Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This Is NASA's Plan to Land Astronauts on the Moon in 2028 with Commercial Vehicles
www.space.com ^ | 02/15/2019 | By Tariq Malik

Posted on 02/15/2019 11:00:49 AM PST by Red Badger

NASA wants ideas for moon landers, space tugs and refueling ships.

NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine details the agency's plans to land astronauts on the moon by 2028 to space industry teams. (Image: © Joel Kowsky/NASA)

===================================================================

WASHINGTON — NASA really wants to land astronauts on the moon in 2028. But to do that, the agency is looking to commercial space companies to build the landers, space tugs and refueling stations required to make a moon exploration effort that lasts.

"This time, when we go to the moon we're going to stay," NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine told a roomful of space industry representatives here Thursday (Feb. 14). "So, we're not going back to the moon to leave flags and footprints and then not go back for another 50 years. We're going to go sustainably. To stay. With landers and robots and rovers — and humans."

The gathering at NASA's headquarters comes a week after the agency unveiled what it calls a Broad Agency Announcement calling on commercial space companies to submit ideas for lunar landers, tug-like transfer vehicles and refueling systems to gas up those vehicles for reuse. Interested companies have until March 25 to submit their ideas, with NASA aiming to make selections in May and issue contracts of up to $9 million for follow-up studies in July (just in time for the 50th anniversary of the Apollo 11 moon landing).

"This is going to be fast," said William Gerstenmaier, NASA's associate administrator of the Human Exploration and Operations. "We're going to need the best and brightest from you in industry. We're going to need the best and brightest from the international partner community to pull all this off."

NASA's renewed push to the moon comes from Space Policy Directive 1, an order signed by President Donald Trump in December 2018 directing NASA to return astronauts to the moon in a sustainable way.

The 21st century lunar architecture will use NASA's planned Gateway, an orbital space station near the moon, as a way station for astronauts en route to the moon. Transfer vehicles at the Gateway will ferry lunar landers to and from low lunar orbit. The landers (which consist of a descent element and reusable ascent element that carries the crew) would then make the final trip to the lunar surface.

Refueling spacecraft based at the Gateway will then resupply the transfer tugs and returning ascent vehicles for return trips to the moon. NASA leaders described it as an "open architecture" designed to foster new capabilities to explore the moon.

"We're doing it in a way that we've never done before," Bridenstine told reporters before the industry presentation.

NASA's Moon Return Plan: 2024

The first phase of NASA's return to the moon with astronauts begins in 2024 with an uncrewed decent vehicle landing test as the agency builds up its Gateway station in cis-lunar space. The descent vehicle, at this stage, is not reusable.

In 2028, NASA envisions a full-up uncrewed lunar landing on the moon. (Image: © NASA) 2026: Uncrewed Lunar Lander Full Test

In 2026, NASA envisions a full-up uncrewed lunar landing on the moon. The test would use a tug-like transfer vehicle to move to low lunar orbit from NASA's Gateway station, then land. The lander's ascent element would return to orbit and be ferried back to the Gateway by the tug.

In 2028, NASA will send four astronauts to the moon for a lunar landing from the agency's Gateway station, supported by refueling spacecraft. (Image: © NASA) 2028: Astronauts Back On the Moon

In 2028, NASA will send four astronauts to the moon for a lunar landing from the agency's Gateway station, supported by refueling spacecraft. The lunar ascent and transfer vehicles will be reusable. Astronauts would stay on the moon for up to a week at a time.

NASA envisions having multiple providers for lunar vehicles, Bridenstine said, similar to how two companies (SpaceX and Northrop Grumman) fly cargo missions to the International Space Station for the agency today. SpaceX and Boeing, in another example, expect to begin flying astronauts to and from the station for NASA later this year.

"We want many different participants, both commercially and internationally," Bridenstine said. "The purpose of the open architecture is to enable us to get to more parts of the moon than we've ever been able to get to before."

There are three main phases for NASA's return to the moon. Here's how it works:

First, in 2024, the space agency aims to launch the Orion spacecraft and European Service Module to the Gateway on the Space Launch System, NASA's new megarocket. A lander descent module will then launch to the Gateway on a commercial rocket for an uncrewed test landing demonstration on the lunar surface.

In 2026, an Orion spacecraft will launch astronauts to the Gateway along with the ascent element of a crewed lunar lander. Two commercial rockets will then launch a transfer vehicle and descent element of the lander to the Gateway. The transfer vehicle will fly the combined lunar lander from the Gateway to low-lunar orbit, then detach so the lander can descend to the moon's surface in an uncrewed full-up landing test. The transfer vehicle and lunar ascent element then return to the Gateway.

In 2028, the entire system comes together. A crew of four astronauts will launch to the Gateway in an Orion spacecraft on a Space Launch System rocket. They'll deliver an airlock to the station while they're at it. A series of commercial launches then follow, including two cargo and refueling missions (one for the Gateway and one for the transfer vehicle and lunar ascent element), and a new lunar descent element.

The astronauts will then use the transfer vehicle to fly their lander into low lunar orbit, detach and make the trip to the lunar surface. If this NASA plan is realized, the space agency could have humans back on the moon about one year before the 60th anniversary of the Apollo 11 landing.

One other takeaway from NASA's pitch on Thursday: The space agency doesn't just have its sights set on the moon.

"We're going to take as much of this as possible and the replicate it at Mars," Bridenstine said.

And while NASA is pushing forward on plans to return astronauts to the moon, the space agency is also forging ahead on its lunar science program.

Next week, the space agency will announce 12 science payloads it is developing for future flights to the moon under its Commercial Lunar Payload Services program, Thomas Zurbuchen, NASA's associate administrator for science missions, told reporters here. Those payloads will need rides to the moon, possibly as early as this year, and NASA is relying on commercial launch providers to step up to the plate.

"We care about speed," Zurbuchen said. "We want to start taking shots on goal."

Email Tariq Malik at tmalik@space.com or follow him @tariqjmalik. Follow us @Spacedotcom and Facebook.


TOPICS: Astronomy; History; Science; Travel
KEYWORDS: alabama; astronomy; corporatewelfare; elonmusk; falcon9; falconheavy; kingofpork; nasa; porkbarrel; richardshelby; science; spacex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
VIDEOS AT LINK.....................
1 posted on 02/15/2019 11:00:49 AM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Cannot they just pay for passage on a Chinese moon liner? /s


2 posted on 02/15/2019 11:04:50 AM PST by buckalfa (I was so much older then, but I'am younger than that now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Sorry, NASA, you'll have to take a train.

3 posted on 02/15/2019 11:06:49 AM PST by budj (combat vet, 2nd of 3 generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I guess I’ll get slammed for saying this. But this whole plan will be funded by borrowed money. And there will most probably be no return on that money. it’s not like the moon is filled with oil.

And if you want to develop new technology, do it right here on earth. No need to test it on the moon.

So yeah, this might be a good place to trim the federal budget.


4 posted on 02/15/2019 11:09:07 AM PST by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
I assume that it won't be Pan-Am.

5 posted on 02/15/2019 11:13:46 AM PST by jmcenanly ("The more corrupt the state, the more laws." Tacitus, Publius Cornelius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmcenanly

Virgin Galactic........................


6 posted on 02/15/2019 11:15:03 AM PST by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right
And there will most probably be no return on that money. it’s not like the moon is filled with oil.

Not oil, He3.....................

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/408558/mining-the-moon/

7 posted on 02/15/2019 11:16:59 AM PST by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Ping.


8 posted on 02/15/2019 11:17:12 AM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Will the astronauts be stranded there when the New Green Deal comes?


9 posted on 02/15/2019 11:17:33 AM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lurk

Of course not!

They can use windmills.................


10 posted on 02/15/2019 11:18:22 AM PST by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Winnebago, pick up the white courtesy phone...


11 posted on 02/15/2019 11:23:08 AM PST by COBOL2Java (Marxism: Trendy theory, wrong species)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

*ping*


12 posted on 02/15/2019 11:29:40 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj ("It's Slappin' Time !")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Commercial vehicles? Like the Seattle S.L.U.T (South Lake Union Transit) will take me there?

I wonder what they were thinking when they came up with that name not realizing the initials. Liberals.

13 posted on 02/15/2019 11:30:49 AM PST by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

Frisco Area Rapid Transit.................


14 posted on 02/15/2019 11:32:31 AM PST by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Now there’s one; do they have the T-shirt? Ours says” I Rode The SLUT.”


15 posted on 02/15/2019 11:33:55 AM PST by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Boy is that narrow minded. The value we got for the original moon landings is far more than the cost of them.

We can’t ‘just invent things here’ because you never know what you are going to need to invent until you try to do something new and difficult.


16 posted on 02/15/2019 11:35:27 AM PST by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jmcenanly

Wrong spaceship.

Pan-am flew only to low earth orbit and the space wheel...


17 posted on 02/15/2019 11:47:05 AM PST by usmcobra (Happiness is a belt fed weapon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/176625-60000-miles-up-geostationary-space-elevator-could-be-built-by-2035-says-new-study


18 posted on 02/15/2019 11:49:53 AM PST by BipolarBob (If attacked by a mob of clowns always go for the juggler.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmcenanly

Awesome 2001 Space Odessey Moon lander!


19 posted on 02/15/2019 11:51:53 AM PST by MarchonDC09122009 (When is our next march on DC? When have we had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The real value of Luna is enormous. Primary constituents are iron, aluminum, titanium, and silica.

Those materials can be used to create habitats, factories, mining/smelting equipment, etc.

Using a mag lev train track, you can launch payloads into Lunar escape orbits, perhaps to L5. Basically, an electric railroad that reaches 3 km/sec.

Using those materials you can build rotating space habitats a la O’Neill that could house billions of workers.

The near Earth asteroids have all the other elements needed for a space based civilization such as water and carbon compounds.

The only barrier to colonizing/industrializing space is financial. To get a space based civilization to the point of independence will cost trillions...but we can do it.

The financial benefits are orders of magnitude larger than the investment. There is an entire Solar System of raw materials out there waiting for us.

Ad astra


20 posted on 02/15/2019 11:59:41 AM PST by darth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson