Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chelsea Clinton shares insights on public health (privilege barf alert)
Cornell Chronicle ^ | 2/8/2019 | Kathryn Inman

Posted on 02/11/2019 5:10:48 AM PST by simpson96

Chelsea Clinton is a public health advocate, researcher and educator. But being a mother has deepened her passion for children’s health, she explained in a talk on Feb. 5 at Weill Cornell Medicine.

Clinton, a member of the Weill Cornell Medicine Board of Overseers, spoke to students and faculty about her passion for children’s health (snip)

In a conversation with Dr. Rainu Kaushal, chair of the Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, before a small audience of invited guests, Clinton highlighted the genesis of the Clinton Foundation (snip)

During her talk, Clinton, who has a Master of Public Health degree and a doctorate in international relations, discussed what she sees as the troubling rise in anti-science rhetoric and the damage it can do to public health. “I think one of the challenges that we see across health and science policy broadly is this reaction against evidence and data,” she said. (snip)

When asked how she chooses where to spend her time, given her busy agenda and her professional, academic and personal commitments, Clinton said she ultimately follows the same criteria. “One, am I compelled by the mission, what an institution is doing? Two, do I think I have something to contribute to the mission? And three, candidly, are the people who are already a part of that mission people that I want to spend time around?

“So most of what I do is related to health,” she continued, “and the things that are not are largely organizations or efforts driven by people that I really respect and I want to help and learn alongside. So I’m just thankful that I get to do the things I do.”

(Excerpt) Read more at news.cornell.edu ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: chelsea; chelseabio; publichealth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 02/11/2019 5:10:48 AM PST by simpson96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Anyone who disagrees with any modern Marxist political viewpoint is “anti-science”.

Don’t agree with Global Warming? You are “anti-science”.
Don’t support single payer health care? You are “anti-science”.
Don’t want a 70% tax rate? You are anti-science.
Don’t support a dictatorship of the proletariat as administered by the Ivy League Elitists? You are anti-science.


2 posted on 02/11/2019 5:16:17 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Born into free healthcare for life, she now sits on a dozen board of directors collecting big fat checks for her service. Yeah, I want to hear her opinions on the real world.


3 posted on 02/11/2019 5:20:27 AM PST by dead (Our next president is going to be sooooo boring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

I want Chelsea to see Liz Warren’s DNA expert to confirm who’s her daddy.


4 posted on 02/11/2019 5:24:17 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.r)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

If she cared at all about Americans’ “public health”, she would fight to stop illegals invading our country, bringing diseases we’ve eliminated decades ago.

Her “doctorate” is in Cluelessness.


5 posted on 02/11/2019 5:26:34 AM PST by Baldwin77 (They hated Reagan too ! TRUMP TOUGH - AMERICA STRONG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

She probably should be in jail.
Along with her mom and her mom’s husband (who haven’t lived together for 30 years?)


6 posted on 02/11/2019 5:26:51 AM PST by Leep (It's.. (W)all or nothing..!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

She’s a public health advocate because she couldn’t cut it as a medical student at Stanford. In other words, she has no business speaking about health issues at all.


7 posted on 02/11/2019 5:26:52 AM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

I’d like to hear Chelsea’s “insights” on sexual predators and rapists.


8 posted on 02/11/2019 5:29:22 AM PST by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

....hey Horseface, does your passion for children include murdering already born full term babies?

(Crickets chirping.....)


9 posted on 02/11/2019 5:32:01 AM PST by RooRoobird20 ("Democrats haven't been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Just like her mother - she’s an expert on everything. She puts the oracle to same.


10 posted on 02/11/2019 5:40:03 AM PST by ProudDeplorable
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Damn I’m tired of all these little Marxist princesses running around all over the place.


11 posted on 02/11/2019 5:40:07 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (#NotARussianBot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Chelsea gets her treatment at the free clinic?


12 posted on 02/11/2019 5:40:48 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96
During her talk, Clinton, who has a Master of Public Health degree and a doctorate in international relations, discussed what she sees as the troubling rise in anti-science rhetoric and the damage it can do to public health. “I think one of the challenges that we see across health and science policy broadly is this reaction against evidence and data,” she said.

I agree with her. The anti-science rhetoric and bullying by the far left is troubling.

13 posted on 02/11/2019 5:43:39 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I started reading her doctoral dissertation for Oxford and it was puerile — it reads like an editorial rather than scholarship. In the first 4 paragraphs she used the word “arguably” 3 times and threw in the word “interestingly” (”I do not think that word means what you think it means” — Princess Bride).

The way this piece reads, she must be the head of some agency. How could anyone work with that privileged retard as a boss.


14 posted on 02/11/2019 5:45:12 AM PST by Migraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I heard the quote IT IS SETTLED SCIENCE recently... On another subject. But the two “expcerts” had opposite opinions but based on Settled Science. LOL What a riot!


15 posted on 02/11/2019 5:49:23 AM PST by buffyt (Rush Limbaugh is M.R.G.A. = Making Radio Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dead

[[[Born into free healthcare for life, she now sits on a dozen board of directors collecting big fat checks for her service. Yeah, I want to hear her opinions on the real world.]]]

Excellent racket. She learned from the best in the business. This is the real rigged privilege of the elite.


16 posted on 02/11/2019 5:54:05 AM PST by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Migraine
... her doctoral dissertation ...

Hers? Or the one she submitted? (If the rumors are true).

So, if it was puerile, was it because the Clintons couldn't find somebody capable that would work for peanuts, or because if it was a worthy paper, no one reading it and had met Chelsea would believe she could actually write it?

17 posted on 02/11/2019 5:55:45 AM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

[[[Clinton, who has a Master of Public Health degree and a doctorate in international relations,]]]

All purchased of course.


18 posted on 02/11/2019 5:57:36 AM PST by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

“Chelsea Clinton is a public health advocate, researcher and educator. “

Why stop there?

She’s also a particle physicist, brain surgeon, and mathematician.

What can she really do?

Absolutely nothing. She’s a Clinton. Grifting is her game and thinking is NOT her game.


19 posted on 02/11/2019 6:07:18 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein
She’s a public health advocate because ...

... it sounds better when she runs for office to say she's been a public health advocate than an aimless leech who got multiple lucrative no show jobs she wasn't qualified for simply because her parents were powerful.

20 posted on 02/11/2019 6:08:43 AM PST by pepsi_junkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson