Posted on 11/04/2018 8:35:16 PM PST by ransomnote
They are N O T H I N G if they are sealed. You could double the number to 120,000 or make it a million sealed indictments. Impress me by unsealing a few, then we can talk.
*******I was the sane way until I stated looking for myself...below is just one of thousands...We know 60k is more than likely 20k people.
DUBLIN, GA: Federal indictments were unsealed today against 7 Dublin residents charged with federal firearms, drug distribution, and related offenses. The charges are the result of joint federal, state, and local efforts to reduce violent crime and drug activities in the Dublin area.
Sheldon?
Now what does "High priority targets today/tomorrow" mean? For the memes? Not sure I get it.
What does the House have to do with confirming judges?
He doesn't know, gotta be drunk, just here to cry and be spoon fed.
ransomnote, I ask this with all due respect. If we are going to wait until that listing is accomplished isn’t it fair to imply that we are talking several election cycles from now, if ever. If we cannot serve justice to those deserving it within a reasonable time frame as the Constitution says we must, why even issue indictments? I know that they are “sealed”, but if what according to what you have implied needs to be done, these indictments will outlive many of the accused and are thus useless. I just don’t see it. What is YOUR time span for this to be accomplished? Years? Decades?
So do we think President Trump is pointing to Qers in the audience for pictures of Q=us t-shirts if we see more in a drop tomorrow I will be sure of it.
My point was that there seems to be one excuse after another for why those sealed indictments have remained sealed. If the House becomes majority democrat, the ones giving excuses will simply use that as well. BTW, not agreeing with someone doesn’t make one drunk.
You aren't the first. But among beloved company.
My hubby and I don't watch TV. We have one so I can watch NASCAR tho. Eldest daughter came for a visit during season 3, says, "Mom, you gotta watch this show." So we binge watched. At some Sheldon-Spock reference dtr looks at me with a smirk and says, "Sheldon."
Yet you still stamp your feet and scream “nothing” has been done.
*********
They need to go back to November 1, 2018 and work their way forward and realized how much has been revealed, and how many firings and resignations have happened. Yes, we get impatient, but only because we know so much from following Q. Without that knowledge, those not following the Q threads, and those who take their news from the MSM, are lost, and or confused.
Trust the Plan. WWG1WGA.
Q's drops tend to be fuzzy, on the whole--deliberately.
And, the Q team warned in the beginning that some of them would be disinformation for strategic reasons.
One would need to ask--which DIMS? All of them? Unlikely to virtually certain NOT--at this time.
How exposed? How convincingly? By whom? In what context? etc. etc. etc.
NONE of that was communicated in any Q-Drops I'm aware of.
8 chan anonymous commentary and decoding is just that--other anons speculating. That's NOT the same as Q-team's clear assertions--however rare that is.
I think that will be tricky--given freedom of the press etc. I suspect a clear and emphatic treasonous, lying, clearly deliberately deceiving set of actions will be required. Certainly a LOT would qualify on the latter. Not sure how many would qualify on the treasonous.
Some may just be allowed to go away and never work in media again.
Two New Qs!
NO sweat at all. WE are all on the team. It is a team effort. Honored to contribute. Don’t need any accolades for that. Understanding is a great reward, in itself.
Hmmm...I didn’t take any shots at you in #291. I didn’t express impatience with you, I was expressing some empathy because I’ve been impatient too. (as others will attest - uh oh).
I thought you’d be more offended by the Oddball quote in #278. Which was snarky - not insulting. ;)
****
Now, to directly address the question of exposure.
I’m reaching back in dusty mental archives, and a quick check on qmap.pub.
There are 21 drops with the term “midterms”. Most of them talked about the left’s (now failed) attempts to create a blue wave - censorship, impeachment, Kavanaugh, Mueller, etc.
The most notable one for me is #1357. Here Q is reinforcing Anon’s point that all the judicial and legal steps must be in place prior to any big takedown. Q says post-midterms, and that November 11 will be a marker. This drop is from May.
#2288 also emphazises Nov 11, and points out that the midterms are just days prior.
#1197 is a good one from April. “Yes, midterms are safe. Watch CA.”
****
Back to the dusty-brain archives, I can recollect no promise to expose the dems prior to the midterms. I know we all *wanted* that to happen starting last Spring, but the mechanisms weren’t in place to deliver justice.
Was that a Q promise, or Anon just expecting it to happen? Is there a source?
I do remember early on Q said that the evil ones would claim they were running for office so they could then deflect any accusations as ‘mud slinging’. There was strong implication to me that it also meant that prosecutors would start swinging after the elections.
This is also bolstered by many admonitions to ‘vote’.
Oh, also announced today that DOJ will have election observers in 19 states, and we’ve seen several announcements the past few days from DOJ and DHS about election integrity, hotlines, and see-something-say-something. I think this will be the most closely watched election by authorities in decades. That took a while to set up as well.
I’m happy to kick my feet up for another couple days, and cook up some salty, buttered popcorn. I might even watch some CNN and MSNBC tomorrow night just for the schadenfreude! kek
I hope this is a bit more satisfactory way to address your question.
I can’t find where the exposure would happen before midterms, so if you can help me out with a source on that I’d be obliged.
It might aid your understanding and perspective if you’d trade your black glasses in for some at least a light grey.
Make that 3 new Qs with a POTUS “Q” video in the twitter feed!
INDEED. THANKS.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.