Posted on 11/13/2018 10:04:47 PM PST by ransomnote
That is interesting. Not sure what it means but it is interesting. Perhaps the clockfags have a line on it? (still haven't figured that one out)
The communities in California impacted by these fires have been on my mind this morning.
Of course no-one in the media is reporting the real problem behind these fires. So I decided to look into the Forest Management Issues in that area.
I think this project is in the area of the fire, https://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=41053
When you go to the link, it states the following,”Project cancelled due to issues with the planning process to date. See letter attached to this record.”
There was no letter attached, unless I missed it.
I scanned/read through the document above. It sounds as though they worked on this project since at least 2012, probably longer and then cancelled it after jumping through all the environMental hoops. My guess is a lawsuit was filed to stop the project. I have seen this on too many occasions.
These sue happy environMentalists have the blood of the lost souls from this fire on their hands. They are the reason the forests are a tinder box.
Of interest “The Feather River Ranger District has formed a new collaborative in an effort to provide a venue and opportunity for any interested or concerned citizen or stakeholder to be involved in the active and adaptive management of lands on the Feather River Ranger District.”
I have been trying to get the document of the Initial Meeting to download this morning, I am sure it would be enlightening. https://www.fs.usda.gov/detailfull/plumas/landmanagement/?cid=FSEPRD589058&width=full
https://twitter.com/LucasFoxNews/status/1062847509154848768
BOLTON DEPUTY OUT: “Mira Ricardel will continue to support the President as she departs the White House to transition to a new role within the Administration...”
-Sarah Sanders
:: transition to a new role within the Administration ::
If she is staying in “the Administration”, the FLOTUS kerfuffle was disinfo.
Canary Trap
Ricardel, target of administrative move. Needed excuse to move. Make up story involving FLOTUS [bird seed]
Mattis, rumored to go. [bird seed]
Nielson, rumored to go [bird seed]
Is there a leak in the FLOTUS side? USSS?
“Obama Kicks out reporter for asking questions Other Reporters cheer”
*****************
Would love for Trump to use the exact same words addressing Acosta, the next time he acts up. Watch the reaction and then show the video of Obama in action. The American public would get a reminder of how rude the reporters are, and how hypocritical they are in their actions.
:: Would love for Trump to use the exact same words addressing Acosta ::
Nope. Just play the Obama video for him. ‘Nuff said.
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3706361/posts
NON-Citizens Can Legally Vote in Arizona!
Arizona Secretary of State ^
Is Marky Mark wearing Notre Dame leprechaun underwear?
And just how is it the a Judge has authority over who attends Presidential press conferences?
The judge must not comprehend that “Freedom of the Press” has nothing to do with free access to the President.
Of all the dirt balls in politics, Schumer is the one I most want to see taken down.
You askin’ me about his underwear?
#nohomo
Seriously? “The harm to freedom of the press outweighs orderly press conferences”?
_______________
There is no harm being done to the Freedom of the Press. In another post I stated that Freedom of the Press does not translate to free access to Presidential conferences.
Our President need to ignore this unlawful judgment.
“””Of all the dirt balls in politics, Schumer is the one I most want to see taken down.”””
188% agree.
How is it he can beat out the stiff competition from Pelosi, DiFiChi, Maxine, Brazzille, Wasserman-Schultz, Kamala, Jackson-Lee, Pugasioux, Dr. Snipes.....and that’s a short list of just some of the women?
All cringe-worthy whenever I see them.
What’s wrong with me!!
Marbury v. Madison
Implications: Questions of the Constitutionality of actions in, with and among the top branches of government (Article 1, 2 & 3) are the purview of the SCOTUS, only.
This judge/court has no jurisdictional standing for this case.
But, a contempt citation would facilitate impeachment.
Trust the Plan.
Recall that “we” wanted Holder impeached.
Would a contempt charge for not following an unlawful “order” rise to the level of impeachment!?
You're right of course - the loathsome demonrats would try it; they're nothing but puppets dancing on Satan's strings.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.