Posted on 11/07/2018 10:44:17 PM PST by ransomnote
...will never forgive 0bola not just for what he did to the military but for “many other things which I will talk toyou in about the future!”
https://www.c-span.org/video/?454318-1/president-trump-matthew-whitaker-defends-reputation
I love POTUS DJ Trump.
Wise of you to be aware of that. LOL.
Worth reading and digesting:
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/11/10/adverse-interests-the-danger-within-the-q-phenomenas-current-messaging/
________________________________________
My two cents. I don’t see the appeal of the article.
For some reason, Sundance now happens to agree with what Deep State trolls have been saying for some time - that Q is a threat to the presidency.
“As you have seen recently, yesterday, President Trump is forcefully repeating that he has not had any contact with current Acting Attorney General Matt Whitaker. Part of the reason President Trump has to do this is because this false narrative, the “Q Theory”, has been drum-beaten by well-intentioned supporters. Many of those supporters, genuinely good people, have believed this coordinated theory. “
The left’s initial objections to Whitaker are based on articles Whitaker previously released stating that President Trump & Family should not have to release their financial documents and that Mueller’s probe is excessive. Once Sessions left and Whitaker is standing in, the Dems were ready with this objection and frankly, are trying to give Whitaker the Kavanaugh treatment - presently claiming he worked with a sham/scam organization and that the FBI is currently investigating.
Q never said that POTUS had contact with Whitaker. The Left was always going to claim he, or any other person in that position, was a POTUS lackey as long as they were not recused or corrupt, whether or not Q exists.
The left has falsely claimed Russia Russia Russia collusion for 2 years now and that wasn’t Q’s fault; the left has no problem making up false accusations against POTUS, supreme court nominees or anyone else who won’t help them destroy the country.
[RR] is too close to the center of all things to be a triple hat. Too mine yes watch his actions and follow him.
He wears one hat and it needs cleaning.
[UPDATED] Elections attorney Norris-Weeks: Effort for appointed position “awful and racist’
How do you walk away from something you were never on board with in the first place, troll?
#JustCurious
Comment by 100American, who posts very useful and informative comments.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3704753/posts?page=15#15
The rules of the game have changed, and the Feds can get involved where they had been prevented from doing so for 32 years by a consent decree that was killed in August of this year, prior to the election
The chains are off, and they are gonna be roasted, DHS has been preparing for this for many months... Illegals per all of the things that have been in motion and EO’s are now under the microscope legally and officially
I love it when a plan comes together
FL & AZ attempt*s) to ‘steal’ the election(s) - DO NOT LOOK HERE
CA shooting & Fires [same locations(s)] - LOOK HERE
***********
I really hope that Q isn’t implying that these things were done IN ORDER to distract from the election stealing attempts. If so, then this would be one place where I can’t follow Q. What I CAN believe is that the Dems/Media take ADVANTAGE of events to sit on an event so heavily that issues they don’t want to have to talk about can be ignored.
Am so visually oriented with a vivid imagination, that was guffaw material.
Though I don't think Sessions was very overt at all.
Apologies if this has already been posted .....
FISH = Forensic Information System for Handwriting. Maintained by USSS Forensic lab.
Is that how they are proving that the signatures don’t match?
Link from my comment above, sorry for no formatting of article:
End of 1982 Consent Decree: GOP finally can contest vote fraud after 36 years
August 8, 2018 by IWB
Just in time for this November’s mid-term elections!
Did you know that since 1982, the Republican Party had been legally prohibited from contesting elections due to suspected vote fraud, because of a legal agreement called the Consent Decree the GOP made with the Democrat Party?
Finally, 36 years later, a judge has ended the agreement, freeing the Republican Party to ensure electoral integrity by investigating and pursuing suspected vote fraud.
Betcha you never heard or seen this truly momentous news in the Left-infested mainstream nedia. Why’s that?
THE 1982 CONSENT DECREE
As I explained in my post of November 15, 2012, “Why the GOP won’t challenge vote fraud,” in 1981, during the gubernatorial election in New Jersey (NJ), a lawsuit was brought against the Republican National Committee (RNC), the NJ Republican State Committee (RSC), and three individuals (John A. Kelly, Ronald Kaufman, and Alex Hurtado), accusing them of violating the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1971, 1973, and the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.
The lawsuit was brought by the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the NJ Democratic State Committee (DSC), and two individuals (Virginia L. Peggins and Lynette Monroe).
The lawsuit alleged that:
The RNC and RSC targeted minority voters in New Jersey in an effort to intimidate them.
The RNC created a voter challenge list by mailing sample ballots to individuals in precincts with a high percentage of racial or ethnic minority registered voters. Then the RNC put the names of individuals whose postcards were returned as undeliverable on a list of voters to challenge at the polls.
The RNC enlisted the help of off-duty sheriffs and police officers with “National Ballot Security Task Force” armbands, to intimidate voters by standing at polling places in minority precincts during voting. Some of the officers allegedly wore firearms in a visible manner.
To settle the lawsuit, in 1982 — while Ronald Reagan was President (1981-1989) — the RNC and RSC entered into an agreement or Consent Decree, which is national in scope, limiting the RNC’s ability to engage or assist in voter fraud prevention unless the RNC obtains the court’s approval in advance.
The two parties agreed that “in the future, in all states and territories of the United States,” they would:
(d) refrain from giving any directions to or permitting their employees to campaign within restricted polling areas or tointerrogate prospective voters as to their qualifications to vote prior to their entry to a polling place;
(e) refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities in polling places or election districts where the racial or ethnic composition of such districts is a factor in the decision to conduct, or the actual conduct of, such activities there and where a purpose or significant effect of such activities is to deter qualified voters from voting; and the conduct of such activities disproportionately in or directed toward districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic populations shall be considered relevant evidence of the existence of such a factor and purpose;
(f) refrain from having private personnel deputized as law enforcement personnel in connection with ballot security activities.
The RNC also agreed that the RNC, its agents, servants, and employees would be bound by the Decree, “whether acting directly or indirectly through other party committees.”
To put it bluntly, the Consent Decree in effect gave a carte blanche to the Democrat Party to commit vote fraud in every voting district across America that has, in the language of the Consent Decree, “a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic populations.” The term “substantial proportion” is not defined.
In 1987, the Consent Decree was modified to define “ballot security activities” as “ballot integrity, ballot security or other efforts to prevent or remedy vote fraud.”
Since 1982, the Consent Decree had been renewed every year by the original judge, Carter appointee District Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise, who, even after he retired, returned every year for the sole purpose of renewing his 1982 order for another year. Debevoise died in August 2015.
U.S. District Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise
In 2010, the RNC appealed “to vacate or modify” the Consent Decreein “Democratic National Committee v Republican National Committee,” Case No. 09-4615 (C.A. 3, Mar. 8, 2012). But an appeals judge at the New Jersey District Court, Obama appointee Judge Joseph Greenaway, Jr., declined to vacate the decree.
Judge Joseph Greenaway, Jr., U.S. Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit
Flash forward to December 1, 2017, when the Consent Decree was due to expire.
According to NJ.com, the Democrat Party tried to extend the Consent Decree, claiming that the 2016 Trump presidential campaign had colluded with the RNC in voter intimidation efforts, and that Trump’s commission to examine suspected Democratic voter fraud was, in the words of Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ), “a thinly veiled voter suppression effort”.
But Sean Spicer, who had been a top RNC official before entering the Trump White House as spokesman, testified there was no collusion of the Trump campaign with the RNC, and that the RNC had stayed away from all 2016 election day activities, including any voter-intimidation, voter-suppression or ballot-security efforts. Nor did any party officials discuss voter fraud allegations with the Trump campaign. Spicer said:
“It had been abundantly clear for the six years that I worked at the RNC that the RNC and its employees were prohibited from engaging in Election Day activities, including poll watching, so I intentionally stayed away from all of that.
The [RNC] counsel’s office had been vigilant in informing both senior staff and subordinates on the importance of the consent decree and the activities that we were clearly should not be engaged at or be even perceived as engaging in. And so we had grown accustomed to not even coming too close to a line that would in any way, shape, or form lead one to believe that we were engaged in those activities.”
RNC lawyer Bobby Burchfield said Spicer’s testimony proved there was no collusion and asked the presiding judge, U.S. District Court Judge John Michael Vazquez, to allow the 1982 Consent Decree to expire.
As reported by NJ.com on January 9, 2018, Judge Vazquez ruled that the Democratic National Committee did not prove that the RNC violated the Consent Decree prior to its Dec. 1, 2017, expiration date.
And with that, Judge Vazquez, an Obama appointee, ended that noxious 1982 Consent Decree legal agreement between the RNC and DNC which had tied the Republican Party’s hands from contesting elections and investigating vote fraud for 36 years.
RNC spokesman Michael Ahrens said “We are gratified that the judge recognized our full compliance with the consent decree and rejected the DNC’s baseless claims” and that Judge Vazquez’s ruling “will allow the RNC to work more closely with state parties and campaigns to do what we do best, ensure that more people vote through our unmatched field program.” As a result, the GOP will be able to boost its Election Day turnout operations, including targeting potential voters and get them to the polls, which the Democrats have been able to do but the Republicans have not for 36 years.
Nominated by Obama to the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey in March 2015, John Michael Vazquez, 47-48, who received his J.D. from Seton Hall University School of Law, was confirmed by the Senate on January 27, 2016, by a vote of 84 to 2.
Thank you, Judge Vazquez, for your fair and judicious ruling.
I realize that is a doctrine of FAITH of Q deniers.
However, it is simply FACTUALLY FALSE. It is simply not true. Tons of things have happened as outlined by the Q team. And the rest are on schedule. Just subtract out a very few deliberate disinformation items and the record is clear.
I think we’ve got this one.
Even the Media Complex struggles to delay and deflect, but are unable to defend *actions* by the Broward ballot jockeys.
The depressed media seems to know that Broward gig is up.
Where’s all the joy gone, in that grand victory of theirs in the HOR?
Flake needs a permanent mirror in his view at all times. His reality testing is super flawed.
>>Is that how they are proving that the signatures don’t match?
Wonderful catch. Never saw that.
That's exactly what Q is implying, Mairdie.
He is also implying that the state of California takes advantage of wildfires to keep Federal disaster relief money pouring in to counteract their sorry overspending and loss of Federal funds from other sources due to their conflict with the Feds on other matters (sanctuary cities).
The spate of fires is largely due to "environmental" regulations and some would say (me) that they are California's fault. One could also go one step further and say they are purposeful, if not deliberate.
THIS is something I can believe.
#MoneyTalks
Whoa. You may be on to something, G.
.
I just post 'em, ma'am.
False flag? Who knows? But like you say, the media chooses what stories to blanket-cover and which ones to ignore. 4 am talking points and all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.