Q Anon: 6/27/18 FRiendly FReeper Collaboration to understand Q drops

qanon.pub ^ | 6/27/18 | FReepers, vanity

[Pearls Before Swine]

I mostly agree with you about the mindlessness of the FISA process, and how it is an excuse for secrecy with a host of safeguards that not only don’t work, but aren’t intended to work.

Some facts for estimating the workload from Wikipedia:

- Over 33 years, there have been 33,942 FISA warrants granted,

- ... with only 12 denials.

That works out to roughly 1000 warrants per year, or 4 per working day. It’s a lot, but not so many that some care can’t be exercised (although with that approval percentage, it’s obvious that its usually treated as a rubber stamp).

[Cboldt]

-- That works out to roughly 1000 warrants per year, or 4 per working day. --

And what are we told, each one being 100 pages?

FWIW, I think good faith is applied most of the time. My point is that the bad faith stuff is going on like gangbusters, avoiding that "make work" charade because the function of the illicit snoop is illicit - like getting political advantage, or revenge, and so on. The system allows warrantless snooping, and the data conduits (AT&T to name one) comply without a particularized warrant. NSA is wholesale monitoring, and FBI has the hardware to get what it wants. I could drive a car on the public roadways before I was licensed to do so - just don't get caught. There is VERY LOW risk of getting caught doing illicit snooping. Who could possibly know?

I think the whole point of getting the Carter Page FISA warrant was to legitimize past illicit snooping. Once the FISA court issues a warrant, the FISA law immunizes the snooper. And the FISA warrant allows a backward in time look, so all the past snooping is covered by the warrant.

[Bob Ireland]

***wanted to wish you a very Happy and wonderful Birthday, and many many more!***

Thanks! 😊

[Cats Pajamas]

This was posted Over on 8ch on new Qpost board. Some are speculating person in back seat with beard is SCR.

[Cats Pajamas]

[Cats Pajamas]

[Billyv]

Perhaps their hack cannot be done remotely now and requires an onboard operative (wifi range)?

It would still trigger an alert through the onboard computers if code broken, an alert sent through the aircraft transponder would alert authorities.

This would trigger the response from tower unknown to pilots, mobilize the agents/LEOs and point to the bad actor on the plane, all removed, bad actor detained (with evidence/device).

MAGA!

[Bigg Red]

Mark

[HoneysuckleTN]

Just watched it again, Trump makes a Q and after repeated questions about the storm says “you’ll find out”. My memory was right. :-)

When that came up in the early Q threads, I did not realize it happened before Q started posting. That's so cool and should be considered one of the things to prove Q is real!

[Bigg Red]

That was totally uncalled for. Cboldt is a good and smart man.

[CPT Clay]

#746 Awesome Post!!!

[Bigg Red]

mark

[Triple]

Mark to read again... ump

[Bigg Red]

Keep those corrections and fill-ins coming please, everybody.

....
Okay, then. Please don’t take our Lord’s name in vain.

Thanks for all of your hard work, bags.

[Bigg Red]

...the Penn Biden Center for diplomacy and global engagement.

>>>
Oh, boy, sounds like yet another DS power grabbing agency.

[Bigg Red]

Got these 2 names from the article in the NYT(spit!):

Chuck Gieg
Tod Johnstone

[Bigg Red]

Sessions should be doing the dirty work

>>>

How do you know he is not? Do you think that he is setting all of his traps out in the open and announcing where they are?

[Bigg Red]

Well said.

[little jeremiah]

Yeah, if someone had the time and energy to dig around, it would probably reveal a lot. I don’t have the time though. Just the name “Biden” is enough for me.

[Bigg Red]

Exactly! Thank you.