Skip to comments.AOC Faces Ethics Questions After Reports Show Her Chief of Staff Cut Checks to Her Boyfriend Using a
Posted on 02/21/2019 9:11:42 PM PST by hapnHal
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) may have had her current chief of staff pay her boyfriend using campaign PAC money, according to a report from Luke Thompson, a National Review contributor.
Thompson started down the trail of analyzing Ocasio-Cortezs professional relationship with her boyfriend, Riley Roberts, after realizing that the congresswoman had Roberts listed as a staff member with his own house.gov email account. To have a Government email account you MUST have a Security Clearance YES/NO What's going on?
No way he’s nailing AOC. BEARD!
How do American Commies get a SC?
What’s the difference? That motor mouth would tell him anything he wants to know, anyway.
The deep state does the background check and VIOLA. Usually takes 6 months and up for normal people. Boinking AOC probably gets you in the fast lane.
I think the whole subject of security clearances and their importance or non-importance pretty much goes out the window when the Democrats are in charge of anything.
Debbie Wassermann-Schultz essentially let agents of a foreign intelligence agency run the computer network for the entire House of Representatives the last time they ran the place.
Clintoon famously had a staff full of un-cleared druggies..........
Weasel Mueller gives Uranium samples to the Rooskies...
With her cavernous mouth she’d be a hit with all the soybois in that area.
When you can put basking sharks to shame, you get popular with lots of people.
That may be what’s going on with her and the boyfriend.
He’s there to prevent brain vapor lock on the overnight.
This was always my question regarding the lawyers HRC used to prune her email server.
My beard theory stands.
But he could be “nailing her” in the same method of Bubba Clinton and getting paid for it.
Feel slightly sorry for the dude, he’s “admitting” to being with someone with a mouth full that should have a bit and bridle attached, maybe an oat bag too.
I just don’t see it. This boyfriend has all the testosterone of the Obamacare pajama boy.
Not saying he’s manly, but in “business contract relationships” that tends to be secondary to “you’re just slightly but not quite entirely unlike what I need, sign here” and he gets to not be bullied by the neighbors six year old while nominally getting to not be a soyvirgin anymore.
This kind of thing exists more and more among the soy filled millennials, think of it as contractual prostitution.
So “beard” but with some nookie happening via agreement.
Or, the mirror to how Hillary had a kid.
There is definitely something odd going on here. I can’t speak to Congressional email policy, but in the DoD, government email account holders must have some sort of official status. The categories I am familiar with include:
-Allied military w/duty at a U.S. unit
-Appropriated fund civilian employee
-Non-appropriated fund civilian employee (positions authorized by the Congress, but funded through PX profits, MWR fees, etc...)
-Allied civilian working at a U.S. unit
-Local national U.S. government employees
-Officially sanctioned volunteers
Boyfriend isn’t on that list
Regrettably security clearances are priced at a penny per box of one hundred. Well maybe not that low a cost but most security clearances are manufactured these days. Generally nobody knows whom has the proper credentials and most claiming a security clearance have none. Just like me. The world really is a dangerous place
Yes. Issued by the central committee.
OK, that pic pinged my gaydar so hard the needle fell off.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.