45 and a shovel. No one will miss” ‘him’?

[dp0622]

Well let’s not get crazy...

That was a fun twist on an old story line :)

[dp0622]

If he’s into S&M :)

[Larry Lucido]

:-)

[rockrr]

yep

[dp0622]

It’s VERY obvious to the police!

But it was also VERY, VERY obvious that the guy who ran down Gotti’s kid was murdered by Gotti or friends of Gotti.

Didn’t matter.

But I always through Gotti wasn’t physically involved.

Now they are saying he was and in a brutal kind of way.

[usconservative]

The murder clearance rate in Chicago is under 15%. If anyone is gonna "do someone in" best to do it in Chicago. The chances of getting caught are really low ...

Not that *I* have anyone I'd like "disposed of" ... just saying where the best place to do it is.

[trisham]

I’m guessing that they have lowered the bar.