Q Anon: 08/01/18 "Trust The Plan"

qanon.pub ^ | 8/1/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[stylin19a]

thanks. I’ve been chasin this for a long time.
at least you looked at some stuff.

What leads you to believe NYPD let some things out within 24hrs ? 24 hours of what date ?

What makes you think Lynch quashing a NYPD investigation is believable, when there really is no proof NYPD is involved in the first place ?

as FYI:
The IG report:

“Weiner” is mentioned 463 times
“Laptop” is mentioned 739 times.
“NYPD” is mentioned 0 times
“police” is mentioned 3 times. None is related to New York.
“lynch” is mentioned 565 times, none is related to NYPD

I need to suspend disbelief to think that NYPD is involved but not mentioned in the IG report.

I would like to hear your whys.

Thanks.

[Pete from Shawnee Mission]

That I cannot say....

[Axenolith]

Allodial

[Concentrate]

Thanks for that. :)

[DAVEY CROCKETT]

Lord have Mercy... woe

[TEXOKIE]

if swordmaker is going to put the lexicon on kindle can we also get “Texokie’s tales from the Qanteen”?

I always get a kick out those imaginative little narratives.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Swordmaker is definitely doing the heavy lifting on the LexiQon. I’m glad I get to help with it.

Thanks for kind words about my imaginative flights, edzo4. I appreciate your kind words to no end!

*texokie runs to her laptop under the piano to try to find the Qanteen narratives. As she plumps the pillows and luxuriates in the soothing action of scrolling through forty-eleven posts on her comments page, she realizes maybe it might have been a good idea to save them in one place.She is startled when a fork which has been missing from the Qanteen Qitchen resurfaces poking her in her nether parts...*

So THAT’S where that went!

Thanks for the suggestion, edzo4. I’ll start saving new ones, and see about ferreting out some of the previous ones.

[CJ Wolf]

And I have been lacking. Catching up in the am. E and F. Not D.

[TEXOKIE]

ThankQ much for keeping up the LexiQon. It is a huge undertaking, and you’ve done so much to keep it up to date.
~ ~ ~ ~

Thanks for your very generous comments, meyer. I have a lot of fun working with Swordmaker, who is gracious to let me help.

[JockoManning]

1. Because of the NYPD SOURCED public assertions within 24-48 hours of the first major event about Weiner’s arrest/laptop.

2. Those same initial assertions were quickly removed, buried, denied, squelched, removed. That immediately said to me they were accurate.

3. I felt in my spirit that the assertions as horrible as they were—that they were the tip of the iceberg and solidly true.

[JockoManning]

I’m not that surprised that the NYPD was not mentioned in the IG report. TONS of stuff was left out of that initial IG report. It is clear to me that the disclosures are to be made in very calculated iterations over significant periods of time. Perhaps to enable the culture to absorb such without disintegrating.

The video at this link has some interesting data on the issue

https://foreverunlimited.wordpress.com/2018/07/23/kevin-shipp-indictments-coming-for-hillary-and-co-conspirators/?blogsub=confirming#subscribe-blog

at about minute 20:00—28:00

imho, you are as wrong as rain about Shrillery and her horrific child abuse . . . and about the NYPD’s awareness of such.

The evidence for such is somewhat around the edges of the major media and even a lot of the alternate media.

However, the evidence is available if one searches thoroughly enough.

SHIPP has the clearance and history and connections to know what he’s talking about.

[stylin19a]

repeating an assertion doesn’t answer the questions I have posed.

When\what date was the first major event about Weiner’s laptop\arrest ?”

I don’t take any issue with the contents of weiners laptop. I take issue that NYPD has any role in this.

Riddle me this:
It there were NYPD SOURCED public assertions and they were removed ( completely ? from the entire world wide web ? ) how do YOU know they even existed ? Did you see them ? with quotes from named NYPD sources ?

Here is the True Pundit story - please note if there is any concrete sourceable info in it.

https://truepundit.com/breaking-bombshell-nypd-blows-whistle-on-new-hillary-emails-money-laundering-sex-crimes-with-children-child-exploitation-pay-to-play-perjury/

Heres Princes interview 2 days later - please note if there is any concrete sourceable info in it - see if anything matches True Pundit report?.

https://www.breitbart.com/radio/2016/11/04/erik-prince-nypd-ready-make-arrests-weiner-case/

[stylin19a]

um...you are as wrong as rain as I made no mention of Hillary ever....as for NYPD being aware, that’s what I am chasing. There is no evidence that the evidence on Weiner’s laptop was found by NYPD.
Haven’t you ever wondered why:
- With all the people in the NYPD, there has not been one leak ? Not one word ? Not one verification of anything Weiner ? How does that secret stay kept for these almost 2 years ?
- That there is no warrant available from NYPD ?
- That there are no case records available from the NYPD ?
- Since the IG report came out the NYPD has remained silent ? Doesn’t make sense to sit on anything now that the cat is out of the bag, does it ?

If you looked at my stuff, I posted that same Shipp interview link for a transcript. It’s the same report that Prince gave...those are the only two who gave it. Neither gave specifics. A couple of others reported it off a tweets, after Prince reported it.

I have been chasin this story since True Pundit reported it 11/02/2016. At that time so many other outfits were reporting that story. (do a search on “weiner nypd” - see how many reported on the story)Turns out, they were reporting what True Pundit was reporting...giving links to the True Pundit story, then quoting the info from True Pundit.
It seemed strange that not one place gave an independent accounting, but they did give a link to the true pundit story.

MSM didn’t touch the story. True Pundit had no documentation other than rumor, innuendo and unnamed sources when it comes to NYPD.
We at FR hammer MSM when they use anonymous sources, but we embrace it when it serves out purpose ?
And if you look at the Shipp interview ? unnamed sources.

I have searched and there is no evidence re: the NYPD ever had the Weiner’s laptop.
I thought maybe you had something to contribute. And you have provided none.

Maybe I’ll get a definitive answer once NYPD answers an FOIL request.

[JockoManning]

I respect your extensive research of long standing.

I don't have any more info to offer.

My opinions and feelings about it remain. Time will tell if they were ever based on what I can vaguely recall their being based on. And I don't remember what text I read or video I watched about it. I think it was text I read.

[JockoManning]

Perhaps one last strategy would be to use your social network etc. to the max to try and connect with someone who has a great relationship with a higher ranking NYPD person . . . and ask some low key to slowly escalating more pointed questions about such. You should be able find out at least some ball park generalized comments.

[stylin19a]

thank you

[stylin19a]

been working on it. My NY sources are now living in Florida...go figure :)
thank you.

[xone]

f I wanted to kill someone wearing a bullet proof vest my first choice would not be a .45 automatic.

It is a very accurate round, no one wears armor on their head.

[JockoManning]

You are plenty able to pose good questions.

Nevertheless some that come to mind for me were I doing it. . . would be

1. Are you aware of anything serious on the Weiner laptop implicating HRC?

2. Are you aware of anything horrific on the Weiner laptop implicating HRC?

3. Have you heard or observed of any NYPD upper level personnel viewing horrific things on the Weiner laptop implicating HRC?

4. On a scale of 1-10 with 10 the most horrific stuff straight from hell, how bad would you rate what was purportedly seen?