Posted on 10/26/2018 6:48:11 AM PDT by C19fan
The first game of the 1916 World Series—otherwise known as the last time the Red Sox and Dodgers met in the Fall Classic—took two hours and 16 minutes to play. It was slow relative to that season as a whole (or so we can infer; average time of game for 1916 is unavailable, but over the previous five years, it clocked in at just under two hours), but it was a sprint compared to the marathons we’re enduring in 2018. A 136-minute contest would’ve placed in the 99th percentile of game lengths from this season and was 48 minutes shy of the year’s average of 3:04. And it’s nothing compared to this postseason, when our shortest game to date has taken 155 minutes and the average matchup is a bloated 215.4 minutes long—a three hour, 35-minute slog, or 24 minutes less than Games 1 and 5 of the 1916 Series combined.
(Excerpt) Read more at si.com ...
I still love the game but it’s a joke to see leadoff hitters striking out over a hundred times a season. They obviously don’t teach contact hitting anymore.
140bm edm and hippity hop music in the parks
Do they play that crap at tennis matches too?
End instant replay and knock 30 minutes off the total game time. Baseball was just fine w/o for 100+ years
I would ban trips to the mound, and warm up pitches for relievers. The relievers should be all ready from throwing in the pen.
My modest proposal is to limit each team to three pitching changes per game.
If this goes back to Boston, it may well be snowed out till springtime.
I am a Generation Xer. I remember scheduled double headers. But greed got rid of that.
It’s not going back to Boston.
If they're not going to bring them back, maybe it's time to go back to a 150 game season.
I know, I know. Neither of those things is going to happen.
baseball=snore fest.
Make the starting pitcher go 5 full innings.
Limit relievers to 3 per game.
And NO mid-inning pitching changes.
Allow variance for legitimate injuries. If you come out early, 15 day disabled list.
That would shave at least 30 mins from the average game.
They set a major league record for home runs in a season, and yet they only had one player (Stanton) reach 100 RBIs for the season -- and he had exactly 100.
In other words ... Not only were the Yankees scoring most of their runs on home runs, but they were scoring many, many of them on SOLO home runs. It was pathetic to look at a box score and see that they had hit five home runs in a 7-5 win.
That's not baseball. It's batting practice.
I looked this up, and apparently the record for most doubleheaders played in a season was 44 -- by the 1943 Chicago White Sox. That number is even more remarkable when you compare it to the length of the schedule at the time. Teams played a 154-game season back then, so the White Sox played 88 of those 154 games in doubleheaders!
No one has mentioned that most of the time is spent watching pitchers pitch. Too few base hits. Too little ball handling by fielders. Move the pitcher’s mound back some.
I'm OK with 1-0 games. Some of the best games I ever saw were in the 1990s with Atlanta's pitching staff. Maddux would have complete games with under 90 pitches. Awesome stuff. Talk about fast paced games!
Amen! Preach on!
What I would like to see: <
End the game after seven innings instead of nine.
That was great stuff back then when starters were allowed to go deep into games. Now Maddux would be pulled after the 5th or 6th inning for a plethora of relief pitchers.
Limiting defensive shifts and limiting pitching changes would strongly encourage more base path running. We might actually have interesting games to watch even if it lasts over 3 hours.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.