Posted on 09/16/2018 10:46:52 AM PDT by Trump20162020
Earlier this summer, Christine Blasey Ford wrote a confidential letter to a senior Democratic lawmaker alleging that Supreme Court nominee Brett M. Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her more than three decades ago, when they were high school students in suburban Maryland. Since Wednesday, she has watched as that bare-bones version of her story became public without her name or her consent, drawing a blanket denial from Kavanaugh and roiling a nomination that just days ago seemed all but certain to succeed.
Now, Ford has decided that if her story is going to be told, she wants to be the one to tell it.
Speaking publicly for the first time, Ford said that one summer in the early 1980s, Kavanaugh and a friend — both “stumbling drunk,” Ford alleges — corralled her into a bedroom during a gathering of teenagers at a house in Montgomery County.
While his friend watched, she said, Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed on her back and groped her over her clothes, grinding his body against hers and clumsily attempting to pull off her one-piece bathing suit and the clothing she wore over it. When she tried to scream, she said, he put his hand over her mouth.
“I thought he might inadvertently kill me,” said Ford, now a 51-year-old research psychologist in northern California. “He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing.”
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
BS. And decades late if even remotely true.
Mkay.
This is what happened with Anita Hill. She didn’t want to go forward but was forced to.
Did he offer her a pubic-hair-covered Coke can? This woman obviously is unstable. What a putz.
The moment she wrote the accusation to a politician in opposition to a candidate, she lost the fiction of anomymity. It is now up to her to prove the almost forty year old allegations. She is a “professor” so her job is not in jeopardy, and the first problem is the drunken state she was in. The second is how she remembers it was Judge Kavanaugh. The third is does she have any contemporary documentation. Those questions are how you get to a point at which you can ascertain whose story is closer to the truth. It is not a he said she said, but because of the timing, extraordinary claims need extraordinary proof. Or at least some proof.
DK
Unstable would fit that profile.
Dems don’t care about Keith Ellison’s current charges...so why do they care about these. (and, yes, I know the answer)
Assuming that this is the same Christine Ford that teaches at Cal State Fullerton, here are a couple of comments from students:
Christine ford is the worst educator I have ever experienced. Avoid taking her class and avoid any interaction with this person. I feel like she has something wrong with her and I am surprised no one has caught this. Also avoid fullerton’s MSW program as long as she is there.
Prof. Ford is unprofessional, lacks appropriate filters, and I am honestly scared of her. She’s made comments both in class and in e-mails, if you cross her, you will be on her bad side. I fear to think of the poor clients that had to deal with her while she got her MSW and her LCSW. Absolutely the worst teacher I ever had.
To be fair, others said they liked her.
http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRatings.jsp?tid=1352705
Sorry, you are too late for the party. Over 30 years late.
I do hope that you are having nightmares about a made up story.
THAT is your fault, live with it.
Professor, California, suspicious.
Really getting tired of the drama here.
So the judge was a typical teenage horn dog male in the 80s and she wa drunk and probably did it while MTV was playing in the background talking about hot sex and wet t-shirt contests.
Move on...
And this story just happens to come from the biggest fake news paper of all time. A paper that is run directly by the deep state.
RESEARCH PSYCHOLOGIST IN CALIFORNIA.
Ok, I think I have this one alllll figgered out.
If the other guy says he was there, Kav is toast.
There were other witnesses, apparently. As well as the therapy session notes, and the other guy’s book.
This is not good.
“The notes say four boys were involved, a discrepancy Ford says was an error on the therapist’s part. Ford said there were four boys at the party but only two in the room.”
Four boys doesn’t sound like much of a party. And no other girls?
Oh - a social justice professor. Yeah I don’t believe this story at all now.
This was all a set up she always intended to go public.
Do these animals actually realize what will happen when they try to overthrow the government, against the most heavily armed population in world history?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.