Posted on 09/21/2018 6:20:23 AM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK
When California psychology professor Christine Blasey Ford made the allegations in a letter to pro-abortion Senator Diane Feinstein that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh supposedly sexually assaulted her, she said four people were allegedly at the party where it happened.
Ford made the allegations in a letter to pro-abortion Senator Diane Feinstein. The abortion activist held the letter since July from Ford detailing an alleged attack on her by Kavanaugh when they were in high school three decades ago. Suspiciously, Feinstein remained silent through the confirmation process and hearings until just days before a scheduled vote on his nomination.
Kavanaugh and alleged witness Mark Judge both said the sexual assault never took place. And now a third witness also says it never happened.
I read a couple of days ago that A guy named PJ Smyth had also denied it ever happened.
In that case we have to delay any votes past the midterm elections. If the midterms don’t go the Democrat’s way we have to delay any vote on Kavanaugh’s confirmation until 2020.
To do otherwise would be anti-woman and hateful. We need multiple FBI, CIA and NSA investigations of these credible attempted rape allegations!
/s
Yep. I mean, WHY THE RUSH?!
/s
For F’s sake can we move forward on this? I heard F-stein has refused to let Grassley see an un-redacted copy of the letter. WTH? Everyone surrounding this woman’s story is saying no way it happened. Enough.
How many people were suppose to be watching this non existent event anyway???
I mean, really? Does a 17 yo kid try to rape a girl at a party in front of a bunch of other party go-ers in the mid 80”s?
My first thought is that this was a very, very small "party".
My second thought is that under Sharia Law, a woman needs 4 witnesses to a sexual assault or else it never happened. She seems to have made the effort to reach that standard, but unfortunately for her, the 4 witnesses are speaking out against her.
Maybe Feinstein could get her Chinese Intel buddies to investigate. You know, someone she trusts.
If you’re lower on the hierarchy of grievances, you have no credibility. It’s like a caste system. So the testimony of a single female witness negates the testimony of 100 white males, even 1000. They need to know their place.
The fact that the accuser, (i.e. her lawyer and Chuck Schumer), demands to testify last is a clear indication that another sham is being shoved down the throats of the American people.
I say go forward with the vote. They media will plaster the air waves with liberal anti male hate speech. Many mothers and women have sons, are pro life, and like men. I think it would backfire on them
The more we back down the more angry democrats will become — victim-hood is their best game.
We said Monday... Christine Blasey Ford has had over 30 years to ‘go over’ her story - she’s ready to testify. Any delays are pure leftwing tactic.
The fastest way to take this issue off the table is to call the vote. Then vote. In seconds it becomes old news... The alternative is talking about a hair on a coke can 50 years later.
Yes move forward as planned. If she doesn’t show on Monday tell her she had her shot.
And ps the defense gets to testify last.
“We said Monday... Christine Blasey Ford has had over 30 years to ‘go over’ her story”
I thought a week was too long. A lot of coaching time. One of her demands is the right to subpoena witnesses. This is directly from the Rat war room. This demand will delay it for months.
Corrupt, lying, conniving, anti-gun, old crone Feinswein needs to be censured by the Senate for withholding evidence in a hearing. Even assuming some mild amount of validity to this charge (and that is a huge assumption, because I think it is patently obvious that there is no validity here whatsoever), the time to have brought it up was during the hearings. She had this letter back in July, yet waited until a couple of days before a vote on Cavanaugh’s nomination in the committee to throw this bomb. That is deceptive, and probably violates several rules of the Senate. She should be censured at a minimum, and possibly thrown out of the Senate altogether.
“I understand that I have been identified by Christine Blasey Ford as the person she remembers as ‘PJ’ who supposedly was present at the party she described in her statements to the Washington Post. … I am issuing this statement today to make it clear to all involved that I have no knowledge of the party in question, nor do I have any knowledge of the allegations of improper conduct she has leveled against Brett Kavanaugh.
“Personally speaking, I have known Brett Kavanaugh since high school and I know him to be a person of great integrity, a great friend, and I have never witnessed any improper conduct by Brett Kavanaugh toward women. To safeguard my own privacy and anonymity, I respectfully request that the Committee accept this statement in response to any inquiry the committee may have.”
I've heard enough, let's vote.
Crazy people are running this...the Dems truly are crazed (and panicked )
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.